Log In

Home
    - Create Journal
    - Update
    - Download

LiveJournal
    - News
    - Paid Accounts
    - Contributors

Customize
    - Customize Journal
    - Create Style
    - Edit Style

Find Users
    - Random!
    - By Region
    - By Interest
    - Search

Edit ...
    - Personal Info &
      Settings
    - Your Friends
    - Old Entries
    - Your Pictures
    - Your Password

Developer Area

Need Help?
    - Lost Password?
    - Freq. Asked
      Questions
    - Support Area



cookies taste better with funneh ([info]cookie_love) wrote in [info]otf_wank,
@ 2007-05-10 22:34:00


Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
I was checking my friends page over at LJ, when at the top I spot a post by nyjoder over at stupid_free. After some link checking, I think I've got the gist of why "twatwaffle" has his knickers in a twist.

You see, stupid_free linked to a post over at thequestionclub where njyoder was being a dick informing the OP that her icon was most misleading. It didn't show, in his tactful words, "how fat you truly are." Needless to say, there is wank (and a mod smackdown), which is why it was on stupid_free.

But that's not the only thing that made it to the community, as everyone's favorite long-winded wonder shows up himself. He's determine to help the stupid people of the world understand the true meaning of "misleading":

mis·lead /mɪsˈlid/ Pronunciation Key - Show Spelled Pronunciation[mis-leed] Pronunciation Key - Show IPA Pronunciation verb, -led, -lead·ing. –verb (used with object) 1. to lead or guide wrongly; lead astray. 2. to lead into error of conduct, thought, or judgment. –verb (used without object) 3. to be misleading; tend to deceive: vague directions that often mislead

Clearly, people with icons of anime characters and animals are intending to deceive people into think that they're not actually live human beings! And just look at all the people who fell into the deception...all, 0 of them. And people using real pictures of themselves on the internet that deliberately try to hide their ugliness? Not deceptive at all. People never try to do that anyway. Prediction: many stupid, unrelated and uncreative insults to this post, because they lack the ability to defend their ignorance of the word 'misleading.'


Did anyone defend their ignorance of misleading? I honestly don't know. Did everyone and their brother poke/mock the troll? You bet your sweet ass they did.


(Read comments) - (Post a new comment)

Re: Talk about misleading...
[info]cookie_love
2007-05-12 03:43 am UTC (link)
Ahhh, so you realized that I was right and abandoned your previous "it must be in the dictionary because I say so" line of argument.

*headdesk*
*headdesk*
*HEADDESK*

No, no, NO you smug idiot. I'm trying to show you that even by your own faulty logic, you are WRONG!

There is nothing, NOTHING, in the results to prove your point. It means no matter how you slice it, you are wrong.

So out of curiosity, how many uses must a word have before it's consider correct?

Are you on crack? How many times to I have to tell you I'm not the only that's making you wrong here. Ask the experts why you are wrong. They're the ones shooting you down.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

Re: Talk about misleading...
[info]njyoder
2007-05-12 03:50 am UTC (link)
Oh, so you giving up that indefensible point was just coincidence? I DARE you to defend the points you gave up. Come on, I want to see you humiliate yourself more. ;)

I'm trying to show you that even by your own faulty logic, you are WRONG!

Really? My logic was "if one random word/term is more common than another, the less common one is incorrect"? Interesting. I don't remember saying that, could you please quote me?

I like how "millions" is nothing, though.

There is nothing, NOTHING, in the results to prove your point.

As opposed to you, with you "COME ON GUYZ IM RITTTTE THE EXPERTS AGREE WITH ME< REAALLY < I CANT CITE THEM OR ANYTHING AND I CANT DO ANYTHING BUT POINT AT THE DICTIONARY LIKE A RETARDED GORILAL< BUT IM RITE!!"

But you're right, millions = nothing significant.

How many times to I have to tell you I'm not the only that's making you wrong here.

HAHAHAHA--you did what I predicted you would do, YOU EVADED, you coward. AHAHAHAHAHA

Go look up arguentum ad nauseam, seriously. You aren't "making my wrong." You have presented no proof for your argument. As I said, you're just screaming like a retarded ape "IM RITE IM RITE" and then you threw a strawman argument at me--accusing me of saying something that I never said.

Ask the experts why you are wrong. They're the ones shooting you down.

ROFL HAHAHAHAHA What experts? Sources, please. You haven't quoted a single expert in support of you, Einstein. Here's a hint: if you actually asked some linguists about this, you'd realize how dead wrong you are. As you have never asked experts, nor studied linguistics, you wouldn't know.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


(Read comments) -

 
   
Privacy Policy - COPPA
Legal Disclaimer - Site Map