Log In

Home
    - Create Journal
    - Update
    - Download

LiveJournal
    - News
    - Paid Accounts
    - Contributors

Customize
    - Customize Journal
    - Create Style
    - Edit Style

Find Users
    - Random!
    - By Region
    - By Interest
    - Search

Edit ...
    - Personal Info &
      Settings
    - Your Friends
    - Old Entries
    - Your Pictures
    - Your Password

Developer Area

Need Help?
    - Lost Password?
    - Freq. Asked
      Questions
    - Support Area



goblin ([info]goblin) wrote in [info]otf_wank,
@ 2007-05-03 08:47:00


Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
Romance Novelists Fight for Justice!
At the latest Romantic Times convention, author Lauren Baumbach's posters and fliers that promoted her stories were removed by the staff of the Hyatt. When she asked why, she was told they made people uncomfortable. The RT staff did not back her up, although several authors did. Why was her promo material removed when other, far more explicit posters were left up? Her's were for m/m romance.

She blogs about it here (the blog is lurid pink and orange and has a nekkid man chest at the top--not entirely SFW). Most of the comments are supportive, but about halfway down the page Carol Stacey, "Publisher of Romantic Times BOOKreviews magazine," responds. She says that m/m romance isn't reviewed by Romantic Times because it wouldn't reach the "target audience." Posters call her on this--RT held a poll and in fact, the majority of respondants would like m/m romance reviewed in Romantic Times.

This wank is complete with "some of my best friends are gay", "Everyone I interacted with from RT was polite and smiling, but so were those girls in school who stabbed you in the back," f/f romance is hot but m/m romance is disgusting (male poster), and a yaoi writer who understands Lauren B's predicament because she has a "writer soul."


(Read comments) - (Post a new comment)


[info]issendai
2007-05-04 01:24 am UTC (link)
Ahh, F_W just warms my heart.

Old Guard Romance Writers: "Women don't want to read about men with men! Ew! Icky!"

Random Offsite Commenter: "Even tasteful romances about gay werewolves?"

The Hive Vagina: "AMAZON PAGE PLZ KTHX will be in bunk now bai."

Yes, Virginia, girls do want to read about boys who like boys. How hard is that to understand?

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]janegraddell
2007-05-04 02:27 am UTC (link)
Yeah. The ickiest thing about this wank is the amount of money I've spent at Amazon because of it.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]issendai
2007-05-05 01:41 pm UTC (link)
Oooh. Then I will pimp again: Tailspin, a f/M romance with a substantial m/m subplot and damn good writing. And not an undulating cock in sight.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]sidewinder
2007-05-04 02:47 am UTC (link)
Shit, even "Passions" today had one of the female characters all "Luis kissing a man?! OH CAN I SEE YES PLEASE THAT'S HOT!"

(Even if it was just Esme. But I like Esme. And while I'm at it, can we have some more hot Chad/Vincent sexing?)

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]evilsqueakers
2007-05-04 03:58 pm UTC (link)
Wait, who the hell is Esme, besides a really stupid name? Teach me to stop watching. They finally get a character worth anything. Besides a shoe in the direction of the television.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]sidewinder
2007-05-07 01:26 pm UTC (link)
Just an occaisional recurring character, unfortunately. Fancy Crane's boozy/sex-craved friend.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]evilsqueakers
2007-05-07 07:56 pm UTC (link)
I remember her now. She wanted to sleep with...Noah, right?

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]sparkysrevenge
2007-05-04 07:01 am UTC (link)
I read that as, "Yes, Vagina."

... I'm thinkin' it's time to go to bed.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]issendai
2007-05-04 05:14 pm UTC (link)
I had to proofread the sentence twice so I wouldn't write that.

There is no sleeping off guttermind. Sorry.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]pet
2007-05-04 04:08 pm UTC (link)
Your comment made me actually laugh out loud. BECAUSE IT IS SO VERY TRUE!

HEEEEEE.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


(Read comments) -

 
   
Privacy Policy - COPPA
Legal Disclaimer - Site Map