Chaos|Kind metametametameta (chaoskind) wrote in

otf_wank,
@ 2004-01-12 04:16:00

LJ drama drama
...and first post by me :)

Futhman, who is very heavy himself, has not a love for camwhores with curves. Also he has nothing to do, whilst really sitting around the house, wich is why he takes a F/O post by said cam whore and posts it along with a non catty, non snarky, but 100% stupid, attention whorish bashment of the actually rather beautiful woman.

The LJ darma guests find it not funny and below LJD standards, wich is IMHO keeping it allways at step over the clients posted about.

Another LJD person HepKitten deletes the post, and get a lot of kudOs for this cleansing action.
Futhman thinks, she is a sucker for popular opinion......

hep,

i really think you're selling out to popular opinion here.

a) the friends-only post rule must have been added at some point after most of us joined, because i sure as fuck never heard of it.

b) we've done several friends-only posts here. i don't remember many of them since i've got a shitty memory and i'm not about to search through the archives, but it's been done multiple times. the two times that i remember are in the glexi poophole drama when we posted the text of her friends-only entry, and samia's famous exit with that post where someone pointed out stuff about scarlet's online life.

c) my entry was not lame, but that's a matter of opinion and if you think it was that's fine. it was definitely less lame though than 50% of the posts we see these days, i.e. pretty much every post that dan doesn't do.

d) if, however, you think that that girl is lovely, then you've got something seriously wrong with you. (or at least this is not the hep i know).

at the end of the day i really don't care about my post getting deleted. but i honestly don't see your reasoning, since it was a lot less lame than most of the drama these days, and the friends-only rule is something we've broken multiple times in the past as well. and the fact that i don't understand your reasoning bothers me.

love,
arafat.

DRama within LJ drama: It doesn't get better^^
Or meta-isher :)

(Post a new comment)

	wolfsamurai 2004-01-12 04:46 am UTC (link)
	I love when staff at LJDrama get taken to task for doing something lame (which they do more often than not IMO). Makes me have some faith in the universe. (Reply to this)

	dunc 2004-01-12 05:44 am UTC (link)
	Who wanks the wankers? Oh right... We do! Aww. Poor little asshole. If it's a 'matter of opinion' why is 'something seriously wrong' with hep for deleting it? (Reply to this)(Thread)

	ataniell93 2004-01-12 07:04 am UTC (link)
	Yeah, well, I've known hepkitten since I was on several local Goth mailing lists with her and believe me, she is a masterclass wanka. Not that I'm not or anything, but when I see her name I expect wankage. (Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

	dunc 2004-01-12 05:53 pm UTC (link)
	Greeat. Oh well. LJ Drama needs to live up to the name, don't they? "Two wanks enter... One wank leaves." (Reply to this)(Parent)

	feenix 2004-01-12 05:52 pm UTC (link)
	This is why I've given up on LJDrama. It's just really, really lame. (Reply to this)

	schuldig 2004-01-13 01:23 am UTC (link)
	I hate LJDrama. They are wankier than the wank they point out. I can't stand their attitude. And laughing at someone just because they're a little chubby (or might be) is lame, as most of their drama seems to centre around that these days. Give me otf_wank any day. (Reply to this)(Thread)

	chaoskind 2004-01-13 03:21 am UTC (link)
	yeah @fat drama. I think Arafat wanted to sound cool as in "Look, I'm fat, and I post fat drama, see, how much I beat the American set of moral rules" (whoah, there is a word for it, but I can't remember it) by pretending, that he is so much in teh face of political correctness. Oh snap! I also start to miss the days, when they dug out the real drama ._. (Reply to this)(Parent)

(Anonymous)
2004-01-14 03:59 pm UTC (link)

hahahahaha!!!

i was linked to this from a friend's journal.
that's such a lame post that at first i almost couldn't be bothered to respond. but then i realized that you guys are LJDrama knockoffs in a site that's not even livejournal. no, you're such pussies that you know you wouldn't be able to hack it with the real cutters and fatties in LJ land and so fuck around in an exact replica of livejournal which is not livejournal. but that's neither here nor there.

obviously, i can't compete with someone who can't spell "which" or "always." especially among a bunch of fucksticks who proudly use a catchphrase verb-- "wankage." it doesn't get any more original than this, folks!

but in response to dunc-- there wasn't anything "seriously wrong" with hep in deleting it, there was something "seriously wrong" in her thinking that the chubster was hot. this is the kind of reasoning that'll keep you out of community college.

ataniel93: yeah, well, hep don't know you exist.

and the rest of you, like say feenix, who's given up on ljdrama "because it's really, really lame", well, you're the ones trying to emulate from LJDrama and form a similar community, minus the panache, website, design, style, wit, and non-retards! so uh HELLO i am a kettle and you are a nigger.

and finally, chaoskind, you missed the point of the joke. just like missed the meaning of the word "meta" (short for metatextual) when you wrote this.

anyway, you guys are all losers but thanks for giving me a laugh. this doesn't mean that you can't not die though!

warm regards,
yr browny pal,
arafat kazi AKA www.livejournal.com/users/futhman

(Reply to this)(Thread)

	pipssister 2004-01-14 08:07 pm UTC (link)
	no, you're such pussies that you know you wouldn't be able to hack it with the real cutters and fatties in LJ land and so fuck around in an exact replica of livejournal which is not livejournal. Ooooooooooh... that HURTS! Or not. Actually, fandom_wank got kicked out of livejournal. (Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

	(Anonymous) 2004-01-15 09:50 pm UTC (link)
	and i'm sure nobody cared then either. - arafat (Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

	pipssister 2004-01-16 02:24 am UTC (link)
	Or not. (Reply to this)(Parent)

	chaoskind 2004-01-15 12:16 am UTC (link)
	We learn from the best :) (Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

	(Anonymous) 2004-01-15 09:51 pm UTC (link)
	too bad the best are such shitty teachers! (Reply to this)(Parent)

	(Anonymous) 2004-01-14 10:54 pm UTC (link)
	This is pathetic. Get a new idea already. You aren't meta. -hep (Reply to this)(Thread)

	chaoskind 2004-01-15 12:21 am UTC (link)
	When you make a movie on making a movie, that is a meta movie. So a drama within the drama central would be a metadrama. Or not :) (Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

	(Anonymous) 2004-01-15 09:52 pm UTC (link)
	jesus fuck, why don't you go look it up already? - metafuth (Reply to this)(Parent)

NOT IN OUR LEAGUE

(Anonymous)
2004-01-15 09:54 pm UTC (link)

and furthermore, don't think that you're part of the "drama central." that's like me saying that i enjoy the writings of p g wodehouse and john milton and so i'm part of the "world's best writers central."
what you are a part of is "stupid idiot jerkfucks who aspire to be something they can't be until they suddenly turn funny and learn how to spell but fat chance of that ever happening" central.

and yet once more,
futh.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

Re: NOT IN OUR LEAGUE

chaoskind
2004-01-16 05:32 pm UTC (link)

Wheer do you get the idea of, that I want to be part of the socalled "drama central"? I want to be part of the "Post occasional might be drama, she thinks is funny, and wich others may or may not find funny"

I read LJ drama on a regular basis, and most of it I like. I don't like drama, that is based on people being overweight or ugluy or both and posting nude pictures, I find it irrelevant, so in most occasions I just overlook it. There has been a lot of it lately on LJD, this was, why I said, yeah, they should dig out something else. Your post I found repellant. When internal (within = meta, to be found at dictionary.com) discussion broke out, I decided to post it here. Because it is drama, and noone has posted it here before to add to the pile. Not, because I get my proverbial dick off or I want to climb some steps into some Big Name heaven.

So I got the reason, why you posted the drivel wrong. Then educate me, why did you do it? Other than you found her face and body fugly.

On the other hand: Does it matter, why you posted it, and does it matter, that I didn't like it?

I think not :)

(Reply to this)(Parent)

	chaoskind 2004-01-15 12:22 am UTC (link)
	...so, no I'm not meta.... (Reply to this)(Parent)

	But...... chaoskind 2004-01-16 10:07 pm UTC (link)
	....all you, who type better than I (and probably have English at at least their second language, and use to type with their hands and not their broken appendix as I do) can now get a LJD account and post fun drama. In the meantime I will search the Net for more definitions on the word "meta" and look over at LJD from time to time :) (Reply to this)(Thread)

	Re: But...... (Anonymous) 2004-01-18 04:02 am UTC (link)
	http://dictionary.oed.com/entrance.dtl (Reply to this)(Parent)

	(Anonymous) 2004-01-18 05:09 am UTC (link)
	http://homepage.mac.com/dataguy42/pel/ (Reply to this)