Log In

Home
    - Create Journal
    - Update
    - Download

LiveJournal
    - News
    - Paid Accounts
    - Contributors

Customize
    - Customize Journal
    - Create Style
    - Edit Style

Find Users
    - Random!
    - By Region
    - By Interest
    - Search

Edit ...
    - Personal Info &
      Settings
    - Your Friends
    - Old Entries
    - Your Pictures
    - Your Password

Developer Area

Need Help?
    - Lost Password?
    - Freq. Asked
      Questions
    - Support Area



itsirtou ([info]itsirtou) wrote in [info]otf_wank,
@ 2007-01-10 17:28:00


Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry

Over at the libertarianism community on ElJay, [info]lefthandedninja asks, "Do you think possessing child pornography should be a crime?"  in reaction to this article.  (Apparently, instead of turning in his final exam, some dumbass turned in a CD full of child porn.)

Fantastic.

[info]kadeshaderow gets things started off the right way by asking, "Are you fucking retarded?" and then continues to splooge all over the place.  (Now with bolding and underlining action!) 

The wank then moves on to whether or not the age of consent is arbitrary, and whether that even pertains to the subject at hand since the CD turned in contained pictures of very young children.

[info]vox_soli feels the need to tl;dr to the max about how she is an anarchist and actually SAYS, "I more or less think that it's okay as long as the child in question has a sufficiently mature understanding of the whole idea of sexuality to consent and there isn't any question of coercion or undue influence from an authority figure."   She, [info]cyclotron, and [info]ragnarok20 go on to have a nice healthy debate over whether or not you can define a law if you don't actually believe in laws.

But!  [info]ragnarok20 simply cannot take this lying down!  Instead of replying on the first post, he has to make a whole new post about how big of an idiot [info]kadeshaderow is.

Thankfully, this post looks semi splooge-free at the moment, but the second the usual suspects show up, it'll explode, mark my words. 



(Read comments) - (Post a new comment)


[info]thekiwiwhoflew
2007-01-11 11:50 am UTC (link)
Christ, yes. I had a friend like that, drove me up a wall. That "Children are very sexual beings!" excuse got very annoying, very fast. Then again, it was a 15 year old childhatingfree furry so..

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]ghostmaster
2007-01-11 05:13 pm UTC (link)
I was reading Redbook (because I was stuck in a hospital waiting room for three hours; leave me alone), and they had an article by some lady who encouraged and approved of sexuality in her two year old. She talked about the daughter used the car seat to masturbate, and once found her naked sitting across some little boy who had his hand stuck up her vagina "looking for her penis". And then I stopped reading because I was thoroughly squicked by her attitude of approval.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]pyrrah
2007-01-11 11:21 pm UTC (link)
Just think of all the internal damage that could cause to someone that young... Dear God...

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]thekiwiwhoflew
2007-01-12 08:08 am UTC (link)
..How did child services not read that article and proceed to take the woman and shove her into a cell with a woman named "Big Bertha" who would then show the chit just how wrong the statement was?

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]pyrrah
2007-01-11 11:20 pm UTC (link)
Thankfully, he never used THAT excuse around me, but it's no wonder that I stopped being friends with him. Fast. The fact that all of his little friends were from under priviliged families did not endear the 'but I'm helping their life get better by giving them attention' excuse to me at all.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]thekiwiwhoflew
2007-01-12 08:09 am UTC (link)
Geeze, Under priviliged families D= That fucker. Good thing you got away from him!

(Reply to this)(Parent)


(Read comments) -

 
   
Privacy Policy - COPPA
Legal Disclaimer - Site Map