Log In

Home
    - Create Journal
    - Update
    - Download

LiveJournal
    - News
    - Paid Accounts
    - Contributors

Customize
    - Customize Journal
    - Create Style
    - Edit Style

Find Users
    - Random!
    - By Region
    - By Interest
    - Search

Edit ...
    - Personal Info &
      Settings
    - Your Friends
    - Old Entries
    - Your Pictures
    - Your Password

Developer Area

Need Help?
    - Lost Password?
    - Freq. Asked
      Questions
    - Support Area



Lotte Claire ([info]lottelita) wrote in [info]otf_wank,
@ 2007-02-03 09:28:00


Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
OMFG BEWBZ!!!
I'm sorry, but this never gets old for me.

Potentially-underage boobs on Cute Overload. Surprise surprise, the readers wank.

Also, GIP.


(Read comments) - (Post a new comment)


[info]rhrsoulmates
2007-02-03 08:48 pm UTC (link)
I can see how small animals may tend to crawl up their owner's stomach/chest and settle down for a cozy rest however taking a picture such as the second one is what I don't seem to *get*. Those shots, to me, seem too contrived.

Even if the pet just happens to be nestled in someone's cleavage, why take a super close-up picture of it and then post that particular view for all to see (unless that's the point). I'm not trying to sound like a prude or anything but you can take a cute picture of the animal while it is being held (first picture) or sitting anywhere but on a chest with a boob of an underage-looking girl popping out.

Hmm, I wonder if this comment requires Windex and some paper towels. ;)

(Reply to this)(Parent)


(Read comments) -

 
   
Privacy Policy - COPPA
Legal Disclaimer - Site Map