Current mood:	Obscene
Current music:	Danko Jones: Heartbreak's A Blessing

Wank! Over Naked Women!
Finding wank on deviantArt isn't so hard, I guess, but this seems to have become worse than most.

A nude photo of a woman, NOT worksafe, makes the Daily Deviations.

The first comment is a remark about the girly bits, so the wankiness starts right away. Then people start debating how good a picture it is in the first place. I'm not sure one can link individual comments on dA but the wank seems to be everywhere, at least on the first page.

chaoswolf1982: Nice dangle down there.

ChloeKytten:

that's just a rude remark!!!

Her eyes do the talking in this piece, what is she thinking of I wonder????

Then we have a long argument between Ken21 and pangwinking that I had to pick bits out of:

Ken21:

wow what? No ones talking about lens focus. Do you even know what you’re talking about? Harsh lighting, he’s using soft lights for one, and I can see just by looking at the image he has six point lighting set up. It’s ok for a photo to have shadows.

~pangwinking:
Actually no, I have no idea what I'm talking about. I'm glad I have somebody such as yourself to teach me so much about what pays my bills.

And more people give their thoughts on naked women:

LadyHellFyre:
Guess i'll add my piece. Only thing i can say is, nudity in itself is a focal point. So...when it's there, that's what it is. -shrug- Pretty obvious, i think these other people just think we're being harsh. But it's a fact o' life my friends. Dogs sniff eachother's wangs, humans are baffled with nakedness.

SojinnZero:

This piece is ridiculous. The depth of field is huge, and the eyes absolutely cannot be the focal point since they are so dark compared to the highlight on her right thigh and the white of the floor. They are subdued. The pose means nothing, being that of a brooding nature conflicting with her confused look. The clothes she is wearing don't appear to mean anything either or have been taken into consideration.

I say it's just an excuse for a nude photo.

P.S. The woman has a gigantic labia

And I love this line from clericflcl

Oh yeah. Great job everyone, and keep up the good work. Your arguments are always amusing, and the pointlessness in the fights brings new light into my day, because it makes me feel normal.

Lama Power Forever!
Clericflcl

And then it just detiorates, and that's only the front page:

Neeycko:
I think chaoswolf's comment is fine.

This is deviantart for christ's sake. If you upload something here, people are going to say whatever the hell they like.

they can call it whatever they like. You say dangle and NO ONE is confused by what you mean, in this case. I really don't see what the big deal is here.

ThisIsaTragedy:
get a fucking life.

Shelax:
You know what I call this entire string of comments, including my own? Labia Minority Report. AHAAHHAHAAHAHA. Think Spielberg will direct? Holy shit, I'm on a roll!

There's more on the other pages too, but frankly I lost steam at some point...

EDIT: For artistic purposes only!

I unfortunately forgot that one needs an account to see the "mature" content.

scarah2 has kindly provided a screencap of the art. Again, NSFW!

EDIT 2: Now with redeeming social value!

In the comments here, funkyhelix provides backstory about the Black Apple.

(Read comments) - (Post a new comment)

	altoidsaddict 2007-02-27 07:31 am UTC (link)
	Wow, the Hive Vagina is the last place I'd expect for people to be concurring with the idea that a woman's labia - which in this case have no significant deviation from the wide spectrum that is the norm, despite what Playboy tells you - are freakish or wrong or should cause us to question her very gender. (Reply to this)(Thread)

loonylupinlover
2007-02-27 09:12 am UTC (link)

I can't speak for anyone else, but I just can't figure out how that looks like labia. Because 1) "labia" is plural, and also b) every picture of labia I've seen looks like fleshy flaps no matter what size they are, and finally 4) I just can't reconcile twin flaps, no matter how large or dangly they are, with one thinnish cylinder that looks more like an overgrown nipple or clit to me. Perhaps if the angle was different it would be clearer.

Or am I simply interrogating this photograph from the wrong perspective?

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

	loonylupinlover 2007-02-27 09:15 am UTC (link)
	...I ~~stand~~ squat corrected? Guess I'd just never seen a shot of them that wasn't more like . (SO NOT WORK SAFE, GUYS.) (Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

	isntitironic 2007-02-27 03:37 pm UTC (link)
	... I look at that first one and all I can think is, "hee hee, nice tan lines". (Reply to this)(Parent)

	altoidsaddict 2007-02-27 06:38 pm UTC (link)
	For a fetish site, that's pretty cool. Especially the letters section. (Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

	loonylupinlover 2007-02-27 06:39 pm UTC (link)
	I think I just did a search for "large labia" and that popped up. Very educational. I did have to look for a while before I found a picture that resembled the original devArt thing, though. (Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

	perletwo 2007-02-28 04:34 am UTC (link)
	Damn, you really took one for the team. Thankee! (Reply to this)(Parent)

altoidsaddict
2007-02-27 06:20 pm UTC (link)

Or the labia are not spread, since in order to achieve spread protruding labia, one usually has to manually spread them. Or she has one side of the protruding labia and one that does not protrude, which is very common. Seriously, protruding labia tend to look exactly like that, particularly since she's squatting which would cause them to stick out more, and there's nothing wrong or weird about them. Clits don't tend to be wrinkly, and you can see this protrusion is.

At least, I'd lived thirty years believing as such. It's quite a shock, and if I'd gotten any complains from any of my menfolk over the years, I might be inclined to hate my womenparts like a lot of women do because of stuff like this.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

	loonylupinlover 2007-02-27 06:24 pm UTC (link)
	I've definitely heard of one labia being longer than the other, I just didn't expect even just one to look more like a cylinder than a flap. But I guess the angle makes it look like that. As to manually spreading them, that is something I have absolutely no experience on. I didn't say there was anything wrong or weird about them. Just not what I'd seen before. (Reply to this)(Parent)

	mastervex 2007-02-27 09:29 am UTC (link)
	You weren't actually expecting intelligence, mockery of the people doing the wanking all over DA, or the presence of the funny, now were you? Such cute naivete! (Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

	altoidsaddict 2007-02-27 06:22 pm UTC (link)
	I know, silly of me! Although I agree with the "nice dangle" comments. Because it is a nice dangle. (Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

	heddychaa 2007-02-27 07:45 pm UTC (link)
	Thank you for treating long labia like they are anything but freakish abnormalities/possible penises. >.> (Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

	miharu 2007-02-28 01:12 am UTC (link)
	I say blame the angle and the photographer, not the labia. Most of these people (DA, mind you) wouldn't know what real genitalia looked like if it fell out of the sky and mushroom stamped them. I blame Houston and her many, many gangbangs. (Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

	heddychaa 2007-02-28 04:42 am UTC (link)
	it's the squat, really, although it is the photographer's fault for staging the photo in a way that basically makes them the central focus. (Reply to this)(Parent)

(Read comments) -