Log In

Home
    - Create Journal
    - Update
    - Download

LiveJournal
    - News
    - Paid Accounts
    - Contributors

Customize
    - Customize Journal
    - Create Style
    - Edit Style

Find Users
    - Random!
    - By Region
    - By Interest
    - Search

Edit ...
    - Personal Info &
      Settings
    - Your Friends
    - Old Entries
    - Your Pictures
    - Your Password

Developer Area

Need Help?
    - Lost Password?
    - Freq. Asked
      Questions
    - Support Area



hangingfire ([info]hangingfire) wrote in [info]otf_wank,
@ 2007-02-05 13:12:00


Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
Current music:They Might Be Giants, "The End of the Tour"

Won't someone think of the CHILDREN?!
I come bearing more Lede wank. Today, the Lede posts about how the kids of today are getting an eyeful of pr0n online:

It will probably come as no surprise to most Internet users that a new survey, published in the February issue of the journal Pediatrics (an abstract is available here), found that nearly half of all young people reported exposure, intentional or otherwise, to online pornography.

Forty-two percent of the 1,500 youngsters (ages 10 to 17) who were surveyed by telephone between March and June 2006 reported such exposure. Two-thirds of those who were exposed said the exposure was “unwanted,” according to the study; the exposure occurred most often when using file-sharing programs to download images.
The very first poster in the comment thread brings the wank:
This problem would be easy to solve if mom’s behaved like moms by taking proper care of their children. Children need close parental supervision, particularly maternal, all the way through high school. They don’t get it when mom’s off working full time and returning home so tired she just wants to chill out.
And they're off!
Wow Mark- You sure feel threatened by working women… “Beats me why women think having a career is such a big deal”… How stupid are you? Your question is the same a women asking men why we need to have a career? Why don’t you stay at home and take care of kids?
And that's just the beginning.


(Read comments) - (Post a new comment)


(Anonymous)
2007-02-06 12:02 pm UTC (link)
"I have compared thee, O my love, to a steed in Pharaoh's chariots."

His concubine? A horse.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]seiberwing
2007-02-06 08:50 pm UTC (link)
I'm not sure how "your navel is like a goblet of wine" counted as a compliment.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]issendai
2007-02-07 05:24 am UTC (link)
Weren't her breasts like flocks of sheep on the hillside, or am I confusing Solomon with Pratchett? It's so hard to tell sometimes.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]seiberwing
2007-02-07 05:36 am UTC (link)
No, I think the breasts were gazelles or something.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]issendai
2007-02-07 05:44 am UTC (link)
You're right, it was probably gazelles.

That makes SO MUCH MORE SENSE than sheep.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


(Anonymous)
2007-02-11 05:03 am UTC (link)
But "your hair is like a flock of goats" is in both Pratchett and Solomon.

ainself

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]issendai
2007-02-11 05:20 am UTC (link)
Hair? It was her HAIR? Breasts are merely confusing, but hair is downright insulting.

It's perfect that it was in both Solomon and Pratchett. A line like that deserves to be, uh, remembered through the ages.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]suziecroft
2007-02-06 11:08 pm UTC (link)
*ded*

(Reply to this)(Parent)


(Read comments) -

 
   
Privacy Policy - COPPA
Legal Disclaimer - Site Map