(Read comments) - (Post a new comment)

	serai 2007-01-11 06:22 am UTC (link)
	Funny, that's what an extraterrestrial of superior intelligence might say about the average housewife. I guess it's all in the point of perspective, eh? (Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

	mindset 2007-01-11 06:40 am UTC (link)
	And when the theoretical extraterrestrial of theoretical superior intelligence fucks the theoretical average housewife while his theoretical colleagues bemoan his theoretical ethics, then perhaps we can use that argument in a debate of non-theoretical horsefucking. You fail at logic, perspective, and life. FOAD, please. (Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

	serai 2007-01-11 08:09 am UTC (link)
	My, my, how very civilized you are. Do you always end conversations with people that way? Or only those you don't agree with? (Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

	mindset 2007-01-11 08:38 am UTC (link)
	Only with fuckwits. :D (Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

	serai 2007-01-11 09:13 am UTC (link)
	LOL Well, considering your conversational flair, you'd be the authority on fuckwittery, I'd say. By the by, next time you want to get all up in somebody's face, I'd suggest you choose someone who actually is on the other side of the argument, and not just asking questions about the topic. (Reply to this)(Parent)

	skewed_tartan 2007-01-11 06:53 am UTC (link)
	Where in the HELL did that one come from? (Reply to this)(Parent)

	jetamors 2007-01-11 08:09 am UTC (link)
	...And if those being actually existed, it would be wrong for them to have sex with us. What's your point? (Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

	serai 2007-01-11 08:11 am UTC (link)
	sigh Read my post again. I'm not defending sex with animals. I'm interested in the concept of "consent" and what that means when we apply it to beings different from us, on whatever grounds. If you'd read my post more carefully, you'd know that. (Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

	jetamors 2007-01-11 08:17 am UTC (link)
	This is not the place for Your Thoughts On Consent. Unless you're going to be funny or hilariously wanky, go away. (Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

	serai 2007-01-11 08:20 am UTC (link)
	And you're following this comment thread why, exactly? For the laughs, is it? (Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

	jetamors 2007-01-11 08:36 am UTC (link)
	Sorry, you're still not funny. You should spice it up with a hilarious macro of some sort! For example, you could have appended the following to your previous response: and possibly someone somewhere might have chuckled. As it is, I'm afraid I'll be the one applying to you. (Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

	serai 2007-01-11 09:11 am UTC (link)
	shrugs Fine, whatever. Have a nice day! (Reply to this)(Parent)

	mcity 2007-01-11 05:19 pm UTC (link)
	When did his head get so big? (Reply to this)(Parent)

	lottelita 2007-01-11 09:00 am UTC (link)
	OTF isn't the place for thoughts on yaoi? I know you're not new. Other explanation plz? (Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

jetamors
2007-01-11 06:49 pm UTC (link)

You see, my friend, I have a dream.

I have a dream that someday otf_wank will be a place where people trade witty quips on the nature of a particular wank. I have a dream that the only people bringing wank in the comments will be idiotic trolls, whom we can all band together to LOL at no matter what our opinion on the issue. I have a dream of time when otf_wank actually brings the funny.

It won't happen in a day. It may not happen in a week. But if we all band together, someday, possibly as early as next month, this place may be transformed into a shining city on a hill, mocking all and sundry wankers without getting distracted by the "real issues".

(And yeah, blah blah hypocrisycakes. BUT MY POINT IS STILL VALID.)

(Reply to this)(Parent)

(Read comments) -