Log In

Home
    - Create Journal
    - Update
    - Download

LiveJournal
    - News
    - Paid Accounts
    - Contributors

Customize
    - Customize Journal
    - Create Style
    - Edit Style

Find Users
    - Random!
    - By Region
    - By Interest
    - Search

Edit ...
    - Personal Info &
      Settings
    - Your Friends
    - Old Entries
    - Your Pictures
    - Your Password

Developer Area

Need Help?
    - Lost Password?
    - Freq. Asked
      Questions
    - Support Area



luthe ([info]luthe) wrote in [info]otf_wank,
@ 2007-02-07 23:42:00


Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
Current mood:Petty

In Soviet New York, iPod bans you!
So a state senator in New York wants to ban using iPods while crossing city streets.

USA Today blogs about it. The comments section is a cesspool of wank, mostly of the righteous indignation kind. Watch how liberals are blamed for all society's ills! Marvel at how Darwin is misused over and over again! Gasp as accusations of communism are thrown around carelessly!

The stupid, it had to be shared.

ETA: BE MORE FUNNY, PEOPLE.



(Read comments) - (Post a new comment)


[info]chikane
2007-02-08 01:56 pm UTC (link)
So true! It always makes sense to fine the people who are visible(wearing ipods) instead of the ones actually causing the danger(car drivers who don't pay attention to traffic signs).

Not to mention that the evil iPod-rays kill dozens of baby seals each hour.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]serai
2007-02-08 06:51 pm UTC (link)
Wow, is this really so hard to understand? The point isn't to limit your freedom. The point is to make sure you don't die while you're walking around. It might be very convenient for you to walk among the cars on the road, as well, but you're not allowed to do it. Why? Because you could get HIT BY A CAR. Just because pedestrains have the right of way doesn't mean we get to do whatever we want. It's called public safety, and it's the government's job to make new laws when a new safety issue presents itself. Are the laws supposed to stay the same forever, then?

Five'll get you ten the law is being considered because there've been people who HAVE been hit by cars in that situation, who've had the nerve to sue the city for big bucks.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]tofuknight
2007-02-08 09:19 pm UTC (link)
Did you miss the part where otf_wank is to make fun of the wank, not bring it? Perhaps you misunderstood the part where people are mocking you for wanking here? Or that asking you for your views on yaoi is not really a polite question?

Though now I'd like to know; what are your thoughts on yaoi? And Alan Rickman? Hot, or not?

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]puipui
2007-02-08 09:21 pm UTC (link)
And Alan Rickman? Hot, or not?

Hot, obviously. Duh.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]big_bad_wolf
2007-02-09 12:13 am UTC (link)
I'm sure tofuknight meant to say "Hot, or scorching?".

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]puipui
2007-02-09 01:13 am UTC (link)
Ah! Yes, that makes much more sense now, thank you.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


(Read comments) -

 
   
Privacy Policy - COPPA
Legal Disclaimer - Site Map