(Read comments) - (Post a new comment)

	napalmnacey 2007-02-04 09:44 am UTC (link)
	You know, now that I've had a good, long proper look at this wank? I really don't want social_retard representing those that believe in a higher power. At all. He makes us look stupid. (Reply to this)(Thread)

	thexphial 2007-02-04 06:41 pm UTC (link)
	Don't worry. I think most of the people arguing with him, myself included, believe in a higher power. (Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

	napalmnacey 2007-02-05 12:16 am UTC (link)
	I don't believe in a bearded 'Sky Daddy' as the happiestsadist so eloquently put it, but I do believe in something. It's just very hard to describe. I usually go with the "Ineffable". (Yay new Gnostic terminology!) (Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

	thexphial 2007-02-05 12:23 am UTC (link)
	I am with you on this. Ineffability for the win! (Reply to this)(Parent)

doc_lydgate
2007-02-05 02:35 am UTC (link)

I feel your pain.

It isn't even that his central "argument," i.e., absolute meaning requires some absolute measure, is in itself obviously batshit. It's that

_social_retard_ is really incapable of any nuance whatsoever, either in creating an argument or evaluating one. But that's a rant I don't want to get into.

*goes off to cure her headache with chocolate, the true measure of the the Good*

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

	napalmnacey 2007-02-05 02:59 am UTC (link)
	Yes. Chocolate. Ultimate proof (for me) that there is a God. (That and pain killers.) (Reply to this)(Parent)

	(Anonymous) 2007-02-05 07:14 am UTC (link)
	That's kinda why I've been arguing with him; I want him to stop making my side look stupid. It's weird, because a lot of us who have been arguing against what he's saying are religious, and he claims to not be. --ophelia_brown, who may just be making herself look stupid instead (Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

	napalmnacey 2007-02-06 12:38 am UTC (link)
	Nah, sometimes you gotta wank just to make yourself feel better. (Reply to this)(Parent)

(Read comments) -