Log In

Home
    - Create Journal
    - Update
    - Download

LiveJournal
    - News
    - Paid Accounts
    - Contributors

Customize
    - Customize Journal
    - Create Style
    - Edit Style

Find Users
    - Random!
    - By Region
    - By Interest
    - Search

Edit ...
    - Personal Info &
      Settings
    - Your Friends
    - Old Entries
    - Your Pictures
    - Your Password

Developer Area

Need Help?
    - Lost Password?
    - Freq. Asked
      Questions
    - Support Area



Freezer - a buffet of manliness! ([info]freezer) wrote in [info]otf_wank,
@ 2007-02-18 10:53:00


Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
Camille Paglia is back, wank follows.
Props to the Wank Report mousies.

Over at Salon.com, infamous "feminist" Camille Paglia* makes her return after a six year hiatus. The second paragraph of her return column serves as a welcome mat to her fans or a warning sign to the haters, depending on your POV.


I had certainly assumed the Web was surfeited with more than enough material, but evidently many others beside myself find the partisan polarization of the blogosphere numbingly predictable and its prose too often slapdash, fragmentary or drearily prolix.


Um... What?

The Salon readers are, for the most part, going 1/3s "Yay, she's back" and 2/3s "OH HELL NO!"

For. Five. Hundred. Plus. Entries.

There are some choice potshots to be had, at Paglia herself, her haters, and a couple at Molly Irvins (whom one of the first posters referenced re: her appraisal of Paglia).

Internet commentary is serious bizness!



* Reader Rupert sums up Paglia's style thusly:

One third worthwhile insight, incisively articulated.

One third provocation for the hell of it (also worthwhile).

One third damn fool nonsense, delivered in the written-word equivalent of bombastic prog rock.

Stir up with equal parts narcissism and generosity.


Personally, I tend to think of her as the batshit liberal ying to Ann Coulter's batshit conservative yang.


(Read comments) - (Post a new comment)


[info]marciamarcia
2007-02-19 12:48 am UTC (link)
What are you referring to? I'm not really familiar with Paglia (aside from vaugely knowing who she is). I'm curious to hear more about her apparently batshit definition of feminism.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]pyratejenni
2007-02-19 02:11 am UTC (link)
She's only a feminist the way FOX News is fair and balanced.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


capybara
2007-02-19 02:35 am UTC (link)
I remember her saying (in Sexual Personae?) that women in abusive relationships stay because the sex is really good, what with violent men being so masculine and passionate and all. There was also something about rape being a result of men's uncontrollable sexual desires. So that's...feminism?

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]littlest_lurker
2007-02-19 05:28 am UTC (link)
Eww. Seriously.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


capybara
2007-02-19 05:53 am UTC (link)
Yeah, fastest library book return ever.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]footsie
2007-02-19 06:24 am UTC (link)
Yeah, that. As much as I like her when she's writing things just to see how many people she can piss off, that bit was a little too batshit even for me.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]jenny_atrox
2007-02-19 07:59 am UTC (link)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Camille_Paglia#Criticism_of_Paglia

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]jenny_atrox
2007-02-19 08:02 am UTC (link)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Camille_Paglia#Criticism_of_Paglia

(Reply to this)(Parent)


(Read comments) -

 
   
Privacy Policy - COPPA
Legal Disclaimer - Site Map