Log In

Home
    - Create Journal
    - Update
    - Download

LiveJournal
    - News
    - Paid Accounts
    - Contributors

Customize
    - Customize Journal
    - Create Style
    - Edit Style

Find Users
    - Random!
    - By Region
    - By Interest
    - Search

Edit ...
    - Personal Info &
      Settings
    - Your Friends
    - Old Entries
    - Your Pictures
    - Your Password

Developer Area

Need Help?
    - Lost Password?
    - Freq. Asked
      Questions
    - Support Area



rosehiptea ([info]rosehiptea) wrote in [info]otf_wank,
@ 2007-02-25 23:56:00


Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
Current mood:Obscene
Current music:Danko Jones: Heartbreak's A Blessing

Wank! Over Naked Women!
Finding wank on deviantArt isn't so hard, I guess, but this seems to have become worse than most.

A nude photo of a woman, NOT worksafe, makes the Daily Deviations.

The first comment is a remark about the girly bits, so the wankiness starts right away. Then people start debating how good a picture it is in the first place. I'm not sure one can link individual comments on dA but the wank seems to be everywhere, at least on the first page.



chaoswolf1982: Nice dangle down there.

ChloeKytten:

that's just a rude remark!!!

Her eyes do the talking in this piece, what is she thinking of I wonder????


Then we have a long argument between Ken21 and pangwinking that I had to pick bits out of:

Ken21:

wow what? No ones talking about lens focus. Do you even know what you’re talking about? Harsh lighting, he’s using soft lights for one, and I can see just by looking at the image he has six point lighting set up. It’s ok for a photo to have shadows.

~pangwinking:
Actually no, I have no idea what I'm talking about. I'm glad I have somebody such as yourself to teach me so much about what pays my bills.



And more people give their thoughts on naked women:

LadyHellFyre:
Guess i'll add my piece. Only thing i can say is, nudity in itself is a focal point. So...when it's there, that's what it is. -shrug- Pretty obvious, i think these other people just think we're being harsh. But it's a fact o' life my friends. Dogs sniff eachother's wangs, humans are baffled with nakedness.


SojinnZero:

This piece is ridiculous. The depth of field is huge, and the eyes absolutely cannot be the focal point since they are so dark compared to the highlight on her right thigh and the white of the floor. They are subdued. The pose means nothing, being that of a brooding nature conflicting with her confused look. The clothes she is wearing don't appear to mean anything either or have been taken into consideration.

I say it's just an excuse for a nude photo.


P.S. The woman has a gigantic labia


And I love this line from clericflcl

Oh yeah. Great job everyone, and keep up the good work. Your arguments are always amusing, and the pointlessness in the fights brings new light into my day, because it makes me feel normal.

Lama Power Forever!
Clericflcl


And then it just detiorates, and that's only the front page:

Neeycko:
I think chaoswolf's comment is fine.

This is deviantart for christ's sake. If you upload something here, people are going to say whatever the hell they like.

they can call it whatever they like. You say dangle and NO ONE is confused by what you mean, in this case. I really don't see what the big deal is here.

ThisIsaTragedy:
get a fucking life.

Shelax:
You know what I call this entire string of comments, including my own? Labia Minority Report. AHAAHHAHAAHAHA. Think Spielberg will direct? Holy shit, I'm on a roll!


There's more on the other pages too, but frankly I lost steam at some point...



EDIT: For artistic purposes only!

I unfortunately forgot that one needs an account to see the "mature" content.

[info]scarah2 has kindly provided a screencap of the art. Again, NSFW!

EDIT 2: Now with redeeming social value!

In the comments here, [info]funkyhelix provides backstory about the Black Apple.




Page 1 of 2
<<[1] [2] >>

(Post a new comment)


[info]innsmouth_eyes
2007-02-26 09:56 am UTC (link)
>>Nice dangle down there.

I really must agree. The rest of this wank seems pale and boring next to the amazing dangle.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]rosehiptea, 2007-02-26 10:22 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]cinnamonical, 2007-02-26 11:24 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]cjk, 2007-02-26 12:21 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]maev_connacht, 2007-02-26 06:10 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]seldomnaughty, 2007-02-26 07:04 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]jat_sapphire, 2007-02-26 09:17 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]seiberwing, 2007-02-26 03:23 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]heddychaa, 2007-02-26 06:55 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]seiberwing, 2007-02-26 06:59 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]heddychaa, 2007-02-26 07:04 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]heddychaa, 2007-02-26 07:07 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]caffeine_fairy, 2007-02-26 09:26 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]edana_ni_emer, 2007-02-26 10:16 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]daylightsparks, 2007-02-26 10:18 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]edana_ni_emer, 2007-02-26 10:22 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]perletwo, 2007-02-27 12:50 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]rosehiptea, 2007-02-26 10:26 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]edana_ni_emer, 2007-02-26 10:30 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]littlest_lurker, 2007-02-27 12:00 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]mistressrenet, 2007-02-27 02:58 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]edana_ni_emer, 2007-02-27 03:00 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]aristaea, 2007-02-27 03:25 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]edana_ni_emer, 2007-02-27 03:28 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]aristaea, 2007-02-27 03:32 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]edana_ni_emer, 2007-02-27 03:37 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]aristaea, 2007-02-27 03:41 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]edana_ni_emer, 2007-02-27 03:45 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]aristaea, 2007-02-27 04:06 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]edana_ni_emer, 2007-02-27 04:15 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]aristaea, 2007-02-27 06:08 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]edana_ni_emer, 2007-02-27 06:17 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]rimrunner, 2007-02-27 04:59 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]edana_ni_emer, 2007-02-27 05:02 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]altoidsaddict, 2007-02-27 06:18 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]edana_ni_emer, 2007-02-27 06:21 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]altoidsaddict, 2007-02-27 06:43 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]edana_ni_emer, 2007-02-27 10:24 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]altoidsaddict, 2007-02-27 06:13 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]knightrider, 2007-03-01 09:02 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]littlest_lurker, 2007-02-27 12:02 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]heddychaa, 2007-02-26 07:17 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]seiberwing, 2007-02-26 07:18 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]heddychaa, 2007-02-26 07:22 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]seiberwing, 2007-02-26 08:19 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]jat_sapphire, 2007-02-26 09:24 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]perletwo, 2007-02-27 12:52 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]shadowkitty, 2007-02-26 10:23 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]aerobot, 2007-02-27 12:02 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]sailorjpg, 2007-02-26 07:36 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]heddychaa, 2007-02-26 07:38 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]perletwo, 2007-02-27 12:53 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]shinga, 2007-02-26 03:47 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]smo, 2007-02-26 06:32 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]april_hurst, 2007-02-27 01:06 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]rosehiptea, 2007-02-26 07:39 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]ayezur, 2007-02-26 09:34 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]stopthatgirl7, 2007-02-27 10:21 am UTC

[info]eilan
2007-02-26 10:20 am UTC (link)
I must ask: Is there any way to look at that picture and not look at the labia during the first two seconds? I certainly did. Focus on the eyes my ass...

And PSA: IT'S LABIA, NOT VAGINA!!!

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]elysian, 2007-02-26 11:28 am UTC
(no subject) - iwanttobeasleep, 2007-02-26 07:02 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]barankhy, 2007-02-26 12:13 pm UTC

[info]mojotmonkey
2007-02-26 10:31 am UTC (link)
...Wait, there's something else to the picture? Are we SURE the focus isn't the dangle?

(Reply to this)


[info]vergilsparda
2007-02-26 11:13 am UTC (link)
Naked chick as Daily Deviation. How new!

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]edgyspice, 2007-02-26 08:08 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]vergilsparda, 2007-02-27 01:51 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]edgyspice, 2007-02-27 03:02 am UTC

[info]scarah2
2007-02-26 11:18 am UTC (link)
Err... that's neither vagina nor labia, it is her clitoris.

I'm not sure because I can't see well enough, but it may be pierced which could contribute to "dangle" factor.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]kahteh, 2007-02-26 01:55 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]barankhy, 2007-02-26 02:14 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]heddychaa, 2007-02-26 06:56 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]tofuknight, 2007-02-26 08:50 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]heddychaa, 2007-02-26 08:51 pm UTC

[info]lady_red
2007-02-26 11:31 am UTC (link)
Mature Content Filter is On
---
This section of deviantART requires that you have a deviantART account.

Screenshots plz?

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]ironymaiden, 2007-02-26 11:37 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]eilan, 2007-02-26 11:49 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]bolboreta, 2007-02-26 02:16 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]smo, 2007-02-26 06:32 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]barankhy, 2007-02-27 12:27 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]rosehiptea, 2007-02-26 08:02 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]aerobot, 2007-02-26 12:56 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]scarah2, 2007-02-26 02:12 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]hallidae, 2007-02-26 03:22 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]scarah2, 2007-02-26 03:28 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]dragonfangirl, 2007-02-26 11:46 pm UTC
The female anatomy has never been more confusing. - [info]zealot, 2007-02-26 03:44 pm UTC
Re: The female anatomy has never been more confusing. - [info]scarah2, 2007-02-26 03:52 pm UTC
Re: The female anatomy has never been more confusing. - [info]heddychaa, 2007-02-26 06:58 pm UTC
Re: The female anatomy has never been more confusing. - [info]seldomnaughty, 2007-02-26 07:10 pm UTC
Re: The female anatomy has never been more confusing. - [info]heddychaa, 2007-02-26 07:12 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]rosehiptea, 2007-02-26 07:45 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]lady_red, 2007-02-28 01:34 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]rosehiptea, 2007-02-26 08:03 pm UTC

[info]aerobot
2007-02-26 12:58 pm UTC (link)
I say it's just an excuse for a nude photo.

Wait, wait, wait ... you NEED an excuse?

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]caito, 2007-02-27 06:36 am UTC

[info]funkyhelix
2007-02-26 02:23 pm UTC (link)
The back story is there was a traditional art piece that was featured for a daily deviation, and then immediately deleted for lewdness, and a lot of the community built around the DDs are still sensitive over it.

The piece was a ceramic apple glazed black, and the inside cross section was a woman's pink bits. I think the artist was ooty. It was well done and extremely popular. There was talk of it breaking pageviews per hour records. Suddenly it was deleted from the gallery without explanation to the artist or the staffer who featured it, and when the dust settled, it was claimed the black apple was too pornographic and against standards.

Since then, which was about two weeks ago, any time something looks risque, people run in and make a stink about it and ask why this isn't deleted etc, etc, lamecakes.

The whole thing over the Black Apple is a neat read. Lemme scare up links.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]funkyhelix, 2007-02-26 02:33 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]digigirl132, 2007-02-26 02:55 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]funkyhelix, 2007-02-26 04:25 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]barankhy, 2007-02-26 04:52 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]frequentmouse, 2007-02-26 04:56 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]mistressrenet, 2007-02-27 03:00 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]rosehiptea, 2007-02-26 07:44 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]mistal, 2007-02-26 03:10 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]soupspooks, 2007-02-26 05:15 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]shinga, 2007-02-26 03:19 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]heddychaa, 2007-02-26 07:37 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]luna_hoshino, 2007-02-26 10:27 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]rosehiptea, 2007-02-26 10:52 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]aristaea, 2007-02-27 03:37 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]sunhawk, 2007-02-26 10:50 pm UTC

[info]oh_envy
2007-02-26 03:05 pm UTC (link)
Hmm, it could look like a tiny penis or maybe the end of a slim, glass dildo?

And now I'm sitting here, trying to make sense of the labia/ clitoris / tiny penis by tilting my head in odd angles. Thanks

(Reply to this)


[info]shinga
2007-02-26 03:06 pm UTC (link)
OH WOW, A NUDE IS A DD. GOSH, WHATEVER WILL WE DO.

Jesus, when isn't a generic borderline-porn photo a DD?

Did ScottB feature it? I swear, that's all he does all day. Look up nekkid photos and DD them. And never the good ones, either, because DA has plenty of amazing nudes! Nono, he goes after the saaame generic "hee, boobies! hee GIGANTIC EXPOSED LABIA OF DOOM! ass shot!"

The thing is about a lot of nude DDs... there's hardly any artistic merit to them at all. It's just naked women trying to convey sexuality. Gee, where have I seen that before? Right, right, teh pronz.

I could go through the Artistic Nude section of DA and find something ten times better than this within ten seconds. Hell, I'll do it!

What about this one? Yes, very focused on Teh Boobz, but excellent color, lighting and focus. Or this, rather dark and clever and fun. Even this!

But nooo. We get the "Look at my labia; ask me how!"

*checks link again*

Yup, ScottB! I don't know WHY I bothered to ask *L*

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - iwanttobeasleep, 2007-02-26 03:48 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]soupspooks, 2007-02-26 05:15 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]rosehiptea, 2007-02-26 07:35 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]sailorjpg, 2007-02-26 07:49 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]chibikaijuu, 2007-02-27 04:51 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]visp, 2007-02-27 01:48 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]edgyspice, 2007-02-26 08:11 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]ereshkigal, 2007-02-26 09:01 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]rosehiptea, 2007-02-26 10:22 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]chibikaijuu, 2007-02-27 04:54 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]littlest_lurker, 2007-02-27 12:10 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]wrongly_amused, 2007-02-27 01:32 am UTC

[info]shinga
2007-02-26 03:12 pm UTC (link)
OH. And there is a way to link to the comments. By the commenter's name, where it has the date or time it was posted? Click that.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]rosehiptea, 2007-02-26 07:36 pm UTC

[info]lyppy
2007-02-26 04:15 pm UTC (link)
What is going on there?

(Reply to this)


[info]julesnoctambule
2007-02-26 04:31 pm UTC (link)
Wow, what a crap picture.

I'm not quite sure exactly which part of her anatomy is going on down there, but it certainly is the focus of the picture. How kind of Hustler Deviantart to brighten our days with such original art.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]heddychaa, 2007-02-26 07:13 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]julesnoctambule, 2007-02-26 09:52 pm UTC

[info]eilan
2007-02-26 04:54 pm UTC (link)
=AblativeLove needa a life.

One that doesn't include going through the whole thread and telling everyone that it's a labia minora, not a clit/vagina/small penis/labio majora.

(Reply to this)


[info]shallow_kid
2007-02-26 05:42 pm UTC (link)
Wot? I can't stop staring at her penis.

(Reply to this)


[info]smo
2007-02-26 06:13 pm UTC (link)
*does His Master's Voice impression*

Does she have a piercing? Because that's the only reason I can think of why a clitoris would... hang down like that.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]phosfate, 2007-02-26 06:35 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]wankprophet, 2007-02-26 06:41 pm UTC
(no subject) - iwanttobeasleep, 2007-02-26 06:54 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]smo, 2007-02-26 07:29 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]heddychaa, 2007-02-26 07:05 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]smo, 2007-02-26 07:26 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]heddychaa, 2007-02-26 07:27 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]caffeine_fairy, 2007-02-26 09:35 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]heddychaa, 2007-02-27 07:47 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]caffeine_fairy, 2007-02-27 08:17 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]miharu, 2007-02-28 01:08 am UTC

(Screened Post)
Re: I have little to add other than... - [info]heddychaa, 2007-02-26 07:09 pm UTC
Re: I have little to add other than... - [info]rosehiptea, 2007-02-26 07:51 pm UTC
Re: I have little to add other than... - [info]kahteh, 2007-02-26 08:50 pm UTC
Re: I have little to add other than... - [info]tangentialone, 2007-02-27 07:09 am UTC
Re: I have little to add other than... - [info]kahteh, 2007-02-27 04:19 pm UTC

[info]makeshyft
2007-02-26 09:23 pm UTC (link)
Well, got nothing to say about the wank itself.. but going by that picture..

Didn't know DTiberius was doing photography these days.. heh.

(Reply to this)


[info]demonbean
2007-02-26 09:46 pm UTC (link)
... because nude photography MUST have soft lighting. What?

(Reply to this)


[info]wrongly_amused
2007-02-27 01:27 am UTC (link)
If her eyes are doing the talking, her labia is screaming for my attention.

(Reply to this)


[info]napalmnacey
2007-02-27 03:58 am UTC (link)
You know, sometimes I'm so ashamed of my genitalia. *sigh*

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]altoidsaddict, 2007-02-27 06:21 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]napalmnacey, 2007-02-27 06:48 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]mastervex, 2007-02-27 09:44 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]napalmnacey, 2007-02-27 11:53 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]made_by_kali, 2007-02-27 02:27 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]napalmnacey, 2007-02-27 04:02 pm UTC

[info]chibikaijuu
2007-02-27 04:56 am UTC (link)
Am I the only one whe keeps staring at her nipple? (There's nothing weird about it, that's just where the composition leads me.)

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]bwthree, 2007-02-27 02:11 pm UTC

[info]tangentialone
2007-02-27 06:55 am UTC (link)
The thing I love about DA wank is that comments are there forever unless the thing they're on gets deleted.

(Reply to this)


[info]blue_penguin
2007-02-27 07:19 am UTC (link)
Eh, it's not really my style. She's too skinny and pale and vaguely gothy for me, and the pose doesn't do much for her either. If I really want porn, I've got better stuff than that bookmarked--

Oh, it was supposed to be art?

(Reply to this)


[info]altoidsaddict
2007-02-27 07:31 am UTC (link)
Wow, the Hive Vagina is the last place I'd expect for people to be concurring with the idea that a woman's labia - which in this case have no significant deviation from the wide spectrum that is the norm, despite what Playboy tells you - are freakish or wrong or should cause us to question her very gender.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]loonylupinlover, 2007-02-27 09:12 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]loonylupinlover, 2007-02-27 09:15 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]isntitironic, 2007-02-27 03:37 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]altoidsaddict, 2007-02-27 06:38 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]loonylupinlover, 2007-02-27 06:39 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]perletwo, 2007-02-28 04:34 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]altoidsaddict, 2007-02-27 06:20 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]loonylupinlover, 2007-02-27 06:24 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]mastervex, 2007-02-27 09:29 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]altoidsaddict, 2007-02-27 06:22 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]heddychaa, 2007-02-27 07:45 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]miharu, 2007-02-28 01:12 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]heddychaa, 2007-02-28 04:42 am UTC



Page 1 of 2
<<[1] [2] >>

 
   
Privacy Policy - COPPA
Legal Disclaimer - Site Map