Log In

Home
    - Create Journal
    - Update
    - Download

LiveJournal
    - News
    - Paid Accounts
    - Contributors

Customize
    - Customize Journal
    - Create Style
    - Edit Style

Find Users
    - Random!
    - By Region
    - By Interest
    - Search

Edit ...
    - Personal Info &
      Settings
    - Your Friends
    - Old Entries
    - Your Pictures
    - Your Password

Developer Area

Need Help?
    - Lost Password?
    - Freq. Asked
      Questions
    - Support Area



cookies taste better with funneh ([info]cookie_love) wrote in [info]otf_wank,
@ 2007-05-10 22:34:00


Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
I was checking my friends page over at LJ, when at the top I spot a post by nyjoder over at stupid_free. After some link checking, I think I've got the gist of why "twatwaffle" has his knickers in a twist.

You see, stupid_free linked to a post over at thequestionclub where njyoder was being a dick informing the OP that her icon was most misleading. It didn't show, in his tactful words, "how fat you truly are." Needless to say, there is wank (and a mod smackdown), which is why it was on stupid_free.

But that's not the only thing that made it to the community, as everyone's favorite long-winded wonder shows up himself. He's determine to help the stupid people of the world understand the true meaning of "misleading":

mis·lead /mɪsˈlid/ Pronunciation Key - Show Spelled Pronunciation[mis-leed] Pronunciation Key - Show IPA Pronunciation verb, -led, -lead·ing. –verb (used with object) 1. to lead or guide wrongly; lead astray. 2. to lead into error of conduct, thought, or judgment. –verb (used without object) 3. to be misleading; tend to deceive: vague directions that often mislead

Clearly, people with icons of anime characters and animals are intending to deceive people into think that they're not actually live human beings! And just look at all the people who fell into the deception...all, 0 of them. And people using real pictures of themselves on the internet that deliberately try to hide their ugliness? Not deceptive at all. People never try to do that anyway. Prediction: many stupid, unrelated and uncreative insults to this post, because they lack the ability to defend their ignorance of the word 'misleading.'


Did anyone defend their ignorance of misleading? I honestly don't know. Did everyone and their brother poke/mock the troll? You bet your sweet ass they did.


(Read comments) - (Post a new comment)

Re: Talk about misleading...
[info]cookie_love
2007-05-12 04:06 am UTC (link)
Oh. My. GAWD.

You are not attempting to make that argument after trying to pass off the "elite few" as "common". Tell me you are not. Please. Convince me. :D

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

Re: Talk about misleading...
[info]njyoder
2007-05-12 04:11 am UTC (link)
Who passed the "elite few" off as "common"? Are you confusing people with words?

P.S. Have the voices in your head stopped?

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

Re: Talk about misleading...
[info]cookie_love
2007-05-12 04:44 am UTC (link)
Who passed the "elite few" off as "common"?

I was referring to your attempt to pass off an obvious minority of search results (and obvious typos/spelling errors [I'm doing that for the LOLs]) as a common means of saying "eachother".

I mean, from what you've been pushing, the "elite few" that made a mistake in their typing are really just the overlooked "common" users of a word you're totally convinced is correct.

I just found it funny, is all.


P.S. Have the voices in your head stopped?
Don't confuse me with your druggie friends, please.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

Re: Talk about misleading...
[info]njyoder
2007-05-12 04:51 am UTC (link)
Oh, so you were confusing people and words. Gotcha.

You see, we have over a billion English speakers in the world, so it's fair to say that they are an 'elite few.'

I already asked you about this and you just evaded. This is a 'minority of search results' compared to what? Of all possible search results for all English words? That would be analogous in this regard--the entire population of English speakers vs. all English words.

There are billions of pages indexed by Google, so any individual search would be a 'minority of the search results.' Any given word would also be a 'minority of the search results.' Compared to the massive amount you get from the aggregate of all searches for all English words.

You compared the search results of 'each other' and 'eachother,' and I previously asked how this comparison determines correctness. That is, what difference does it make if one happens to show up more than the other? You never answered.

I expect you to read this, engage in cognitive dissonance and then act as if it went over your head.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

Re: Talk about misleading...
[info]cookie_love
2007-05-12 05:04 am UTC (link)
You see, we have over a billion English speakers in the world, so it's fair to say that they are an 'elite few.'...

...and yada yada yada.

You are still wrong.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

Re: Talk about misleading...
[info]njyoder
2007-05-12 05:06 am UTC (link)
Do you get dizzy running in circles?

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

Re: Talk about misleading...
[info]cookie_love
2007-05-12 05:19 am UTC (link)
Do you get dizzy running in circles?

Do you get tired of being a twatwaffle?

Still wrong, btw.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


(Read comments) -

 
   
Privacy Policy - COPPA
Legal Disclaimer - Site Map