Log In

Home
    - Create Journal
    - Update
    - Download

LiveJournal
    - News
    - Paid Accounts
    - Contributors

Customize
    - Customize Journal
    - Create Style
    - Edit Style

Find Users
    - Random!
    - By Region
    - By Interest
    - Search

Edit ...
    - Personal Info &
      Settings
    - Your Friends
    - Old Entries
    - Your Pictures
    - Your Password

Developer Area

Need Help?
    - Lost Password?
    - Freq. Asked
      Questions
    - Support Area



cookies taste better with funneh ([info]cookie_love) wrote in [info]otf_wank,
@ 2007-04-12 00:37:00


Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
Rosie and the Boycott Conspiracy Therapy
Over at the AOL Video Blog, the wank keeps rolling in as Rosie O'Donnell continues to prove that The View is now just "The Rosie O'Donnell Show"...Part Deux.

The entry spotlights the site http://www.stoprosie.com/ and their crusade to boycott not just The View, but contact the companies whose products are advertised during the commercial breaks.

The real spotlight is on the blog comment board, as pro/anti Rosie visitors bring the funny and the stupid:


Rosie is ridiculous and so are her views and conspiracy therapy. Why would anyone waste their valuable time on such ridiculous television viewing as the view and Rosie?

I just checked out the stop Rosie site. Check out what they want money for. It is a big scam. I would buy myself a laptop before someone else. They need to get over themselfs and get a job

(I will not make a CC joke...I will not make a CC joke....I will not...)

I do not watch the View and especially since Rosie makes such hateful comments starting with Clay/Kelly episode and it's been non stop. The final straw when she criticizes our government for starting 9/11.


As for the petition site, they warned that they will be removing "fake names", which made me curious. I've just started looking over the list and I've already picked out Jack Meyoff, Michael Myers, and Right Wingnuts. Now all I need is to find Ivanna Humpalot and I'll be set.



(Read comments) - (Post a new comment)

Re: Yes, I'm a child.
[info]thecheese
2007-04-13 09:06 pm UTC (link)
I think that the free speech protection only applies to government reprisal, not backlash from the marketplace. This works for me because I hate Imus, who should have been canned years ago when he referred to Gwen Ifill as the "cleaning lady". What an asshole!

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

Re: Yes, I'm a child.
[info]harrylovesron
2007-04-13 10:47 pm UTC (link)
OK, my sympathy for him just went down a lot. :/ I will grant that I didn't listen to his show, but if Imus has consistently been an ass... I still think it's a wee hypocritical for the media to dump on him for making such a comment when one can turn on BET almost any time of the day or night and watch music videos that objectify black women and call them "hos", "bitches" and everything in-between, though.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

Re: Yes, I'm a child.
[info]thecheese
2007-04-14 12:40 am UTC (link)
Yep, the ol' double-standard, it's-ok-if-rappers/blackcomics-say-it-but-nobody-else hypocrisy needs to be taken down next. Still, I'll take what I can get (and I'm an unabashed Gwen Ifill fangirl). Check out what she wrote in the NYT today:
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/04/10/opinion/10ifill.html?_r=1&oref=slogin

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

Re: Yes, I'm a child.
[info]harrylovesron
2007-04-14 01:23 am UTC (link)
Oh, that just rocks.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

Re: Yes, I'm a child.
[info]thecheese
2007-04-14 02:49 am UTC (link)
*sighs*

*fangirls some more...*
Yeah, she always does.

(Reply to this)(Parent)

Re: Yes, I'm a child.
[info]tiasian
2007-04-14 06:35 am UTC (link)
That is awesome.

I like how she describes her reaction as "Oh?... Whatever."

There's just something incredibly satisfying-sounding about hearing about a somebody not getting the memo on what some obnoxious media personality said about them for years and not caring when they finally do.

It just puts them and their probable influence in perspective.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


(Read comments) -

 
   
Privacy Policy - COPPA
Legal Disclaimer - Site Map