Log In

Home
    - Create Journal
    - Update
    - Download

LiveJournal
    - News
    - Paid Accounts
    - Contributors

Customize
    - Customize Journal
    - Create Style
    - Edit Style

Find Users
    - Random!
    - By Region
    - By Interest
    - Search

Edit ...
    - Personal Info &
      Settings
    - Your Friends
    - Old Entries
    - Your Pictures
    - Your Password

Developer Area

Need Help?
    - Lost Password?
    - Freq. Asked
      Questions
    - Support Area



goblin ([info]goblin) wrote in [info]otf_wank,
@ 2007-05-03 08:47:00


Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
Romance Novelists Fight for Justice!
At the latest Romantic Times convention, author Lauren Baumbach's posters and fliers that promoted her stories were removed by the staff of the Hyatt. When she asked why, she was told they made people uncomfortable. The RT staff did not back her up, although several authors did. Why was her promo material removed when other, far more explicit posters were left up? Her's were for m/m romance.

She blogs about it here (the blog is lurid pink and orange and has a nekkid man chest at the top--not entirely SFW). Most of the comments are supportive, but about halfway down the page Carol Stacey, "Publisher of Romantic Times BOOKreviews magazine," responds. She says that m/m romance isn't reviewed by Romantic Times because it wouldn't reach the "target audience." Posters call her on this--RT held a poll and in fact, the majority of respondants would like m/m romance reviewed in Romantic Times.

This wank is complete with "some of my best friends are gay", "Everyone I interacted with from RT was polite and smiling, but so were those girls in school who stabbed you in the back," f/f romance is hot but m/m romance is disgusting (male poster), and a yaoi writer who understands Lauren B's predicament because she has a "writer soul."


(Read comments) - (Post a new comment)


[info]txvoodoo
2007-05-04 02:57 am UTC (link)
by well-connected, did they mean that "the gays" all have a T1 internet connection stuck in their ear or something?

Methinks they overestimate the net savvy of "the gays" - of population in general;)

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]aposiopetic
2007-05-04 03:12 am UTC (link)
I took it to mean that they thought that all the gays were on some tin-can telephone network. "Johnny in Albany says that the NY Times has a poll about gay adoption! Quick, start working down your phone tree, get Our People out for a vote and make if fabulous! >:o !"

But, you know, your mileage may vary *g*

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]txvoodoo
2007-05-04 03:29 am UTC (link)
We need to organize this gay thing better. We're clearly failing on our initiatives ;)

(Reply to this)(Parent)


(Read comments) -

 
   
Privacy Policy - COPPA
Legal Disclaimer - Site Map