Log In

Home
    - Create Journal
    - Update
    - Download

LiveJournal
    - News
    - Paid Accounts
    - Contributors

Customize
    - Customize Journal
    - Create Style
    - Edit Style

Find Users
    - Random!
    - By Region
    - By Interest
    - Search

Edit ...
    - Personal Info &
      Settings
    - Your Friends
    - Old Entries
    - Your Pictures
    - Your Password

Developer Area

Need Help?
    - Lost Password?
    - Freq. Asked
      Questions
    - Support Area



rosehiptea ([info]rosehiptea) wrote in [info]otf_wank,
@ 2007-02-25 23:56:00


Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
Current mood:Obscene
Current music:Danko Jones: Heartbreak's A Blessing

Wank! Over Naked Women!
Finding wank on deviantArt isn't so hard, I guess, but this seems to have become worse than most.

A nude photo of a woman, NOT worksafe, makes the Daily Deviations.

The first comment is a remark about the girly bits, so the wankiness starts right away. Then people start debating how good a picture it is in the first place. I'm not sure one can link individual comments on dA but the wank seems to be everywhere, at least on the first page.



chaoswolf1982: Nice dangle down there.

ChloeKytten:

that's just a rude remark!!!

Her eyes do the talking in this piece, what is she thinking of I wonder????


Then we have a long argument between Ken21 and pangwinking that I had to pick bits out of:

Ken21:

wow what? No ones talking about lens focus. Do you even know what you’re talking about? Harsh lighting, he’s using soft lights for one, and I can see just by looking at the image he has six point lighting set up. It’s ok for a photo to have shadows.

~pangwinking:
Actually no, I have no idea what I'm talking about. I'm glad I have somebody such as yourself to teach me so much about what pays my bills.



And more people give their thoughts on naked women:

LadyHellFyre:
Guess i'll add my piece. Only thing i can say is, nudity in itself is a focal point. So...when it's there, that's what it is. -shrug- Pretty obvious, i think these other people just think we're being harsh. But it's a fact o' life my friends. Dogs sniff eachother's wangs, humans are baffled with nakedness.


SojinnZero:

This piece is ridiculous. The depth of field is huge, and the eyes absolutely cannot be the focal point since they are so dark compared to the highlight on her right thigh and the white of the floor. They are subdued. The pose means nothing, being that of a brooding nature conflicting with her confused look. The clothes she is wearing don't appear to mean anything either or have been taken into consideration.

I say it's just an excuse for a nude photo.


P.S. The woman has a gigantic labia


And I love this line from clericflcl

Oh yeah. Great job everyone, and keep up the good work. Your arguments are always amusing, and the pointlessness in the fights brings new light into my day, because it makes me feel normal.

Lama Power Forever!
Clericflcl


And then it just detiorates, and that's only the front page:

Neeycko:
I think chaoswolf's comment is fine.

This is deviantart for christ's sake. If you upload something here, people are going to say whatever the hell they like.

they can call it whatever they like. You say dangle and NO ONE is confused by what you mean, in this case. I really don't see what the big deal is here.

ThisIsaTragedy:
get a fucking life.

Shelax:
You know what I call this entire string of comments, including my own? Labia Minority Report. AHAAHHAHAAHAHA. Think Spielberg will direct? Holy shit, I'm on a roll!


There's more on the other pages too, but frankly I lost steam at some point...



EDIT: For artistic purposes only!

I unfortunately forgot that one needs an account to see the "mature" content.

[info]scarah2 has kindly provided a screencap of the art. Again, NSFW!

EDIT 2: Now with redeeming social value!

In the comments here, [info]funkyhelix provides backstory about the Black Apple.



(Read comments) - (Post a new comment)


[info]innsmouth_eyes
2007-02-26 09:56 am UTC (link)
>>Nice dangle down there.

I really must agree. The rest of this wank seems pale and boring next to the amazing dangle.

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]rosehiptea
2007-02-26 10:22 am UTC (link)
Yeah, I didn't want to admit it but "dangle" was pretty much my first thought when I saw the pic too. So I'm not shocked that someone actually said it instead of commenting on the lighting or her eyes.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]cinnamonical
2007-02-26 11:24 am UTC (link)
Seconded. Dang...le.

*goes off to finish her perspective homework*

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]cjk
2007-02-26 12:21 pm UTC (link)
Thirded. It's... really strange. Maybe it's the angle?

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]maev_connacht
2007-02-26 06:10 pm UTC (link)
Well, the angle of the dangle is inversely proportional to the heat of the beat.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]seldomnaughty
2007-02-26 07:04 pm UTC (link)
Aaaand there goes my water, all over my monitor. *cracks up*

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]jat_sapphire
2007-02-26 09:17 pm UTC (link)
Danny Kaye, is that you?

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]seiberwing
2007-02-26 03:23 pm UTC (link)
What IS that?

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]heddychaa
2007-02-26 06:55 pm UTC (link)
It's her labia.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]seiberwing
2007-02-26 06:59 pm UTC (link)
But labias don't work that way!

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]heddychaa
2007-02-26 07:04 pm UTC (link)
Yes, yes they do. Would you like me to take a picture of my own, or will you be satisfied by knowing that not all vaginas are built one way?

http://www.rotten.com/library/sex/elongated-labia/



There. There's a whole website about it. Dangling inner labia.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]heddychaa
2007-02-26 07:07 pm UTC (link)
and sorry if that came out catty. didn't mean for it to. XD


It just doesn't show up in porn at all because westerners think it's "ugly". Women get plastic surgery to "fix" it.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]caffeine_fairy, 2007-02-26 09:26 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]edana_ni_emer, 2007-02-26 10:16 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]daylightsparks, 2007-02-26 10:18 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]edana_ni_emer, 2007-02-26 10:22 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]perletwo, 2007-02-27 12:50 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]rosehiptea, 2007-02-26 10:26 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]edana_ni_emer, 2007-02-26 10:30 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]littlest_lurker, 2007-02-27 12:00 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]mistressrenet, 2007-02-27 02:58 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]edana_ni_emer, 2007-02-27 03:00 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]aristaea, 2007-02-27 03:25 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]edana_ni_emer, 2007-02-27 03:28 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]aristaea, 2007-02-27 03:32 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]edana_ni_emer, 2007-02-27 03:37 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]aristaea, 2007-02-27 03:41 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]edana_ni_emer, 2007-02-27 03:45 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]aristaea, 2007-02-27 04:06 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]edana_ni_emer, 2007-02-27 04:15 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]aristaea, 2007-02-27 06:08 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]edana_ni_emer, 2007-02-27 06:17 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]rimrunner, 2007-02-27 04:59 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]edana_ni_emer, 2007-02-27 05:02 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]altoidsaddict, 2007-02-27 06:18 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]edana_ni_emer, 2007-02-27 06:21 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]altoidsaddict, 2007-02-27 06:43 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]edana_ni_emer, 2007-02-27 10:24 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]altoidsaddict, 2007-02-27 06:13 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]knightrider, 2007-03-01 09:02 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]littlest_lurker, 2007-02-27 12:02 am UTC

[info]heddychaa
2007-02-26 07:17 pm UTC (link)
And yes, I just realized that I linked to rotten.com XD It's an accurate article, though, so eh!

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]seiberwing
2007-02-26 07:18 pm UTC (link)
*reads* All right, so apparently they do work that way.

And no, I'll simply take your word for it. No pictures are needed.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]heddychaa, 2007-02-26 07:22 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]seiberwing, 2007-02-26 08:19 pm UTC

[info]jat_sapphire
2007-02-26 09:24 pm UTC (link)
It's the shaving, I think...the shaving and how tiny her outer labia are. I had to look twice, too--it looked like a protruding toy.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]perletwo, 2007-02-27 12:52 am UTC

[info]shadowkitty
2007-02-26 10:23 pm UTC (link)
How about we go ask [info]ataniell rather than bringing any more vaginas into FW?

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]aerobot
2007-02-27 12:02 pm UTC (link)
*reads* Iiiiinteresting.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]sailorjpg
2007-02-26 07:36 pm UTC (link)
I thought it was a tiny little Dildo, honestly.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]heddychaa
2007-02-26 07:38 pm UTC (link)
Haha! We actually have one of those at work. A tiny little 1.5" dildo. And not as a gag, either! o.O;

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]perletwo, 2007-02-27 12:53 am UTC

[info]shinga
2007-02-26 03:47 pm UTC (link)
*sings* "Do your bits hang low, do they wobble to and fro..."

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]smo
2007-02-26 06:32 pm UTC (link)
"Can you tie 'em in a knot, can you tie 'em in a bow?"

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]april_hurst
2007-02-27 01:06 am UTC (link)
Can you throw them over your shoulder like a Continental soldier?

(Pictures like this probably do exist somewhere...)

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]rosehiptea
2007-02-26 07:39 pm UTC (link)
Sadly, I have always wondered if the original version of that song did not in fact involve ears.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]ayezur
2007-02-26 09:34 pm UTC (link)
I think it involved testicles, actually...

"Do your balls hang low, do they wobble to and fro, can you tie 'em in a knot, can you tie 'em in a bow..."

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]stopthatgirl7
2007-02-27 10:21 am UTC (link)
I heard "boobs" long before I heard "ears."

(Reply to this)(Parent)


(Read comments) -

 
   
Privacy Policy - COPPA
Legal Disclaimer - Site Map