Log In

Home
    - Create Journal
    - Update
    - Download

LiveJournal
    - News
    - Paid Accounts
    - Contributors

Customize
    - Customize Journal
    - Create Style
    - Edit Style

Find Users
    - Random!
    - By Region
    - By Interest
    - Search

Edit ...
    - Personal Info &
      Settings
    - Your Friends
    - Old Entries
    - Your Pictures
    - Your Password

Developer Area

Need Help?
    - Lost Password?
    - Freq. Asked
      Questions
    - Support Area



Maria the Lost ([info]mariagoner) wrote in [info]otf_wank,
@ 2007-04-12 19:48:00


Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
Troll in the Dungeon of DV! Troll!
Hysterically stupid troll Njyoder posts on stupid_free about why nobody should ever call if they witness domestic violence (or what they believe might be domestic violence.)

Let me tell you, internets, if there were any a man I'd go to for advice on what to do in a DV situation, it'd be him. Because he apparently knows all about the history of DV and I? I don't. ::snerk::

Oh, and this person isn't exactly a shining beacon of intelligence or compassion either.


(Read comments) - (Post a new comment)

Re: Statistics are evul! Fuck science!
[info]njyoder
2007-04-14 08:28 am UTC (link)
"Well, damn, she's going to back. Shouldn't bother, then, I guess."

This is where that 'reading' thing comes in handy. Numerous times I had to repeat myself stating that I'd get her help because idiots like you couldn't read. I, on the other hand, wouldn't try to piss off the aggressor in the process of getting her help.

Firsthand experience MAKES UP the numbers. Every experience matters, and every experience counts. Of course, at the same time, the overall numbers should have some bearing, but neither completely outweighs the other.

That doesn't make them equivalent. Statistics definitely outweigh first hand experience. If you read the situation that was at hand, you'd note that little was known about the woman, hence you have to make a guess of what's most likely to work and what you want to avoid. You can't do probability without statistics of some kind.

And please, stop this "double standards" bullshit.

I will when you stop demanding I give sources while simultaneously a) not providing any sources yourselves and b) not reading what I say.

Not saying I'm proud of it, but I have better things to do than shuffle through a couple hours worth of comments just to try and fiure out if there was a valid point buried in there anywhere.

All you had to read was my first one. Duurrh.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


(Read comments) -

 
   
Privacy Policy - COPPA
Legal Disclaimer - Site Map