Log In

Home
    - Create Journal
    - Update
    - Download

LiveJournal
    - News
    - Paid Accounts
    - Contributors

Customize
    - Customize Journal
    - Create Style
    - Edit Style

Find Users
    - Random!
    - By Region
    - By Interest
    - Search

Edit ...
    - Personal Info &
      Settings
    - Your Friends
    - Old Entries
    - Your Pictures
    - Your Password

Developer Area

Need Help?
    - Lost Password?
    - Freq. Asked
      Questions
    - Support Area



itsirtou ([info]itsirtou) wrote in [info]otf_wank,
@ 2007-01-10 17:28:00


Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry

Over at the libertarianism community on ElJay, [info]lefthandedninja asks, "Do you think possessing child pornography should be a crime?"  in reaction to this article.  (Apparently, instead of turning in his final exam, some dumbass turned in a CD full of child porn.)

Fantastic.

[info]kadeshaderow gets things started off the right way by asking, "Are you fucking retarded?" and then continues to splooge all over the place.  (Now with bolding and underlining action!) 

The wank then moves on to whether or not the age of consent is arbitrary, and whether that even pertains to the subject at hand since the CD turned in contained pictures of very young children.

[info]vox_soli feels the need to tl;dr to the max about how she is an anarchist and actually SAYS, "I more or less think that it's okay as long as the child in question has a sufficiently mature understanding of the whole idea of sexuality to consent and there isn't any question of coercion or undue influence from an authority figure."   She, [info]cyclotron, and [info]ragnarok20 go on to have a nice healthy debate over whether or not you can define a law if you don't actually believe in laws.

But!  [info]ragnarok20 simply cannot take this lying down!  Instead of replying on the first post, he has to make a whole new post about how big of an idiot [info]kadeshaderow is.

Thankfully, this post looks semi splooge-free at the moment, but the second the usual suspects show up, it'll explode, mark my words. 



(Read comments) - (Post a new comment)


iwanttobeasleep
2007-01-11 01:11 am UTC (link)
I know there are a lot of good, rational libertarians out there, but god if every time I hear about them, it's because of something inanely stupid or downright wrong.

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]itsirtou
2007-01-11 01:14 am UTC (link)
Goddamn it, I know. That's why I'm so conflicted over reporting LJ libertarian wank -- cause I swear to god that comm wanks over the most horrifying things. Last time I posted a libertarian stupid in stupid_free, most of the replies were "Libertarians suck and are generally soulless beings from the deepest pit of hell."

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]t_boy
2007-01-11 03:38 am UTC (link)
Oh.

That explains Eric S. Raymond, at any rate.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]itsirtou
2007-01-11 03:40 am UTC (link)
D:

Goddamn you, Eric S. Raymond.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]tiye
2007-01-11 04:16 am UTC (link)
Huh. That guy sounds an awful lot like one of the regulars over in the atheism community on LJ. I wonder . . .

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]t_boy
2007-01-11 04:47 am UTC (link)
Which is funny, since he is, by all indications, pagan.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]tiye
2007-01-11 04:49 am UTC (link)
Probably not the same guy, then. Creepily similar personality/views/writing style, however.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]t_boy
2007-01-11 05:28 am UTC (link)
Or maybe it is him!

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]tiye
2007-01-11 06:40 am UTC (link)
Eric S. Raymond = Phanatic = . . . Msscribe?

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]akairis
2007-01-11 07:50 am UTC (link)
That would be terrifying.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]kadath
2007-01-11 02:41 pm UTC (link)
Bwa ha ha. Phanatic is a jerk. (Who reads my LJ and won't go away.)

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]tiye
2007-01-11 03:54 pm UTC (link)
Yeah, I kind of dread seeing his damn Marlboro Man Bush icon (shudder) every time I read a post in that community. My condolences on having to deal with him on your own turf. D:

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]kadath
2007-01-11 04:00 pm UTC (link)
I agree with him about atheism and a couple of space exploration topics, and that's it, but it was enough that he friended me. He doesn't comment much, and I stopped reading his LJ when I realized it was bad for my sanity, but one of his even nastier friends followed me home. (Seriously, this guy make Phanatic look like a peach.)

THERE ARE LIBERTARIANS IN MY LJ. HALP.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]the_mouse
2007-01-12 07:15 am UTC (link)
Followed you home?

Please tell me he got arrested.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]kadath
2007-01-12 02:59 pm UTC (link)
Not "home" in the real world. "Home" as in "my journal." We first ran into each other in a community.

...Ahgahd, now I'm going to have nightmares.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]the_mouse
2007-01-13 12:04 am UTC (link)
Thank God! Not about the nightmares. I'm glad, for once, that I misinterpreted something. :3

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]ecchaniz0r
2007-01-11 12:35 pm UTC (link)
FUCKdammit.

I like the Jargon File. Why does its maintainer have to be a gormless dickwaffle with pube sauce!?

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]exdee
2007-01-11 02:57 pm UTC (link)
I hate that, when I really like something and then find out that I don't like the creator...

/fucking Dahl...

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]taktuk
2007-01-11 05:51 pm UTC (link)
Augh. I thought I'd managed to put that out of my mind, but, as always, my brain ALWAYS obeys the undelete command.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]luthe
2007-01-11 08:53 pm UTC (link)
*pointedly does not ask*

(Reply to this)(Parent)


(Read comments) -

 
   
Privacy Policy - COPPA
Legal Disclaimer - Site Map