Log In

Home
    - Create Journal
    - Update
    - Download

LiveJournal
    - News
    - Paid Accounts
    - Contributors

Customize
    - Customize Journal
    - Create Style
    - Edit Style

Find Users
    - Random!
    - By Region
    - By Interest
    - Search

Edit ...
    - Personal Info &
      Settings
    - Your Friends
    - Old Entries
    - Your Pictures
    - Your Password

Developer Area

Need Help?
    - Lost Password?
    - Freq. Asked
      Questions
    - Support Area



rosehiptea ([info]rosehiptea) wrote in [info]otf_wank,
@ 2007-02-25 23:56:00


Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
Current mood:Obscene
Current music:Danko Jones: Heartbreak's A Blessing

Wank! Over Naked Women!
Finding wank on deviantArt isn't so hard, I guess, but this seems to have become worse than most.

A nude photo of a woman, NOT worksafe, makes the Daily Deviations.

The first comment is a remark about the girly bits, so the wankiness starts right away. Then people start debating how good a picture it is in the first place. I'm not sure one can link individual comments on dA but the wank seems to be everywhere, at least on the first page.



chaoswolf1982: Nice dangle down there.

ChloeKytten:

that's just a rude remark!!!

Her eyes do the talking in this piece, what is she thinking of I wonder????


Then we have a long argument between Ken21 and pangwinking that I had to pick bits out of:

Ken21:

wow what? No ones talking about lens focus. Do you even know what you’re talking about? Harsh lighting, he’s using soft lights for one, and I can see just by looking at the image he has six point lighting set up. It’s ok for a photo to have shadows.

~pangwinking:
Actually no, I have no idea what I'm talking about. I'm glad I have somebody such as yourself to teach me so much about what pays my bills.



And more people give their thoughts on naked women:

LadyHellFyre:
Guess i'll add my piece. Only thing i can say is, nudity in itself is a focal point. So...when it's there, that's what it is. -shrug- Pretty obvious, i think these other people just think we're being harsh. But it's a fact o' life my friends. Dogs sniff eachother's wangs, humans are baffled with nakedness.


SojinnZero:

This piece is ridiculous. The depth of field is huge, and the eyes absolutely cannot be the focal point since they are so dark compared to the highlight on her right thigh and the white of the floor. They are subdued. The pose means nothing, being that of a brooding nature conflicting with her confused look. The clothes she is wearing don't appear to mean anything either or have been taken into consideration.

I say it's just an excuse for a nude photo.


P.S. The woman has a gigantic labia


And I love this line from clericflcl

Oh yeah. Great job everyone, and keep up the good work. Your arguments are always amusing, and the pointlessness in the fights brings new light into my day, because it makes me feel normal.

Lama Power Forever!
Clericflcl


And then it just detiorates, and that's only the front page:

Neeycko:
I think chaoswolf's comment is fine.

This is deviantart for christ's sake. If you upload something here, people are going to say whatever the hell they like.

they can call it whatever they like. You say dangle and NO ONE is confused by what you mean, in this case. I really don't see what the big deal is here.

ThisIsaTragedy:
get a fucking life.

Shelax:
You know what I call this entire string of comments, including my own? Labia Minority Report. AHAAHHAHAAHAHA. Think Spielberg will direct? Holy shit, I'm on a roll!


There's more on the other pages too, but frankly I lost steam at some point...



EDIT: For artistic purposes only!

I unfortunately forgot that one needs an account to see the "mature" content.

[info]scarah2 has kindly provided a screencap of the art. Again, NSFW!

EDIT 2: Now with redeeming social value!

In the comments here, [info]funkyhelix provides backstory about the Black Apple.



(Read comments) - (Post a new comment)


[info]lady_red
2007-02-26 11:31 am UTC (link)
Mature Content Filter is On
---
This section of deviantART requires that you have a deviantART account.

Screenshots plz?

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]ironymaiden
2007-02-26 11:37 am UTC (link)
Yeah, I can't see it either, and I just don't care enough to make an account.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]eilan
2007-02-26 11:49 am UTC (link)
I'm so pathetic. I created one for this.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]bolboreta
2007-02-26 02:16 pm UTC (link)
Me too.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]smo
2007-02-26 06:32 pm UTC (link)
Me three.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]barankhy
2007-02-27 12:27 am UTC (link)
Me f(3)=(x+1).
[/random math flashback]

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]rosehiptea
2007-02-26 08:02 pm UTC (link)
A link to a shot of the art has now been edited in. Sorry about that!

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]aerobot
2007-02-26 12:56 pm UTC (link)
To the left of the pic, there is a link called 'download'. Click it. Be amazed! :O

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]scarah2
2007-02-26 02:12 pm UTC (link)
OK I will cap it.

NSFW NSFW NSFW!!!!!!

It is a clitoris, I promise

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]hallidae
2007-02-26 03:22 pm UTC (link)
...So what was the rule about how long it has to be to be considered a dick?

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]scarah2
2007-02-26 03:28 pm UTC (link)
This one has got to be under two inches. A more applicable rule might be: How small does a dick have to be before it's considered a clitoris?

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]dragonfangirl
2007-02-26 11:46 pm UTC (link)
Or for that matter, what size does it have to be before the doctor present at the birth decides "Okay, that's freaky, let's arrange some corrective surgery stat and make this boy a girl."

(Reply to this)(Parent)

The female anatomy has never been more confusing.
[info]zealot
2007-02-26 03:44 pm UTC (link)
If it's her clit, then she has no inner labia or clit hood...?

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

Re: The female anatomy has never been more confusing.
[info]scarah2
2007-02-26 03:52 pm UTC (link)
Sure she does. If I have to zoom way way in on them I will, lol. It seems to me the least present population is her outer labia. But that could just be genetics.

Srs, she's squatting so most of her junk besides that which happens to be quite prominent is pointing at the ground, and thus hidden by the angle.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

Re: The female anatomy has never been more confusing.
[info]heddychaa
2007-02-26 06:58 pm UTC (link)
Dude, seriously, that's not her clitoris. It's her labia. It dangles. It's wrinkly. Sometimes they're like that. If you have a longer one and you pose like that, it hangs out. Clitorises, even if they're long, do not sag out of one's vagina.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

Re: The female anatomy has never been more confusing.
[info]seldomnaughty
2007-02-26 07:10 pm UTC (link)
Clitorises, even if they're long, do not sag out of one's vagina.

I would hope not, seeing as they're not generally in the vagina...

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

Re: The female anatomy has never been more confusing.
[info]heddychaa
2007-02-26 07:12 pm UTC (link)
That would be pretty sweet if they were though. Less troubles over explaining to dumb guys that no, sticking it in is not going to get me off on its own.

By vagina I meant outerlabia, you know, exposed genitalia. Of course, I had to type the wrong thing. . . just to check if you were. . . paying attention. . .

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]rosehiptea
2007-02-26 07:45 pm UTC (link)
Thank you! I can't believe I forgot about needing an account. I hope you don't mind if I link that up there.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]lady_red
2007-02-28 01:34 am UTC (link)
Wow... it IS rather dangley...

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]rosehiptea
2007-02-26 08:03 pm UTC (link)
Sorry, I can't believe I forgot about that. Screenshot of the art now linked.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


(Read comments) -

 
   
Privacy Policy - COPPA
Legal Disclaimer - Site Map