Log In

Home
    - Create Journal
    - Update
    - Download

LiveJournal
    - News
    - Paid Accounts
    - Contributors

Customize
    - Customize Journal
    - Create Style
    - Edit Style

Find Users
    - Random!
    - By Region
    - By Interest
    - Search

Edit ...
    - Personal Info &
      Settings
    - Your Friends
    - Old Entries
    - Your Pictures
    - Your Password

Developer Area

Need Help?
    - Lost Password?
    - Freq. Asked
      Questions
    - Support Area



Jon "Bad Wasabi" Wood ([info]mcity) wrote in [info]otf_wank,
@ 2007-03-26 17:53:00


Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
Please, no bestialist bashing.
Over in stupid_free, there is a post about bestiality stupid.

[info]lyrajane: I agree with the people who have said the OP probably likes bestiality porn and is trying to find a way to justify it.

Obvious points: First, a dog/horse/sheep doesn't have the intellectual ability to say yes or no, so bestiality is absolutely wrong. Second, porn is filmed and edited. They don't show the 50 times they set up the scene and the dog whimpered or ran away or lost interest, or how they trained the dog to mount the woman in the first place, or how many dogs they went through to find one that could be trained in that way. It's no more "real" than any other porn scenario.

Sheesh, even little kids know movies are not real. They don't magically BECOME real when there's fucking involved.


[info]pawsie: eh... according to that logic.. wouldn't that make pet owners also wrong? You paper train a dog, to defend your home, or to sit... it's not as if they wanted to be taught those things. So is it just the fact they're unable to say yes or no? Rape is normally taken with sexual interaction... but it traditionally means to seize, take, or carry off by force. Domesticating an animal can easily be seen as rape.

But this is just coming from a guy that doesn't see it as black and white....

However, I'm not justifying it...I'm just saying it's not that simple.


And they're off!

Please, no furbashing.


(Post a new comment)


[info]caito
2007-03-26 10:04 pm UTC (link)
Can we still bash ponyfuckers, and their ilk?

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]suzycat
2007-04-02 10:57 am UTC (link)
"Shut your fucking face, pony fucker! You're the one that fucked your pony, pony fucker! You roll your dick in oats, it's true, but it's OK cos Pony's married to you! HAHAHAHA!"

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]solar_type_star
2007-03-26 10:05 pm UTC (link)
Aaaaand pawsie wins the Fastest Missing of the Point Award for his 0.5s record!

(Reply to this)


[info]brown_betty
2007-03-26 10:07 pm UTC (link)
When will the hurting stop, mommy?

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]vzg
2007-03-26 11:36 pm UTC (link)
Not until you finish teaching the dog to lick daddy's balls, baby.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]jira, 2007-03-27 12:50 am UTC

[info]sepiamagpie
2007-03-26 10:11 pm UTC (link)
I hate you.

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]ryuutchi
2007-03-26 11:09 pm UTC (link)
Would you like a brownie, Sep?

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]sepiamagpie, 2007-03-26 11:15 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]scootermcgaffin, 2007-03-26 11:24 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]sepiamagpie, 2007-03-26 11:27 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]harrylovesron, 2007-03-26 11:30 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]sepiamagpie, 2007-03-26 11:32 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]harrylovesron, 2007-03-26 11:36 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]chaimonkey, 2007-03-27 12:47 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]harrylovesron, 2007-03-27 04:25 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]chaimonkey, 2007-04-02 12:51 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]fuzzybluelogic, 2007-03-27 12:55 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]harrylovesron, 2007-03-27 04:27 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]amxjm, 2007-03-27 07:05 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]harrylovesron, 2007-03-27 05:44 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]wankaholic, 2007-03-27 12:29 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]chaimonkey, 2007-03-27 12:47 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]harrylovesron, 2007-03-27 04:20 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]napalmnacey, 2007-03-27 09:27 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]harrylovesron, 2007-03-27 05:50 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]napalmnacey, 2007-03-28 04:22 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]harrylovesron, 2007-03-28 01:27 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]napalmnacey, 2007-03-28 02:20 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]chaimonkey, 2007-04-02 12:59 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]napalmnacey, 2007-04-02 02:41 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]chaimonkey, 2007-04-02 03:00 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]napalmnacey, 2007-04-02 03:08 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]chaimonkey, 2007-04-02 03:11 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]chaimonkey, 2007-04-02 12:57 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]napalmnacey, 2007-04-02 06:14 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]crevette, 2007-03-27 02:32 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]harrylovesron, 2007-03-27 04:22 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]fuzzybluelogic, 2007-03-27 04:33 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]harrylovesron, 2007-03-27 04:36 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]fuzzybluelogic, 2007-03-27 04:38 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]harrylovesron, 2007-03-27 06:04 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]harrylovesron, 2007-03-27 04:34 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]ryuutchi, 2007-03-26 11:37 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]sepiamagpie, 2007-03-26 11:39 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]fevered_ego, 2007-03-26 11:26 pm UTC

[info]demonbean
2007-03-26 10:16 pm UTC (link)
"So if you were having sex with a deaf or blind person, and you couldn't communicate with the person, but you wanted sex, and the deaf/blind person went through with it. Would that be morally wrong because they didn't properly consent to it?"

Deaf/blind people=/=dogs! Sentience is key! "Traditional consent is hegemonic and restrictive" does not change the fact that animals are not sentient! *twitches*

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]t_boy
2007-03-27 12:51 am UTC (link)

Wait. If you can’t communicate with them, you can’t fuck them! That’s rape, dumbass!

Talk first, then fuck! One step at a time, stupid! One fucking step at a fucking time!

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]demonbean, 2007-03-27 02:51 am UTC

[info]lcsbanana
2007-03-27 02:21 am UTC (link)
I think Helen Keller needs to rise from the dead and smack this person until they cry. Y/N?

....god, I wish I had my communist-space-bug icon on journalfen.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]stopthatgirl7, 2007-03-27 02:28 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]makeshyft, 2007-03-27 12:36 pm UTC

[info]dragonfangirl
2007-03-26 10:18 pm UTC (link)
Sheesh, even little kids know movies are not real. They don't magically BECOME real when there's fucking involved.

WHAT IS THIS STRANGE EARTH LOGIC?!

(Reply to this)(Thread)


pastri_archy
2007-03-27 02:53 am UTC (link)
So...if we reverse that...all the HP porn means the Wizarding World actually exists? Right? *big eyes*

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]scarah2, 2007-03-27 06:53 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]scootermcgaffin, 2007-03-27 02:39 pm UTC

[info]soupspooks
2007-03-26 10:48 pm UTC (link)
/sigh

(Reply to this)


[info]oxydosic
2007-03-26 11:19 pm UTC (link)
...why is this here? This is not lulz.

*hides behind [info]sepiamagpie*

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]demonbean
2007-03-27 04:17 am UTC (link)
This is not the otf_wank we ordered!

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]annaham, 2007-03-27 10:14 pm UTC

iwanttobeasleep
2007-03-26 11:24 pm UTC (link)
I was wondering when one of TQC's bestiality questions would show up here.

(Reply to this)


[info]squib
2007-03-26 11:28 pm UTC (link)
I thought there was a moratorium on unfunny animalfucking wank.

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]sorchar
2007-03-27 06:40 am UTC (link)
I want a moratorium on all animalfucking wank. None of it's going to be funny for a good long time, regardless.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]lizrocks
2007-03-26 11:51 pm UTC (link)
In fact, next time your dog humps your leg, be sure to suck it off, because it means it wants sex! From you!

Win.

(Reply to this)


[info]puipui
2007-03-27 12:08 am UTC (link)
Domesticating an animal can easily be seen as rape.

Is that related to the milk = rape thing, then?

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]april_hurst, 2007-03-27 12:24 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]t_boy, 2007-03-27 12:48 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]jat_sapphire, 2007-03-27 06:52 pm UTC

[info]ladysorka
2007-03-27 12:42 am UTC (link)
...yeah, I totally read that as "a post about bestiality squid" and thought for a moment there'd be wank about Giant Squid fic.

Now I'm sad. Wank about giant squid fic would be fun.

(Reply to this)


[info]chaimonkey
2007-03-27 12:49 am UTC (link)
These people are made of so much fail.

(Reply to this)


[info]luthe
2007-03-27 01:08 am UTC (link)
Are you sure I'm not allowed to get out the furbashing hammer? I promise to only use it on the furfucking furries.

(Reply to this)


[info]tehrin
2007-03-27 02:28 am UTC (link)
LALALA Bestiality wank, I'm not reading you!

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]leto, 2007-03-27 06:54 pm UTC

[info]spawn_of_kong
2007-03-27 04:06 am UTC (link)
I agree with above comments here: no more bestiality wanks, UNLESS it's so wrong, it's funny (such as, say, horsefucker guy; now THAT was funny).

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]sepiamagpie, 2007-03-27 05:34 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]squib, 2007-03-27 06:47 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]sepiamagpie, 2007-03-27 06:49 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]squib, 2007-03-27 06:59 am UTC

 
   
Privacy Policy - COPPA
Legal Disclaimer - Site Map