Log In

Home
    - Create Journal
    - Update
    - Download

LiveJournal
    - News
    - Paid Accounts
    - Contributors

Customize
    - Customize Journal
    - Create Style
    - Edit Style

Find Users
    - Random!
    - By Region
    - By Interest
    - Search

Edit ...
    - Personal Info &
      Settings
    - Your Friends
    - Old Entries
    - Your Pictures
    - Your Password

Developer Area

Need Help?
    - Lost Password?
    - Freq. Asked
      Questions
    - Support Area



cookies taste better with funneh ([info]cookie_love) wrote in [info]otf_wank,
@ 2007-04-12 00:37:00


Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
Rosie and the Boycott Conspiracy Therapy
Over at the AOL Video Blog, the wank keeps rolling in as Rosie O'Donnell continues to prove that The View is now just "The Rosie O'Donnell Show"...Part Deux.

The entry spotlights the site http://www.stoprosie.com/ and their crusade to boycott not just The View, but contact the companies whose products are advertised during the commercial breaks.

The real spotlight is on the blog comment board, as pro/anti Rosie visitors bring the funny and the stupid:


Rosie is ridiculous and so are her views and conspiracy therapy. Why would anyone waste their valuable time on such ridiculous television viewing as the view and Rosie?

I just checked out the stop Rosie site. Check out what they want money for. It is a big scam. I would buy myself a laptop before someone else. They need to get over themselfs and get a job

(I will not make a CC joke...I will not make a CC joke....I will not...)

I do not watch the View and especially since Rosie makes such hateful comments starting with Clay/Kelly episode and it's been non stop. The final straw when she criticizes our government for starting 9/11.


As for the petition site, they warned that they will be removing "fake names", which made me curious. I've just started looking over the list and I've already picked out Jack Meyoff, Michael Myers, and Right Wingnuts. Now all I need is to find Ivanna Humpalot and I'll be set.



(Read comments) - (Post a new comment)


[info]harrylovesron
2007-04-12 01:25 pm UTC (link)
I think it's part of the theory that 9/11 was a government conspiracy (that it was rockets hitting the buildings etc.)- supposedly, the planes' fuel couldn't have gotten hot enough to melt a steel building. There's a whole page about it here: http://www.snopes.com/rumors/pentagon.htm

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]kadath
2007-04-12 01:27 pm UTC (link)
Oh holy mother of god. That crap still?

My fiancé, the metallurgist, has a rant about that. It's funny 'cause he shouts and waves his arms around.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]harrylovesron
2007-04-12 01:54 pm UTC (link)
Bwahaha.

I have to wonder, if it was supposed to be rockets hitting the buildings, how did THEY melt steel if planes couldn't?

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]kadath
2007-04-12 02:02 pm UTC (link)
...A wizard did it.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]harrylovesron
2007-04-12 02:38 pm UTC (link)
It was FIREBENDING!

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]silrana
2007-04-12 02:03 pm UTC (link)
I'm with you. If fire never melting steel before was actually true, why would the government go through the time and expense to create unique new rockets for 9/11 when there were already so many other ways to bring buildings down available?

And the conspiracy theory misses the whole point that the steel didn't need to melt to bring down the towers. The steel just needed to soften enough to make the buildings structurally unsound and trigger the collapse failsafes. I'm not an engineer and even I know that.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]kadath
2007-04-12 02:14 pm UTC (link)
The yield strength curve as a function of temperature for structural steel decays fast. It loses something like 90% of its strength hundreds of degrees before it actually melts.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

But why is there WIND on the MOON?
[info]fevered_ego
2007-04-12 02:28 pm UTC (link)
I believe in magic, and I'm wearing my special tinfoil hat. I even made certain to plug my ears and go "LA LA LA."

Clearly, my argument has rendered your flimsy so-called 'science' floppy and useless.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

Re: But why is there WIND on the MOON?
[info]kadath
2007-04-12 02:50 pm UTC (link)
Lo, Science and I am defeated by your mighty rhetorical skillz. Woe!

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]lady7jane
2007-04-12 07:50 pm UTC (link)
Dudes, this won't do at all. The lot of you need hours more in conspiracy therapy if we are to have any chance of cracking this thing. Repeat after me: I want to believe!

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]harrylovesron
2007-04-12 02:41 pm UTC (link)
Heck, anybody should be able to figure out that ramming a large object into a building and making it explode in a GIGANTIC FUCKING FIREBALL can bring it down.

And nevermind the fact that fire is used to forge and shape steel. AUGH.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]plazmah
2007-04-13 07:50 pm UTC (link)
I find your icon hilariously appropriate. ;)

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]harrylovesron
2007-04-13 08:14 pm UTC (link)
I thought so. :D

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]mistressrenet
2007-04-15 02:37 pm UTC (link)
That sounds fun. You should tape him and put him up on YouTube.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]sisterelwood
2007-04-12 02:50 pm UTC (link)
Oh, Snopes, how I love thee.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]harrylovesron
2007-04-12 03:05 pm UTC (link)
Snopes is your friiiiiiend.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]njyoder
2007-04-15 02:49 pm UTC (link)
It couldn't have. Did you bother to look up the melting point of steel?

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

Here. Have a fortune cookie.
[info]tehrin
2007-04-15 04:53 pm UTC (link)
You should read the rest of the comment thread before commenting. Because than you may have picked up on the fact that hlr wasn't "fer srs."

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

Re: Here. Have a fortune cookie.
[info]njyoder
2007-04-15 04:57 pm UTC (link)
Perhaps you should have read it yourself, because there's absolutely nothing indicating that they weren't being serious about jet fuel melting the steel.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

Re: Here. Have a fortune cookie.
[info]tehrin
2007-04-15 05:46 pm UTC (link)
O rly? Firebending must be totally fuckin srs then.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

Re: Here. Have a fortune cookie.
[info]njyoder
2007-04-15 05:57 pm UTC (link)
You do realize that the joke in that thread is that conspiracy theorists believe it was something _other than_ jet fuel melting the steel, hence the "fire bending" joke. When you a) learn to read and b) find comments indicating that they weren't serious about them thinking that jet fuel was melting the steel, respond to me.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

Re: Here. Have a fortune cookie.
[info]tehrin
2007-04-15 05:58 pm UTC (link)
THE POINT
YOUR HED

Done with you now!

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

Re: Here. Have a fortune cookie.
[info]njyoder
2007-04-15 06:09 pm UTC (link)
Exactly as I predicted, when your arrogant point is proven to be ridiculous, you use humor as a defense mechanism and bad humor at that. What's funny is that it even the straightforward jokes in these threads went way, way over your head.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

Re: Here. Have a fortune cookie.
[info]cookie_love
2007-04-16 12:58 am UTC (link)
Here's a joke for you:

KNOCK! KNOCK!
Who's there?
The Point!
The Point who?
Exactly...


(Wow, the month isn't out and the anonymous post option is gone already. Damn.)

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

Re: Here. Have a fortune cookie.
[info]njyoder
2007-04-16 04:45 am UTC (link)
I shouldn't be surprised that someone who thinks that "the point who" makes for a good punchline also has shitty reading comprehension.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

Re: Here. Have a fortune cookie. - [info]cookie_love, 2007-04-16 06:02 am UTC
Re: Here. Have a fortune cookie. - [info]njyoder, 2007-04-16 06:05 am UTC
Re: Here. Have a fortune cookie. - [info]cookie_love, 2007-04-16 07:27 am UTC
Re: Here. Have a fortune cookie. - [info]njyoder, 2007-04-16 08:48 pm UTC
Re: Here. Have a fortune cookie. - [info]cookie_love, 2007-04-16 09:18 pm UTC

(Read comments) -

 
   
Privacy Policy - COPPA
Legal Disclaimer - Site Map