Log In

Home
    - Create Journal
    - Update
    - Download

LiveJournal
    - News
    - Paid Accounts
    - Contributors

Customize
    - Customize Journal
    - Create Style
    - Edit Style

Find Users
    - Random!
    - By Region
    - By Interest
    - Search

Edit ...
    - Personal Info &
      Settings
    - Your Friends
    - Old Entries
    - Your Pictures
    - Your Password

Developer Area

Need Help?
    - Lost Password?
    - Freq. Asked
      Questions
    - Support Area



rosehiptea ([info]rosehiptea) wrote in [info]otf_wank,
@ 2007-02-25 23:56:00


Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
Current mood:Obscene
Current music:Danko Jones: Heartbreak's A Blessing

Wank! Over Naked Women!
Finding wank on deviantArt isn't so hard, I guess, but this seems to have become worse than most.

A nude photo of a woman, NOT worksafe, makes the Daily Deviations.

The first comment is a remark about the girly bits, so the wankiness starts right away. Then people start debating how good a picture it is in the first place. I'm not sure one can link individual comments on dA but the wank seems to be everywhere, at least on the first page.



chaoswolf1982: Nice dangle down there.

ChloeKytten:

that's just a rude remark!!!

Her eyes do the talking in this piece, what is she thinking of I wonder????


Then we have a long argument between Ken21 and pangwinking that I had to pick bits out of:

Ken21:

wow what? No ones talking about lens focus. Do you even know what you’re talking about? Harsh lighting, he’s using soft lights for one, and I can see just by looking at the image he has six point lighting set up. It’s ok for a photo to have shadows.

~pangwinking:
Actually no, I have no idea what I'm talking about. I'm glad I have somebody such as yourself to teach me so much about what pays my bills.



And more people give their thoughts on naked women:

LadyHellFyre:
Guess i'll add my piece. Only thing i can say is, nudity in itself is a focal point. So...when it's there, that's what it is. -shrug- Pretty obvious, i think these other people just think we're being harsh. But it's a fact o' life my friends. Dogs sniff eachother's wangs, humans are baffled with nakedness.


SojinnZero:

This piece is ridiculous. The depth of field is huge, and the eyes absolutely cannot be the focal point since they are so dark compared to the highlight on her right thigh and the white of the floor. They are subdued. The pose means nothing, being that of a brooding nature conflicting with her confused look. The clothes she is wearing don't appear to mean anything either or have been taken into consideration.

I say it's just an excuse for a nude photo.


P.S. The woman has a gigantic labia


And I love this line from clericflcl

Oh yeah. Great job everyone, and keep up the good work. Your arguments are always amusing, and the pointlessness in the fights brings new light into my day, because it makes me feel normal.

Lama Power Forever!
Clericflcl


And then it just detiorates, and that's only the front page:

Neeycko:
I think chaoswolf's comment is fine.

This is deviantart for christ's sake. If you upload something here, people are going to say whatever the hell they like.

they can call it whatever they like. You say dangle and NO ONE is confused by what you mean, in this case. I really don't see what the big deal is here.

ThisIsaTragedy:
get a fucking life.

Shelax:
You know what I call this entire string of comments, including my own? Labia Minority Report. AHAAHHAHAAHAHA. Think Spielberg will direct? Holy shit, I'm on a roll!


There's more on the other pages too, but frankly I lost steam at some point...



EDIT: For artistic purposes only!

I unfortunately forgot that one needs an account to see the "mature" content.

[info]scarah2 has kindly provided a screencap of the art. Again, NSFW!

EDIT 2: Now with redeeming social value!

In the comments here, [info]funkyhelix provides backstory about the Black Apple.



(Read comments) - (Post a new comment)


[info]eilan
2007-02-26 10:20 am UTC (link)
I must ask: Is there any way to look at that picture and not look at the labia during the first two seconds? I certainly did. Focus on the eyes my ass...

And PSA: IT'S LABIA, NOT VAGINA!!!

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]elysian
2007-02-26 11:28 am UTC (link)
Every line/angle in the photograph demands you look at her crotch. If we're meant to focus on her eyes the composition is crap.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


iwanttobeasleep
2007-02-26 07:02 pm UTC (link)
The eyes are completely dull, anyway.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]barankhy
2007-02-26 12:13 pm UTC (link)
No, there isn't, unless you have the window closed for those first two seconds. That pic just shouts "lookit what I got there!" - I even daresay that the slightly-larger-than-expected clit/labia/whatev is somewhat integral to it.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


(Read comments) -

 
   
Privacy Policy - COPPA
Legal Disclaimer - Site Map