Log In

Home
    - Create Journal
    - Update
    - Download

LiveJournal
    - News
    - Paid Accounts
    - Contributors

Customize
    - Customize Journal
    - Create Style
    - Edit Style

Find Users
    - Random!
    - By Region
    - By Interest
    - Search

Edit ...
    - Personal Info &
      Settings
    - Your Friends
    - Old Entries
    - Your Pictures
    - Your Password

Developer Area

Need Help?
    - Lost Password?
    - Freq. Asked
      Questions
    - Support Area



hangingfire ([info]hangingfire) wrote in [info]otf_wank,
@ 2007-02-05 13:12:00


Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
Current music:They Might Be Giants, "The End of the Tour"

Won't someone think of the CHILDREN?!
I come bearing more Lede wank. Today, the Lede posts about how the kids of today are getting an eyeful of pr0n online:

It will probably come as no surprise to most Internet users that a new survey, published in the February issue of the journal Pediatrics (an abstract is available here), found that nearly half of all young people reported exposure, intentional or otherwise, to online pornography.

Forty-two percent of the 1,500 youngsters (ages 10 to 17) who were surveyed by telephone between March and June 2006 reported such exposure. Two-thirds of those who were exposed said the exposure was “unwanted,” according to the study; the exposure occurred most often when using file-sharing programs to download images.
The very first poster in the comment thread brings the wank:
This problem would be easy to solve if mom’s behaved like moms by taking proper care of their children. Children need close parental supervision, particularly maternal, all the way through high school. They don’t get it when mom’s off working full time and returning home so tired she just wants to chill out.
And they're off!
Wow Mark- You sure feel threatened by working women… “Beats me why women think having a career is such a big deal”… How stupid are you? Your question is the same a women asking men why we need to have a career? Why don’t you stay at home and take care of kids?
And that's just the beginning.



Page 1 of 2
<<[1] [2] >>

(Post a new comment)


[info]breecita
2007-02-05 08:27 pm UTC (link)
Apparently 42% of them are thinking of you--

Nah, it's too easy.

(Reply to this)


[info]llama_treats
2007-02-05 08:30 pm UTC (link)
Forty-two percent of the 1,500 youngsters (ages 10 to 17) who were surveyed by telephone between March and June 2006 reported such exposure.

They then proceeded to ask the interviewers what they were wearing and A/S/L, accompanied by wet, slapping sounds.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]mindset, 2007-02-05 08:43 pm UTC

[info]seiberwing
2007-02-05 08:34 pm UTC (link)
Wait, so they're calling up random homes and asking 10-year-olds if they've been exposed to porn?

That's a little freaky. Educational, but freaky.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]hangingfire, 2007-02-05 08:40 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]seiberwing, 2007-02-05 08:41 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]tangentialone, 2007-02-06 05:41 am UTC

[info]kadath
2007-02-05 08:35 pm UTC (link)
All right, now how many of them are writing internet pr0n?

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2007-02-05 08:47 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]kadath, 2007-02-05 08:49 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]doc_lydgate, 2007-02-06 05:38 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]april_hurst, 2007-02-06 01:38 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2007-02-06 11:43 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]judyhazeleyes, 2007-02-06 07:01 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2007-02-06 09:42 pm UTC
... - (Anonymous), 2007-02-07 07:23 pm UTC
... - (Anonymous), 2007-02-08 12:29 am UTC

[info]elysian
2007-02-05 08:43 pm UTC (link)
Please tell me the RIAA/MPAA financed this research; it's perfect. The corruption of our youth!! Now perpetrated not only by internet pr0n, but that dark secret menace called FILE SHARING.

(Reply to this)


ealusaid
2007-02-05 08:43 pm UTC (link)
Mark has obviously never tried to get between a teenager and hir pr0n. Hell hath no fury, man.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]birene, 2007-02-05 09:05 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]token_girl, 2007-02-05 10:43 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]birene, 2007-02-06 09:18 am UTC
... - [info]yattara, 2007-02-06 03:56 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]eilisliana, 2007-02-06 02:41 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]seiberwing, 2007-02-06 04:08 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]eilisliana, 2007-02-06 04:18 am UTC
... - [info]seiberwing, 2007-02-06 04:21 am UTC

[info]harrylovesron
2007-02-05 08:46 pm UTC (link)
I have to wonder what most of that first comment had to do with the article. So... wait... porn = feminism = the downfall of society...?

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]pyratejenni, 2007-02-05 08:57 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]tez, 2007-02-05 11:52 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]bubosquared, 2007-02-06 01:52 am UTC
... - [info]akairis, 2007-02-08 07:02 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]soupspooks, 2007-02-05 09:01 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]suziecroft, 2007-02-05 09:11 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]onaga, 2007-02-05 10:14 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]littlest_lurker, 2007-02-06 01:22 am UTC
... - [info]animeg3282, 2007-02-07 05:45 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2007-02-06 03:28 am UTC

[info]southerngaelic
2007-02-05 09:02 pm UTC (link)
Obviously they have no idea that Pr0n = the purpose of the Internet.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]ayezur, 2007-02-05 10:36 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]rimrunner, 2007-02-06 03:24 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]luthe, 2007-02-06 04:12 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2007-02-06 04:09 pm UTC
... - (Anonymous), 2007-02-06 05:22 pm UTC

[info]phosfate
2007-02-05 09:15 pm UTC (link)
God knows we were never exposed to porn before the Web existed.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]breecita, 2007-02-05 10:05 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]hangingfire, 2007-02-05 10:06 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]phosfate, 2007-02-05 10:08 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]breecita, 2007-02-05 10:21 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]amxjm, 2007-02-05 10:46 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]breecita, 2007-02-05 11:29 pm UTC
... - pastri_archy, 2007-02-06 03:16 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]braisinhussy, 2007-02-06 01:43 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]funwithrage, 2007-02-06 02:53 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]livii, 2007-02-06 05:53 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]loonylupinlover, 2007-02-06 06:19 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]singe, 2007-02-06 03:24 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]semirecluse, 2007-02-06 05:54 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]v_digitalwytch, 2007-02-06 06:53 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]singe, 2007-02-06 01:50 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]kaen, 2007-02-06 08:08 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]metal_dog5, 2007-02-07 02:00 am UTC

[info]ladybirdsleeps
2007-02-05 09:15 pm UTC (link)
Two-thirds of those who were exposed said the exposure was “unwanted"

Suuuuuuuuuure.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]hallidae, 2007-02-05 09:29 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2007-02-06 12:24 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2007-02-06 04:59 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]doc_lydgate, 2007-02-06 05:47 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]dragonfangirl, 2007-02-06 01:48 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2007-02-06 01:59 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]silrana, 2007-02-07 01:18 pm UTC

[info]puipui
2007-02-05 09:33 pm UTC (link)
Forty-two percent of the 1,500 youngsters (ages 10 to 17) who were surveyed by telephone between March and June 2006 reported such exposure.

Oh, yeah, there's a believable study right there.


EMBARRASSED TEENAGE PHONE SURVEY DRONE: Have you ever seen... um... [audible blushing] adult content [more blushing] online?

GIGGLY THIRTEEN-YEAR-OLD: [giggles] Um... [giggles some more] Yeah. [more giggling]

GIGGLY THIRTEEN-YEAR-OLD'S GIGGLY FRIENDS IN THE BACKGROUND: [lots of giggling]

ETPSD: Um... and was that... um... willingly? Or... um...

GTYO: [lots of giggling]

GTYOGFITB: [copious amounts of giggling]

GTYO: Um...

GTYOGFITB: [frenzied whispering] Blame your brother! Blame your brother! [maniacal giggling]

GTYO: No, like, um... [giggling] My older brother totally made me look. [failed attempts to stifle giggling]

ETPSD: Um... okay.

GTYO: Are you gonna, like, arrest him or something?

GTYOGFITB: [OMG so much giggling]

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]southerngaelic, 2007-02-05 09:49 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]rhrsoulmates, 2007-02-05 11:05 pm UTC
(no subject) - iwanttobeasleep, 2007-02-05 11:38 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]toph, 2007-02-06 12:08 am UTC
(no subject) - iwanttobeasleep, 2007-02-06 12:12 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]april_hurst, 2007-02-06 01:47 am UTC
... - [info]bubosquared, 2007-02-06 01:54 am UTC
... - iwanttobeasleep, 2007-02-06 06:04 am UTC
... - [info]dragonfangirl, 2007-02-06 01:50 pm UTC
... - [info]eilisliana, 2007-02-06 02:46 am UTC
... - [info]doc_lydgate, 2007-02-06 05:50 am UTC
... - [info]digigirl132, 2007-02-06 03:32 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]ironymaiden, 2007-02-06 04:50 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]radiotrash, 2007-02-07 05:04 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]mistal, 2007-02-06 01:46 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]drhenryjekyll, 2007-02-06 02:15 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]cinnamonical, 2007-02-06 05:25 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]livii, 2007-02-06 05:52 am UTC

[info]wrongly_amused
2007-02-05 10:14 pm UTC (link)
Internet Porn: in ur computerz, corruptin' ur kidz, amirite?

If that report has any other flaws, the least of its most obvious is its failure to analyze or even speculate whether these kids have been exposed to sexual content from other mediums prior to their Internet experience.

(Reply to this)


[info]ayezur
2007-02-05 10:39 pm UTC (link)
If a kid is old enough to be lookin' at the porns for purposes other than grossing themselves or their friends out, they're probably of the age where it's officially None Of Anyone's Damn Business. Unless they're, like, inspired to rape puppies by it, in which case I would suggest psychiatric help.

/my two cents.

Is it just me, or does the Great Internet Porn Debate show up every time we start running out of things to wring our hands over for the sake of the children?

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]lerefuge, 2007-02-05 10:50 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]influencethis, 2007-02-05 11:12 pm UTC
wtfff I can't do html - [info]dandywolves, 2007-02-05 11:20 pm UTC
(no subject) - iwanttobeasleep, 2007-02-05 11:35 pm UTC
... - [info]hallidae, 2007-02-06 01:57 am UTC

[info]saralina25
2007-02-05 11:26 pm UTC (link)
By a show of hands, how many of us had our first pr0n experience due to our parents (or some other adult) leaving it out in the open for us to find?

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - iwanttobeasleep, 2007-02-05 11:32 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2007-02-05 11:33 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]tez, 2007-02-05 11:53 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]squib, 2007-02-06 02:21 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]onaga, 2007-02-05 11:58 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]april_hurst, 2007-02-06 01:54 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]toph, 2007-02-06 12:10 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]saralina25, 2007-02-06 12:30 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]seiberwing, 2007-02-06 04:03 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2007-02-06 04:38 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2007-02-06 04:42 am UTC
... - [info]toph, 2007-02-06 06:06 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]harrylovesron, 2007-02-06 04:47 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]toph, 2007-02-06 06:08 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]doc_lydgate, 2007-02-06 05:54 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]toph, 2007-02-06 06:12 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]evilsqueakers, 2007-02-06 06:39 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]sheep, 2007-02-06 12:16 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]napalmnacey, 2007-02-06 01:11 am UTC
(no subject) - ealusaid, 2007-02-06 01:18 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]saralina25, 2007-02-06 01:26 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]wrongly_amused, 2007-02-06 01:42 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]chibikaijuu, 2007-02-06 01:24 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]made_by_kali, 2007-02-06 01:26 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]alpheratz, 2007-02-06 01:27 am UTC
Yup! - [info]lottelita, 2007-02-06 01:32 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]hallidae, 2007-02-06 02:21 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]delarina, 2007-02-06 02:50 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]doc_lydgate, 2007-02-06 05:57 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]ashu, 2007-02-06 02:53 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]yattara, 2007-02-06 04:01 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]ashu, 2007-02-07 06:34 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]seiberwing, 2007-02-06 08:47 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]ashu, 2007-02-07 06:35 am UTC
... - [info]seiberwing, 2007-02-07 05:08 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]big_bad_wolf, 2007-02-06 11:26 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]ashu, 2007-02-07 06:35 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]nekoneko, 2007-02-06 02:59 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2007-02-06 03:22 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]scootermcgaffin, 2007-02-06 06:50 am UTC
*waves* - [info]singe, 2007-02-06 03:54 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]harrylovesron, 2007-02-06 04:50 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]mary_mac, 2007-02-07 06:17 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]ironymaiden, 2007-02-06 04:55 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]ironymaiden, 2007-02-06 05:02 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]belafarinrod, 2007-02-06 03:06 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2007-02-07 02:33 am UTC
... - [info]ironymaiden, 2007-02-07 02:48 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]aeanagwen, 2007-02-06 05:20 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]ironymaiden, 2007-02-07 02:55 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]grand_sealink, 2007-02-06 05:24 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]thoms, 2007-02-06 06:16 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2007-02-07 05:08 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]evilsqueakers, 2007-02-06 06:47 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]pyratejenni, 2007-02-06 07:20 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]splorch, 2007-02-06 05:45 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]pyratejenni, 2007-02-06 08:04 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]lerefuge, 2007-02-06 07:25 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]qem_chibati, 2007-02-06 08:10 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]dragonfangirl, 2007-02-06 01:54 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2007-02-06 03:27 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]phosfate, 2007-02-06 03:28 pm UTC
Read me the kama sutra, grandma! - (Anonymous), 2007-02-06 04:02 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]panthea, 2007-02-06 04:08 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]lessis, 2007-02-06 04:30 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2007-02-06 04:48 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2007-02-06 05:51 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]empy, 2007-02-06 06:11 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]papervolcano, 2007-02-06 07:52 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2007-02-06 10:32 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]big_bad_wolf, 2007-02-06 11:29 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]asira, 2007-02-07 02:08 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2007-02-07 08:38 am UTC

iwanttobeasleep
2007-02-05 11:28 pm UTC (link)
I submit that anyone over the age of ten and using the Internet should know better than to expect images from a fileshare to not be pornographic. Really, screw supervision, parents should just teach their kids some common sense.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]sheep, 2007-02-06 12:17 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]ironymaiden, 2007-02-06 05:07 am UTC
Question. - [info]token_girl, 2007-02-06 02:39 pm UTC
... - [info]ironymaiden, 2007-02-06 10:04 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]pointandlaugh, 2007-02-08 01:34 am UTC

(Anonymous)
2007-02-05 11:53 pm UTC (link)
People who bitch about working moms crack me up. How exactly are you supposed to be able to afford children when you don't have a job?

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]ryuutchi, 2007-02-06 12:06 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]toph, 2007-02-06 12:11 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2007-02-06 03:30 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2007-02-06 06:40 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]yattara, 2007-02-06 04:03 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]digigirl132, 2007-02-06 06:37 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]toph, 2007-02-07 03:06 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]silrana, 2007-02-07 01:29 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]toph, 2007-02-07 03:05 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]amyheartssiroc, 2007-02-09 07:46 pm UTC

(Anonymous)
2007-02-06 12:20 am UTC (link)
By his logic, all boarding school students turn out psychopathic killers? Wow! He might be on to something! I'm already feeling the urge to kill rising!

-evilsimon

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2007-02-06 12:23 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]lyppy, 2007-02-06 02:30 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]doc_lydgate, 2007-02-06 06:01 am UTC

(Anonymous)
2007-02-06 12:36 am UTC (link)
It will probably come as no surprise to most Internet users that a new survey, published in the February issue of the journal Pediatrics (an abstract is available here), found that nearly half of all young people reported exposure, intentional or otherwise, to online pornography.

Yeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeah, one half, sure. I bet the other half was something like this:

Questioner: Have you ever been exposed to pornography online?
Teenage Boy: ...um. NO. NO, DEFINITELY NO PORN HERE NO.
Questioner (probably also a teenager): Dude, never?
Teenage Boy: YES! NO! I DON'T KNOW!
Questioner: Okay, thank you.
Teenage Boy: I WAS ON THE MOON AT THE TIME!
Questioner: ... :hangs up:
Teenage Boy: :goes back to wanking:

-creamsoda

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]keleri, 2007-02-06 02:16 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]wickedwitch, 2007-02-06 06:54 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]braska, 2007-02-06 04:40 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]tangentialone, 2007-02-06 05:10 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]grand_sealink, 2007-02-06 05:26 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2007-02-06 08:53 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]cellardoor28, 2007-02-07 04:59 pm UTC

[info]zuzu
2007-02-06 12:43 am UTC (link)
I wonder if this will make the first poster's head explode... This year my W2 shows that I made more money than my husband. We both have jobs that we really enjoy. Oh, and his job has him home during the day usually, so he takes care of the spawn.

Also, I want to fangirl your music.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]hangingfire, 2007-02-06 04:22 am UTC

[info]antimatterspork
2007-02-06 12:47 am UTC (link)
Oh come on, this is like shooting fish in a barrel.

The Internet is for porn!
The Internet is for porn!
Why you think the net was born?
PORN PORN PORN!

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]rimrunner, 2007-02-06 03:26 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]seiberwing, 2007-02-06 08:50 pm UTC

(Anonymous)
2007-02-06 01:00 am UTC (link)
Is there an option for minors who are often exposed to porn but don't give a shit either way?
Because that's what I was like at age twelve. Yey, fandom.
Also, perhaps they would have gotten more accurate answers from, say, age 14 and up? Because before I stopped caring after I reached puberty, porn used to scare the crap out of me. :/

meammouse

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]dragonfangirl, 2007-02-06 01:58 pm UTC

(Deleted post)
(no subject) - [info]vigilanterodent, 2007-02-06 01:33 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2007-02-06 12:02 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]seiberwing, 2007-02-06 08:50 pm UTC
... - [info]issendai, 2007-02-07 05:24 am UTC
... - [info]seiberwing, 2007-02-07 05:36 am UTC
... - [info]issendai, 2007-02-07 05:44 am UTC
... - (Anonymous), 2007-02-11 05:03 am UTC
... - [info]issendai, 2007-02-11 05:20 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]suziecroft, 2007-02-06 11:08 pm UTC

[info]chibikaijuu
2007-02-06 01:30 am UTC (link)
Apparently my parents were completely aware that I was reading (really, really bad) porny fanfic at 12-14ish, but never told me until later.

I was really embarrassed when I found out, not because they caught me reading porn, but because they caught me reading crappy porn. (I almost wish they had stopped me and pointed me in the direction of better erotica, but that would have been even more life-threateningly embarrassing, and I eventually figured it out for myself, so, yeah, I'm glad they left me alone.)

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]braisinhussy, 2007-02-06 01:47 am UTC

(Anonymous)
2007-02-06 01:42 am UTC (link)
Reading the article there, and the various other article around, what seems to be going on is that "unwilling" viewing of pornography including things like file-sharing and hanging around in chatrooms and other internet socialization. In the former case, we're probably looking at situations in which a popular more-or-less innocuous item has been placed on a file-sharing network with its content replaced by pornography, or a piece of pornography has it's name replaced with something pornographic (So "The Report of the Independant Counsel" is renamed "HARRY POTTER 7 SPOILERS", for example). The kids then download the item, open it up, and rar! PORN! And since it's pornography for vandalism's sake, it's probably not much fun anyway. In the second case, we're probably looking at people posting pornographic macros or linking to pornography.

What's going on, however, is that most of these people are responding by... you know... removing the unwanted pornography and going on with their lives. They have some data that seems to connect various real issues with pornography consumption, but we've got the same issues with correlation that we always have. The interesting thing was that the numbers were higher than a similiar study in, I think, 2000. My guess is that we're looking at greater density of internet use among teenagers than any other major source.

Obviously there's also the self-reporting issue, but in these kinds of studies, you have to assume that it's more or less accurate, because the other option is to not do them.

On the wank, I think this is definately revving up for some moral panic, since Myspace seems to have fallen out of the news. My only hope is that farther down in the thread we get to hear the opinions of the eel shark on all this.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]puipui, 2007-02-06 02:43 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]elysian, 2007-02-06 03:20 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]ladybirdsleeps, 2007-02-06 04:00 am UTC
NEEDS MORE WORDS! - [info]puipui, 2007-02-06 05:14 am UTC
Re: NEEDS MORE WORDS! - [info]ladybirdsleeps, 2007-02-06 05:28 am UTC
... - [info]puipui, 2007-02-06 05:08 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2007-02-06 04:28 am UTC
(no subject) - iwanttobeasleep, 2007-02-06 05:50 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]dragonfangirl, 2007-02-06 02:02 pm UTC

[info]lyppy
2007-02-06 02:33 am UTC (link)
Porn?

I thought it was called Young Adult fiction. I thought I was reading a thick book about King Arthur and then OMG WHY ARE GWEN AND LANCELOT AND ARTHUR HAVING A THREESOME?

Freakin' Mists of Avalon.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2007-02-06 03:32 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]dreamoflife02, 2007-02-06 04:19 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]hangingfire, 2007-02-06 04:24 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]evilsqueakers, 2007-02-06 06:59 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]serai, 2007-02-06 04:41 pm UTC
... - [info]evilsqueakers, 2007-02-06 08:08 pm UTC
... - [info]akairis, 2007-02-08 07:13 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]dragonfangirl, 2007-02-06 02:03 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2007-02-06 10:11 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]lyppy, 2007-02-06 03:38 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2007-02-06 05:18 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]doc_lydgate, 2007-02-06 06:09 am UTC
... - (Anonymous), 2007-02-06 03:44 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]lyppy, 2007-02-06 03:40 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]dez_chan, 2007-02-06 06:40 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]phosfate, 2007-02-06 03:31 pm UTC
... - [info]lyppy, 2007-02-06 03:42 pm UTC
... - [info]cmikhailovic, 2007-02-06 11:13 pm UTC
... - [info]phosfate, 2007-02-07 03:29 pm UTC
... - [info]pointandlaugh, 2007-02-08 01:50 am UTC
... - [info]lyppy, 2007-02-08 02:20 am UTC
... - [info]dez_chan, 2007-02-06 06:18 pm UTC
... - [info]issendai, 2007-02-07 05:58 am UTC
... - [info]phosfate, 2007-02-07 03:27 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]nekoneko, 2007-02-06 04:41 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]lyppy, 2007-02-08 02:31 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]judyhazeleyes, 2007-02-06 07:10 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]big_bad_wolf, 2007-02-06 11:22 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]seiberwing, 2007-02-06 08:53 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]lyppy, 2007-02-08 02:22 am UTC
... - [info]seiberwing, 2007-02-08 02:32 am UTC
... - [info]lyppy, 2007-02-08 04:14 am UTC
... - [info]seiberwing, 2007-02-08 04:20 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]stopthatgirl7, 2007-02-07 01:14 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]lyppy, 2007-02-08 02:30 am UTC



Page 1 of 2
<<[1] [2] >>

 
   
Privacy Policy - COPPA
Legal Disclaimer - Site Map