Log In

Home
    - Create Journal
    - Update
    - Download

LiveJournal
    - News
    - Paid Accounts
    - Contributors

Customize
    - Customize Journal
    - Create Style
    - Edit Style

Find Users
    - Random!
    - By Region
    - By Interest
    - Search

Edit ...
    - Personal Info &
      Settings
    - Your Friends
    - Old Entries
    - Your Pictures
    - Your Password

Developer Area

Need Help?
    - Lost Password?
    - Freq. Asked
      Questions
    - Support Area



itsirtou ([info]itsirtou) wrote in [info]otf_wank,
@ 2007-01-10 17:28:00


Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry

Over at the libertarianism community on ElJay, [info]lefthandedninja asks, "Do you think possessing child pornography should be a crime?"  in reaction to this article.  (Apparently, instead of turning in his final exam, some dumbass turned in a CD full of child porn.)

Fantastic.

[info]kadeshaderow gets things started off the right way by asking, "Are you fucking retarded?" and then continues to splooge all over the place.  (Now with bolding and underlining action!) 

The wank then moves on to whether or not the age of consent is arbitrary, and whether that even pertains to the subject at hand since the CD turned in contained pictures of very young children.

[info]vox_soli feels the need to tl;dr to the max about how she is an anarchist and actually SAYS, "I more or less think that it's okay as long as the child in question has a sufficiently mature understanding of the whole idea of sexuality to consent and there isn't any question of coercion or undue influence from an authority figure."   She, [info]cyclotron, and [info]ragnarok20 go on to have a nice healthy debate over whether or not you can define a law if you don't actually believe in laws.

But!  [info]ragnarok20 simply cannot take this lying down!  Instead of replying on the first post, he has to make a whole new post about how big of an idiot [info]kadeshaderow is.

Thankfully, this post looks semi splooge-free at the moment, but the second the usual suspects show up, it'll explode, mark my words. 



(Read comments) - (Post a new comment)


[info]grrliz
2007-01-11 02:02 am UTC (link)
First of all, as an anarchist I reject the concept of crime

*eyeroll*

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]lerefuge
2007-01-11 02:08 am UTC (link)
First of all, as an anarchist I reject the concept of crime

what.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]silrana
2007-01-11 02:23 am UTC (link)
Excellent. Then I'm sure he/she wouldn't mind if I were to shoot them for being an idiot. All in the spirit of anarchy, of course.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]jerel
2007-01-11 04:42 pm UTC (link)
Anarchy always sounds like a nice idea when you're typing about it from your nice middle-class house. Until they bust in and take your stuff.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]silrana, 2007-01-12 12:35 am UTC

[info]marumae
2007-01-27 02:18 am UTC (link)
This comment is old but I just saw and I must say, I am giving you a big shiny new WIN. <3

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]visp
2007-01-11 02:32 am UTC (link)
Exellent! I say we break into his/her house, loot it, and beat the crap outta him/her. Anyone else wanna come?

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]mistressrenet
2007-01-11 03:06 am UTC (link)
Only if I get to set the house on fire too.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]visp, 2007-01-11 09:33 am UTC

[info]april_hurst
2007-01-11 03:44 am UTC (link)
I want the laptop and DVD player, if applicable. If there aren't any, I'll settle for the CD collection and jewelry.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]hallidae, 2007-01-11 06:59 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]taktuk, 2007-01-11 05:45 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]april_hurst, 2007-01-11 09:46 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]visp, 2007-01-11 09:30 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]april_hurst, 2007-01-11 09:46 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]visp, 2007-01-12 07:46 am UTC

[info]napalmnacey
2007-01-11 07:01 am UTC (link)
Yeah! And we'll stick knives in her furry animals!

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]some_dude
2007-01-11 02:40 am UTC (link)
That would be egoism. Seriously. An excellent definition in this instance.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


verthandi
2007-01-11 03:55 am UTC (link)
Your icon is a thing of beauty that fills me with glee.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]some_dude, 2007-01-11 04:04 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]jerel, 2007-01-11 04:43 pm UTC

[info]froda_baggins
2007-01-11 04:49 am UTC (link)
Hah. Hahahahahaha.

Your icon is MADE OF WIN.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]judyhazeleyes
2007-01-11 03:27 am UTC (link)
I think they've confused anarchy with pretentious asshattery.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]doc_lydgate
2007-01-11 05:29 am UTC (link)
Many people do.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]aposiopetic
2007-01-11 04:03 am UTC (link)
Listen, she's just rejecting your reality and substituting her own.


Or, you know, she's something of a twat.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]innsmouth_eyes
2007-01-11 08:36 am UTC (link)
No no, when Mythbusters do that it's cool, everybody else has to just deal with it.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]stella_polaris
2007-01-11 11:22 am UTC (link)
Yay at MB reference!

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]naienko
2007-01-11 03:46 pm UTC (link)
Icon.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]seiberwing
2007-01-11 04:18 am UTC (link)
Do people actually believe this, or do they just say it to sound cool?

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]grrliz, 2007-01-11 04:23 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]seiberwing, 2007-01-11 04:49 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]doc_lydgate, 2007-01-11 05:31 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]seiberwing, 2007-01-11 05:35 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]semirecluse, 2007-01-11 04:46 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]seiberwing, 2007-01-11 04:47 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]napalmnacey, 2007-01-11 07:04 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]jerel, 2007-01-11 04:46 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]napalmnacey, 2007-01-13 05:11 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]grrliz, 2007-01-11 05:05 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]semirecluse, 2007-01-11 05:53 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]sabinelagrande, 2007-01-11 08:54 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]shadowkitty, 2007-01-11 02:31 pm UTC

[info]croik
2007-01-11 05:56 am UTC (link)
The same person went on to say they don't really believe in a right to privacy either, I think...?

I know it's bad to wish ill on other people, but...what if it's for their own good...!?

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]mmanurere
2007-01-11 07:21 am UTC (link)
Hooray for internet anarchists! They go to the same school as the internet lawyers...and for the most part lawyers:internet lawyers::anarchists:internet anarchists really seems to work.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]the_clichemoth, 2007-01-11 03:11 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]mmanurere, 2007-01-11 05:42 pm UTC

[info]aerobot
2007-01-11 11:14 am UTC (link)
Maybe she should try committing one then. I'm sure she'll have trouble 'rejecting' it then.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]lillyv
2007-01-11 02:26 pm UTC (link)
And once again it's prove that there is either a Penny Arcade or a Something Positive strip for any wank occasion.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]lindentreeisle, 2007-01-11 04:45 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]lillyv, 2007-01-11 05:07 pm UTC

[info]waterfront
2007-01-11 02:51 pm UTC (link)
She's so edgy.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]angel_kathryn
2007-01-12 03:44 am UTC (link)
Great, can I have his/her stuff, then?

(Reply to this)(Parent)


(Read comments) -

 
   
Privacy Policy - COPPA
Legal Disclaimer - Site Map