Log In

Home
    - Create Journal
    - Update
    - Download

LiveJournal
    - News
    - Paid Accounts
    - Contributors

Customize
    - Customize Journal
    - Create Style
    - Edit Style

Find Users
    - Random!
    - By Region
    - By Interest
    - Search

Edit ...
    - Personal Info &
      Settings
    - Your Friends
    - Old Entries
    - Your Pictures
    - Your Password

Developer Area

Need Help?
    - Lost Password?
    - Freq. Asked
      Questions
    - Support Area



goblin ([info]goblin) wrote in [info]otf_wank,
@ 2007-05-03 08:47:00


Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
Romance Novelists Fight for Justice!
At the latest Romantic Times convention, author Lauren Baumbach's posters and fliers that promoted her stories were removed by the staff of the Hyatt. When she asked why, she was told they made people uncomfortable. The RT staff did not back her up, although several authors did. Why was her promo material removed when other, far more explicit posters were left up? Her's were for m/m romance.

She blogs about it here (the blog is lurid pink and orange and has a nekkid man chest at the top--not entirely SFW). Most of the comments are supportive, but about halfway down the page Carol Stacey, "Publisher of Romantic Times BOOKreviews magazine," responds. She says that m/m romance isn't reviewed by Romantic Times because it wouldn't reach the "target audience." Posters call her on this--RT held a poll and in fact, the majority of respondants would like m/m romance reviewed in Romantic Times.

This wank is complete with "some of my best friends are gay", "Everyone I interacted with from RT was polite and smiling, but so were those girls in school who stabbed you in the back," f/f romance is hot but m/m romance is disgusting (male poster), and a yaoi writer who understands Lauren B's predicament because she has a "writer soul."


(Read comments) - (Post a new comment)

Re: Links to tangents
[info]octavia
2007-05-03 04:57 pm UTC (link)
I've only just now read the full rant. And I fully admit it: I was tearing up.

I am certainly aware of the function of blogs, but Romance Books are not a Political forum. We are a fantasy business that reflects Everywoman. She doesn't want sadness, discontent, fighting and negativity in her life, for that she watches the news or reads the newspapers. Our writers and editors are sometimes fragile, as the line of our work is pure emotion.

*sniffs*

You don't have to feel confused and resentful about a romance writing career if you are truly of good heart. Occupying your mind with ill thoughts or wallowng in attracting negative people and forming negative perceptions just continues to perpetuate the cycle of feeling unsuccessful.

*hides face in hanky and makes snorting noises*

Someone should stand up and say: I'm not taking this anymore."

Me! Me! Me!

(Seriously. The whole thing is comedy. gold. This woman is the CEO?! And is there a jurisimprudence law she doesn't break?)

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

Re: Links to tangents
[info]willywanka
2007-05-03 05:52 pm UTC (link)
but Romance Books are not a Political forum.

I'm wishing it was, and the truth came out that G W Bush was behind the most catty reviews. Or the most gushing ones.

(Reply to this)(Parent)

Re: Links to tangents
[info]mmanurere
2007-05-03 06:28 pm UTC (link)
(The CEO bit just makes the whole "We're all in it together! As a community! Working towards common goals! And all successful (read: rich) people are good people!" bit even more hilarious in an Orwellian sort of way.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


(Read comments) -

 
   
Privacy Policy - COPPA
Legal Disclaimer - Site Map