Log In

Home
    - Create Journal
    - Update
    - Download

LiveJournal
    - News
    - Paid Accounts
    - Contributors

Customize
    - Customize Journal
    - Create Style
    - Edit Style

Find Users
    - Random!
    - By Region
    - By Interest
    - Search

Edit ...
    - Personal Info &
      Settings
    - Your Friends
    - Old Entries
    - Your Pictures
    - Your Password

Developer Area

Need Help?
    - Lost Password?
    - Freq. Asked
      Questions
    - Support Area



Moira Katson ([info]demonbean) wrote in [info]otf_wank,
"So if you were having sex with a deaf or blind person, and you couldn't communicate with the person, but you wanted sex, and the deaf/blind person went through with it. Would that be morally wrong because they didn't properly consent to it?"

Deaf/blind people=/=dogs! Sentience is key! "Traditional consent is hegemonic and restrictive" does not change the fact that animals are not sentient! *twitches*


(Read comments)

Post a comment in response:

From:
( )Anonymous- this user has disabled anonymous posting.
Username:
Password:
Don't have an account? Create one now.
Subject:
No HTML allowed in subject
  
Message:
 
Notice! This user has turned on the option that logs your IP address when posting.
 
   
Privacy Policy - COPPA
Legal Disclaimer - Site Map