Log In

Home
    - Create Journal
    - Update
    - Download

LiveJournal
    - News
    - Paid Accounts
    - Contributors

Customize
    - Customize Journal
    - Create Style
    - Edit Style

Find Users
    - Random!
    - By Region
    - By Interest
    - Search

Edit ...
    - Personal Info &
      Settings
    - Your Friends
    - Old Entries
    - Your Pictures
    - Your Password

Developer Area

Need Help?
    - Lost Password?
    - Freq. Asked
      Questions
    - Support Area



Freezer - a buffet of manliness! ([info]freezer) wrote in [info]otf_wank,
@ 2007-02-18 10:53:00


Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
Camille Paglia is back, wank follows.
Props to the Wank Report mousies.

Over at Salon.com, infamous "feminist" Camille Paglia* makes her return after a six year hiatus. The second paragraph of her return column serves as a welcome mat to her fans or a warning sign to the haters, depending on your POV.


I had certainly assumed the Web was surfeited with more than enough material, but evidently many others beside myself find the partisan polarization of the blogosphere numbingly predictable and its prose too often slapdash, fragmentary or drearily prolix.


Um... What?

The Salon readers are, for the most part, going 1/3s "Yay, she's back" and 2/3s "OH HELL NO!"

For. Five. Hundred. Plus. Entries.

There are some choice potshots to be had, at Paglia herself, her haters, and a couple at Molly Irvins (whom one of the first posters referenced re: her appraisal of Paglia).

Internet commentary is serious bizness!



* Reader Rupert sums up Paglia's style thusly:

One third worthwhile insight, incisively articulated.

One third provocation for the hell of it (also worthwhile).

One third damn fool nonsense, delivered in the written-word equivalent of bombastic prog rock.

Stir up with equal parts narcissism and generosity.


Personally, I tend to think of her as the batshit liberal ying to Ann Coulter's batshit conservative yang.


(Read comments) - (Post a new comment)

FTMFF
[info]gun
2007-02-19 10:21 am UTC (link)
It took me quite a long time, even a number of years, before I was even able to speak openly. My God, "Sexual Personae," which is a great scholarly book for Heaven sakes, "Sexual Personae" was treated, was called... the most evil book ever written...

I refuse to comment on how fucking long her sentences are, but is this woman seriously Chancery Stone in disguise?

She has weird things about homosexuals, she thinks the world of her own writing, and her grammar and sentence construction are clunky. A quick question, as someone who's never read "Sexual Personae", but are there straight men having sex in it?

(Reply to this)(Thread)

Re: FTMFF
[info]kannaophelia
2007-02-19 10:50 am UTC (link)
If I remember, it has a bad case of OMG gay men are SO COOL, they have penises and sex in toilets and write bad poetry* and created civilisation, why can't lesbians be more like gay men? Does that qualify?

I do think we have the bad poetry down pat already, mind. Elana Dykewomon, I'm looking at *you*.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

Re: FTMFF
(Anonymous)
2007-02-21 12:29 am UTC (link)
Is Luke Sissyfag her opening act?

(Reply to this)(Parent)

Re: FTMFF
[info]seraphtrevs
2007-02-19 09:43 pm UTC (link)
Oh FFS, who called it the most "evil book ever written?" I'm thinking no one.

Although she does think its okay for men to sleep with boys:

These days, especially in America, boy-love is not only scandalous and criminal buy somehow in bad taste...As a woman, I feel free to protest that men today are pilloried for something that was rational and honorable in Greece at the height of civilization.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


(Read comments) -

 
   
Privacy Policy - COPPA
Legal Disclaimer - Site Map