(Read comments) - (Post a new comment)

	Some people here seem to have missed an important part of themercymachine 2007-01-20 05:44 am UTC (link)
	The OP's post that really annoyed people. Secondly, I don't have the opportunity to spend all my time reading every post in this community, and I have been mostly just read the groups on my friend's list, since I tend to spend more time on LJ. (Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

	Re: Some people here seem to have missed an important part of sepiamagpie 2007-01-20 05:49 am UTC (link)
	You're still not funny. What the hell? (Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

	Emotional themercymachine 2007-01-20 05:54 am UTC (link)
	Aren't you? (Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

	Re: Emotional sepiamagpie 2007-01-20 05:55 am UTC (link)
	It's part of my princess powers. (Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

	Re: Emotional thesilentsenshi 2007-01-20 09:01 am UTC (link)
	That icon is so full of win! Might I steal it? ^^; offers internet cookies (Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

	Re: Emotional sepiamagpie 2007-01-20 09:03 am UTC (link)
	aw, sure. It was made by littlebitca. (Reply to this)(Parent)

Re: Some people here seem to have missed an important part of

snacky
2007-01-20 05:53 am UTC (link)

Okay, but the place to be really annoyed is in your own journal or in the comm. Not here.

And fair enough, but now that you've seen it, do you think you'll be able to stop?

Also, here's something you've missed: you haven't hurt anyone here's feelings. You were being offered a box of tissues because you're splooging all over the place and you might want to clean up after yourself. Another reason I asked if you were new, since that's a long-standing joke here.

Now, you can stop being so defensive and realize you're being wanktastic, just like we all have been from time to time, and join in the laughing over people getting so worked up over, what is, when you take a step back, a fairly minor issue; or you can continue to be outraged and shrieky over telemarketers, and we'll keep laughing at you. Your choice.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

Some of you are really good as misreading things, aren't you?

themercymachine
2007-01-20 05:59 am UTC (link)

Which is understandable, considering that this is the internet, and we're only using text to convey meaning.

Now, you can stop being so defensive and realize you're being wanktastic

I'm not the one who is being the defensive one, and I consider moderators who call members things such as "whores" a sign that they might be losing control, but if you guys want to keep adding to the wank, go on right ahead.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

	Re: Some of you are really good as misreading things, aren't you? panthea 2007-01-20 06:07 am UTC (link)
	Laughing it is, then. (Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

	Re: Some of you are really good as misreading things, aren't you? panthea 2007-01-20 06:24 am UTC (link)
	...dammit, I knew I had a better icon to use than that one. WOE :( (Reply to this)(Parent)

	Okay! snacky 2007-01-20 06:08 am UTC (link)
	Since you seem to not be understanding anything I'm trying to explain, and are determined to believe you're in the right, and we're all attacking and misreading you, I'm done here. Carry on with your wanky rage over the evil of telemarketers, and we'll all carry on being amused. (Reply to this)(Parent)

	GIP! tez 2007-01-20 06:15 am UTC (link)
	'Nuff said. (Reply to this)(Parent)

	Re: Some of you are really good as misreading things, aren't you? ecchaniz0r 2007-01-20 06:50 am UTC (link)
	So we're interrogating your masturbation and pathetic attempts at wittiness from the wrong perspective? Whatever you say, hoss. (Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

	Re: Some of you are really good as misreading things, aren't you? panthea 2007-01-20 07:04 am UTC (link)
	I don't think logic is s/h/it's first language. (Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

	Re: Some of you are really good as misreading things, aren't you? artimusdin 2007-01-20 07:22 am UTC (link)
	I don't s/h/it's the least bit familiar with that language at all, actually. (Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

	Re: Some of you are really good as misreading things, aren't you? puipui 2007-01-20 08:44 am UTC (link)
	S/h/it could at least have the decency to try babelfishing it. (Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

	Re: Some of you are really good as misreading things, aren't you? artimusdin 2007-01-20 08:51 am UTC (link)
	I don't think even bablefish could translate logic into a language she'd understand. (Reply to this)(Parent)

	Re: Some of you are really good as misreading things, aren't you? puipui 2007-01-20 08:42 am UTC (link)
	Damn. Sep's right. You are a whore. (Reply to this)(Parent)

	Re: Some of you are really good as misreading things, aren't you? emiweebee 2007-01-20 07:18 pm UTC (link)
	Welcome to JF, where "whore" is less a sign of loss of control over emotion and more a term of endearment. Thank you for playing. There always has to be a loser. (Reply to this)(Parent)

	Re: Some of you are really good as misreading things, aren't you? toph 2007-01-20 09:38 pm UTC (link)
	I wish the moderators would call me a whore. Wankas get all the fun. D: (Reply to this)(Parent)

	Re: Some people here seem to have missed an important part of sorchar 2007-01-20 07:16 am UTC (link)
	If you don't have time to keep up with the rules, you don't have time to post. (Reply to this)(Parent)

	It would probably help if you learned to stop using dragonfangirl 2007-01-20 04:32 pm UTC (link)
	Sentence fragments. (Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

	I don't know if it would annabelle_lee 2007-01-20 11:56 pm UTC (link)
	Since she's so ragey otherwise and the sentence fragments give this whole wank a touch of spammy performance art. It's almost as tasty as copypasta. (Reply to this)(Parent)

(Read comments) -