Log In

Home
    - Create Journal
    - Update
    - Download

LiveJournal
    - News
    - Paid Accounts
    - Contributors

Customize
    - Customize Journal
    - Create Style
    - Edit Style

Find Users
    - Random!
    - By Region
    - By Interest
    - Search

Edit ...
    - Personal Info &
      Settings
    - Your Friends
    - Old Entries
    - Your Pictures
    - Your Password

Developer Area

Need Help?
    - Lost Password?
    - Freq. Asked
      Questions
    - Support Area



Nomes ([info]onaga) wrote in [info]otf_wank,
@ 2007-02-11 09:19:00


Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
Over in academics_anon, [info]kataplexis declares that accepting emailed assignments is an unfair burden for professors.

Apparently, this statement is horribly bigoted against disabled students, and wank ensues.

ETA that the post is now locked, but the comm has open membership. However, for those too lazy to bother, the text:

I don't accept assignments over email. I did once term but had a bunch of students pull the "But I emailed it to you..." line knowing that there was no way for me to confirm or refute their statement. I have since gone to a "no assignments by email" policy. I am curious to see what others think about accepting assignments over email. I don't have a tablet PC so grading it digitally is not a "perk" option. That being the case, I see no benefit and only angst to be had from accepting emailed assignments.

EDIT: Just so everyone knows that I am not some evil meanie, there are always exceptions to every rule on a syllabus to account for emergency situations or to accommodate students with disabilities that might prevent them from attending class on a certain day. Frankly, I am pretty appalled that people would think me so dim as to not have such exception. This whole straw man argument about the "emergency" and "disability" situations needs to stop. It happens on every other post and leads to nothing but trouble. By this same argument, one could say that even asking a student to attend class is discriminatory and I refuse to accept any such argument as valid.


And the response that set off much of the wank, from [info]courtney8:

I don't mean to be rude, but I really hope you have exceptions to this rule.

My case in point - I have Meniere's disease and fibromyalgia, and am considered by my university to have a valid disability that sometimes prevents me from attending class. While I understand that it is my responsibility to make up whatever work I may have missed, I sometimes have needed to email assignments to my professors in order to do this.

Not allowing emailed assignments, in some cases, could be considered discriminatory, especially when students have documented disability status through their university. Please be careful with your rules, as you may not be aware of what kinds of limitations you are placing on your students.


(Read comments) - (Post a new comment)

Re: Seems his issue isn't email per se
[info]ladyvorkosigan
2007-02-11 05:22 pm UTC (link)
Yeah, having read the post I'm a lot more sympathetic. (Although the easy way to deal with that is to send an e-mail receipt and say that if they haven't gotten that it hasn't been turned in.)

I'm also not really sure why [info]courtney8 would immediately jumpy to the conclusion that he's not making exceptions for people who legitimately can't make it to class on a given day, but whatever.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

Re: Seems his issue isn't email per se
[info]karmakaze
2007-02-11 05:53 pm UTC (link)
I think my requirement might simply be that if a student submits by email, they also must bring a copy to the next class they attend.

Back in the days before email, you called a professor, explained the situation, and brought the work in as soon as you could - and the world kept spinning.

(Reply to this)(Parent)

Re: Seems his issue isn't email per se
[info]squib
2007-02-12 07:51 am UTC (link)
Not all email does "return receipt requested", though. I've dearly wished Yahoomail had that I don't know how many times.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

Re: Seems his issue isn't email per se
[info]ladyvorkosigan
2007-02-12 07:53 pm UTC (link)
Yeah, I manually reply to the e-mails, but then I have a small class - it'd get pretty unworkable in a 450 person lecture (or even a 100 person one), so I guess it's not a universal solution.

(Reply to this)(Parent)

Re: Seems his issue isn't email per se
[info]waitwut
2007-02-13 04:16 pm UTC (link)
Well, courtney8 once actually got banned from the cross-stitch community for flaming the moderator over something, so she's a tad wanky anyway. (This was well over a year ago, I don't recall all the specifics)

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

Re: Seems his issue isn't email per se
[info]luthe
2007-02-13 05:23 pm UTC (link)
Cross-stitch wank? I'm sorry I missed it.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

Re: Seems his issue isn't email per se
[info]waitwut
2007-02-13 06:11 pm UTC (link)
We wank once in awhile when someone decides the mod is evil incarnate.

I point and laugh in my LJ with my friends.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


(Read comments) -

 
   
Privacy Policy - COPPA
Legal Disclaimer - Site Map