Log In

Home
    - Create Journal
    - Update
    - Download

LiveJournal
    - News
    - Paid Accounts
    - Contributors

Customize
    - Customize Journal
    - Create Style
    - Edit Style

Find Users
    - Random!
    - By Region
    - By Interest
    - Search

Edit ...
    - Personal Info &
      Settings
    - Your Friends
    - Old Entries
    - Your Pictures
    - Your Password

Developer Area

Need Help?
    - Lost Password?
    - Freq. Asked
      Questions
    - Support Area



hangingfire ([info]hangingfire) wrote in [info]otf_wank,
@ 2007-02-05 13:12:00


Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
Current music:They Might Be Giants, "The End of the Tour"

Won't someone think of the CHILDREN?!
I come bearing more Lede wank. Today, the Lede posts about how the kids of today are getting an eyeful of pr0n online:

It will probably come as no surprise to most Internet users that a new survey, published in the February issue of the journal Pediatrics (an abstract is available here), found that nearly half of all young people reported exposure, intentional or otherwise, to online pornography.

Forty-two percent of the 1,500 youngsters (ages 10 to 17) who were surveyed by telephone between March and June 2006 reported such exposure. Two-thirds of those who were exposed said the exposure was “unwanted,” according to the study; the exposure occurred most often when using file-sharing programs to download images.
The very first poster in the comment thread brings the wank:
This problem would be easy to solve if mom’s behaved like moms by taking proper care of their children. Children need close parental supervision, particularly maternal, all the way through high school. They don’t get it when mom’s off working full time and returning home so tired she just wants to chill out.
And they're off!
Wow Mark- You sure feel threatened by working women… “Beats me why women think having a career is such a big deal”… How stupid are you? Your question is the same a women asking men why we need to have a career? Why don’t you stay at home and take care of kids?
And that's just the beginning.


(Read comments) - (Post a new comment)


[info]lyppy
2007-02-06 03:42 pm UTC (link)
The Conclusion of the Classic Erotic Trilogy of Sleeping Beauty...

I got that far on Amazon.com. My Disney vision was perverted enough after Pocahontas 2. I don't need porn to go with it.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]cmikhailovic
2007-02-06 11:13 pm UTC (link)
Well, considering one of the earliest recorded versions of "Sleeping Beauty" involved the prince raping her in her sleep, and her only waking up once one of the two babies she had given birth to sucked the sleep-making splinter out of her finger, I'd say the Disney version is the perverted one. *g*

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]phosfate
2007-02-07 03:29 pm UTC (link)
"Ow! Mommy tastes like pointy."

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]pointandlaugh
2007-02-08 01:50 am UTC (link)
...what did they do to Pocahonta too? Tell me please. It's on my list of Disney Sequels I Was Afraid To Watch Due To Badness.

(Which is... most of them!)

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]lyppy
2007-02-08 02:20 am UTC (link)
Well, it was (semi) historically accurate. Pocahontas thinks that John Smith, who she totally belongs with, is dead, and then takes up with a red haired fool named John Rolf. Then she goes to England and wears powder on her face.

And even though John Smith was faking, they STILL didn't get back together. What the hell, Disney? You can't give me an epic romance in the first movie and then be all, "Oh, now they're BFFs."

(Reply to this)(Parent)


(Read comments) -

 
   
Privacy Policy - COPPA
Legal Disclaimer - Site Map