Log In

Home
    - Create Journal
    - Update
    - Download

LiveJournal
    - News
    - Paid Accounts
    - Contributors

Customize
    - Customize Journal
    - Create Style
    - Edit Style

Find Users
    - Random!
    - By Region
    - By Interest
    - Search

Edit ...
    - Personal Info &
      Settings
    - Your Friends
    - Old Entries
    - Your Pictures
    - Your Password

Developer Area

Need Help?
    - Lost Password?
    - Freq. Asked
      Questions
    - Support Area



rosehiptea ([info]rosehiptea) wrote in [info]otf_wank,
@ 2007-02-25 23:56:00


Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
Current mood:Obscene
Current music:Danko Jones: Heartbreak's A Blessing

Wank! Over Naked Women!
Finding wank on deviantArt isn't so hard, I guess, but this seems to have become worse than most.

A nude photo of a woman, NOT worksafe, makes the Daily Deviations.

The first comment is a remark about the girly bits, so the wankiness starts right away. Then people start debating how good a picture it is in the first place. I'm not sure one can link individual comments on dA but the wank seems to be everywhere, at least on the first page.



chaoswolf1982: Nice dangle down there.

ChloeKytten:

that's just a rude remark!!!

Her eyes do the talking in this piece, what is she thinking of I wonder????


Then we have a long argument between Ken21 and pangwinking that I had to pick bits out of:

Ken21:

wow what? No ones talking about lens focus. Do you even know what you’re talking about? Harsh lighting, he’s using soft lights for one, and I can see just by looking at the image he has six point lighting set up. It’s ok for a photo to have shadows.

~pangwinking:
Actually no, I have no idea what I'm talking about. I'm glad I have somebody such as yourself to teach me so much about what pays my bills.



And more people give their thoughts on naked women:

LadyHellFyre:
Guess i'll add my piece. Only thing i can say is, nudity in itself is a focal point. So...when it's there, that's what it is. -shrug- Pretty obvious, i think these other people just think we're being harsh. But it's a fact o' life my friends. Dogs sniff eachother's wangs, humans are baffled with nakedness.


SojinnZero:

This piece is ridiculous. The depth of field is huge, and the eyes absolutely cannot be the focal point since they are so dark compared to the highlight on her right thigh and the white of the floor. They are subdued. The pose means nothing, being that of a brooding nature conflicting with her confused look. The clothes she is wearing don't appear to mean anything either or have been taken into consideration.

I say it's just an excuse for a nude photo.


P.S. The woman has a gigantic labia


And I love this line from clericflcl

Oh yeah. Great job everyone, and keep up the good work. Your arguments are always amusing, and the pointlessness in the fights brings new light into my day, because it makes me feel normal.

Lama Power Forever!
Clericflcl


And then it just detiorates, and that's only the front page:

Neeycko:
I think chaoswolf's comment is fine.

This is deviantart for christ's sake. If you upload something here, people are going to say whatever the hell they like.

they can call it whatever they like. You say dangle and NO ONE is confused by what you mean, in this case. I really don't see what the big deal is here.

ThisIsaTragedy:
get a fucking life.

Shelax:
You know what I call this entire string of comments, including my own? Labia Minority Report. AHAAHHAHAAHAHA. Think Spielberg will direct? Holy shit, I'm on a roll!


There's more on the other pages too, but frankly I lost steam at some point...



EDIT: For artistic purposes only!

I unfortunately forgot that one needs an account to see the "mature" content.

[info]scarah2 has kindly provided a screencap of the art. Again, NSFW!

EDIT 2: Now with redeeming social value!

In the comments here, [info]funkyhelix provides backstory about the Black Apple.



(Read comments) - (Post a new comment)


[info]shinga
2007-02-26 03:06 pm UTC (link)
OH WOW, A NUDE IS A DD. GOSH, WHATEVER WILL WE DO.

Jesus, when isn't a generic borderline-porn photo a DD?

Did ScottB feature it? I swear, that's all he does all day. Look up nekkid photos and DD them. And never the good ones, either, because DA has plenty of amazing nudes! Nono, he goes after the saaame generic "hee, boobies! hee GIGANTIC EXPOSED LABIA OF DOOM! ass shot!"

The thing is about a lot of nude DDs... there's hardly any artistic merit to them at all. It's just naked women trying to convey sexuality. Gee, where have I seen that before? Right, right, teh pronz.

I could go through the Artistic Nude section of DA and find something ten times better than this within ten seconds. Hell, I'll do it!

What about this one? Yes, very focused on Teh Boobz, but excellent color, lighting and focus. Or this, rather dark and clever and fun. Even this!

But nooo. We get the "Look at my labia; ask me how!"

*checks link again*

Yup, ScottB! I don't know WHY I bothered to ask *L*

(Reply to this)(Thread)


iwanttobeasleep
2007-02-26 03:48 pm UTC (link)
I approve highly of your selections.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]soupspooks
2007-02-26 05:15 pm UTC (link)
I also agree with your comment, and would like to add that for a site that calls itself 'deviant', DA has some unpleasently conservative, hypocritical, predjudiced, and doublestandard sides to it. And that's just in how they manage their site.

-crabapplered

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]rosehiptea
2007-02-26 07:35 pm UTC (link)
Those are nice, especially that first one. They're certainly more artistic; I have to agree.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]sailorjpg
2007-02-26 07:49 pm UTC (link)
What about this one? Yes, very focused on Teh Boobz, but excellent color, lighting and focus.
My eyes were constantly focusing on her face, actually. Her face was very unique, angular and striking, the boobs were just boobs. Beautiful peice!

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]chibikaijuu
2007-02-27 04:51 am UTC (link)
She looked like ice. I thought it was lovely, if sort of perfume advert-ish.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]visp
2007-02-27 01:48 pm UTC (link)
Yup. You know a girl is really beautiful when she's topless, with breasts like that, and still you can't keep your eyes off her face.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]edgyspice
2007-02-26 08:11 pm UTC (link)
I already snarked on this same topic somewhere up the page, but...yeah, pretty much.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]ereshkigal
2007-02-26 09:01 pm UTC (link)
I was always rather fond of this guy's stuff. This one caught my eye first, but he's got a lot of great stuff in there.

My only complaint really is that they all seem to be shaved.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]rosehiptea
2007-02-26 10:22 pm UTC (link)
Nice! *puts him on watch*

But I'm glad I'm not the only one wishing for more models who don't shave.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]chibikaijuu
2007-02-27 04:54 am UTC (link)
...ooh. The interplay of the lighting/color of the backdrop and the model is amazing.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]littlest_lurker
2007-02-27 12:10 am UTC (link)
Ooh, the second one is pretty. I like the way the light hits the hair.

The photo in the wank? Not so good.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]wrongly_amused
2007-02-27 01:32 am UTC (link)
BUT THE FEMALE BODY IS AN ARTFORM. REALLY.

Two pretties I've come across:

Nude with roses

Red silk scarf

(Reply to this)(Parent)


(Read comments) -

 
   
Privacy Policy - COPPA
Legal Disclaimer - Site Map