Log In

Home
    - Create Journal
    - Update
    - Download

LiveJournal
    - News
    - Paid Accounts
    - Contributors

Customize
    - Customize Journal
    - Create Style
    - Edit Style

Find Users
    - Random!
    - By Region
    - By Interest
    - Search

Edit ...
    - Personal Info &
      Settings
    - Your Friends
    - Old Entries
    - Your Pictures
    - Your Password

Developer Area

Need Help?
    - Lost Password?
    - Freq. Asked
      Questions
    - Support Area



itsirtou ([info]itsirtou) wrote in [info]otf_wank,
@ 2007-01-10 17:28:00


Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry

Over at the libertarianism community on ElJay, [info]lefthandedninja asks, "Do you think possessing child pornography should be a crime?"  in reaction to this article.  (Apparently, instead of turning in his final exam, some dumbass turned in a CD full of child porn.)

Fantastic.

[info]kadeshaderow gets things started off the right way by asking, "Are you fucking retarded?" and then continues to splooge all over the place.  (Now with bolding and underlining action!) 

The wank then moves on to whether or not the age of consent is arbitrary, and whether that even pertains to the subject at hand since the CD turned in contained pictures of very young children.

[info]vox_soli feels the need to tl;dr to the max about how she is an anarchist and actually SAYS, "I more or less think that it's okay as long as the child in question has a sufficiently mature understanding of the whole idea of sexuality to consent and there isn't any question of coercion or undue influence from an authority figure."   She, [info]cyclotron, and [info]ragnarok20 go on to have a nice healthy debate over whether or not you can define a law if you don't actually believe in laws.

But!  [info]ragnarok20 simply cannot take this lying down!  Instead of replying on the first post, he has to make a whole new post about how big of an idiot [info]kadeshaderow is.

Thankfully, this post looks semi splooge-free at the moment, but the second the usual suspects show up, it'll explode, mark my words. 



(Read comments) - (Post a new comment)


[info]taktuk
2007-01-11 04:50 pm UTC (link)
KoL is one of those things which should never have serious smutfic written for it, but despite that, guess what was going through my head? There'd still be a way to make it funny, I just know it.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]photosinensis
2007-01-11 06:03 pm UTC (link)
KoL and serious should never be involved in the same sentence. Nor should KoL and smut. I mean, seriously, how would KoL smut work? King Ralph/Naughty Sorceress? Or a Council of Loathing gang-bang? And suddenly, I've got to bleach my brain after those last two thoughts. Perhaps Pastamancer/Sauceror--which would mean yaoi between my two characters.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]taktuk
2007-01-11 06:54 pm UTC (link)
I once had a list of KoL pick-up lines based on class.

"I club seals. You club seals. We bang seals together?"

That's about all I can remember, aside from one friend being glad I didn't make any squeezebox puns for AT.

That said, it makes me wonder exactly HOW one goes about taming turtles, and if peanut butter is involved.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]photosinensis
2007-01-11 07:01 pm UTC (link)
Obviously, turtles are tamed by beating them with sticks. However, this isn't very effective, as they do have hard shells.

My question is how disco bandits are involved in boozemaking.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]taktuk
2007-01-11 07:49 pm UTC (link)
Disco, like many fine fermented beverages, only improves with age.

Yeah, I got nothin'.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]influencethis
2007-01-11 08:48 pm UTC (link)
Hey! I'll have you know the eyemask has several pockets made for liquor. I love me my ice cold foties.

...I mean, uh, this isn't the booze you're looking for.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]photosinensis
2007-01-11 08:57 pm UTC (link)
Eh, I'm a food and noodle person myself. This is why my next ascension will be as a teetotaler, and I'm making Pastamancy permanent.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]taktuk
2007-01-12 12:58 pm UTC (link)
Ascensions 1 and 2 were Pastamstery and Advanced Saucecrafting respectively, here. My multi Amaguq, not having gone through hardcore much, already has the complete (FUN STUFF WITH NOODLES!) skill tree.

As a player who hates redundant bits a great deal, might want to wait for the last PM skill and perm that first, so you don't need to stick around much after the endgame.

'Least, I've done similar with a few HC runs.

So, bets on how many sleaze wads we could get by pulverizing the comm post that started it all?

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]photosinensis
2007-01-12 05:35 pm UTC (link)
That actually might be a good idea.

However, I'm a bit stuck at trying to get into the Naughty Sorceress' lair. I seem to be having trouble obtaining a quantum egg so that I can get some stuff. I can't adventure amongst the giants for very long without getting beaten to a pulp, and I can't quite buff my moxie enough to get a no-hit situation. Also, those giants don't have an elemental weakness, which makes things far more difficult.

As for pulverizing the comm post that started it all, I think we could probably get five sleaze wads. The question becomes whether we can find a seal clubber willing to share, and whether we can take that kind of slpleen damage.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]taktuk
2007-01-12 11:06 pm UTC (link)
Well, getting a quantum egg is a rather huge task, yes.

If you're not in hardcore, there's always the mall for those needed items, which are always cheaper in their final form, considering the way things go.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]photosinensis
2007-01-12 11:40 pm UTC (link)
They're not stocked or sellable in the mall, dammit.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]taktuk
2007-01-12 11:43 pm UTC (link)
Not the egg, but the rather stellar items you need to finish your quest which one could use the egg to make the item to farm for them.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]photosinensis
2007-01-12 11:45 pm UTC (link)
Already looked. Not so much with the possible. It's not makeable.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


(Read comments) -

 
   
Privacy Policy - COPPA
Legal Disclaimer - Site Map