Log In

Home
    - Create Journal
    - Update
    - Download

LiveJournal
    - News
    - Paid Accounts
    - Contributors

Customize
    - Customize Journal
    - Create Style
    - Edit Style

Find Users
    - Random!
    - By Region
    - By Interest
    - Search

Edit ...
    - Personal Info &
      Settings
    - Your Friends
    - Old Entries
    - Your Pictures
    - Your Password

Developer Area

Need Help?
    - Lost Password?
    - Freq. Asked
      Questions
    - Support Area



chili_power ([info]chili_power) wrote in [info]otf_wank,
@ 2007-05-25 12:18:00


Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
Buns? On MY tummy?

Cute Overload is the best proof for the fact that people will wank over everything.

Today's topic: Cats and bunnies. More precisely, this video of Scooby the cat and three baby buns. The general "aww" comments proceed until ... (Links are not to any user profiles but to the comments).


chelle07:  Wow, that wasn't cool.

The poor cat clearly was not impressed with the bunnies being dropped on him, and he got in trouble when he reacted the way a cat would.

warrior rabbit:  Sigh. Prepare for commentroversy. Shall we take bets? Will it go over 300? 500?

Good guess! 293 comments and counting plus 73 on youtube (which is after all worth 8 pages over there).


Proud Owner of Cats:  Way to go on making a cat neurotic, eh? I have four cats and what she's doing is simply ridiculous. All in the name of "cute".

STOP! In the naaame of cuuute~ ... sorry *shuffles away*


Proud Owner of Cats: If I saw a mom repeatedly forcing a child to react nicely to something she she doesn't want to touch and punishing her for reacting and CONTINUE FORCING her child etc etc I'd say she's f'ing neurotic and she's trying to make her kid neurotic. Same applies to pets.

More delicious tl;dr wank down in the comments where people fight each other off the soapboxes. Bunnies on cat, not cute!  No, owner bopping cat not cute! NO, she's just trying to train them! Yes, but she's doing it WRONG! No, the owner is just a SPO in general! Domestic pets love each other, idiots! You are all crazy! You support torture! Omg comment oppreshun!



(Read comments) - (Post a new comment)


[info]makeshyft
2007-05-25 11:23 am UTC (link)
If I saw a mom repeatedly forcing a child to react nicely to something she she doesn't want to touch and punishing her for reacting and CONTINUE FORCING her child etc etc I'd say she's f'ing neurotic and she's trying to make her kid neurotic.

So, by this logic.. forcing kids to eat veggies and kiss old relatives equals RAEP!

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]rachelmap
2007-05-25 03:59 pm UTC (link)
Or "getting civilized." One of those, anyway.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]ravenclaw_devi
2007-05-27 01:53 am UTC (link)
Not to bring the unfunny, but - while forcing kids to kiss old relatives/anyone may not constitute rape in and of itself, it does run counter to teaching kids the "no one may touch you against your will/in a way that makes you uncomfortable; if someone does, tell an adult you trust" principle that may one day protect them from molestation. Personally, I'd rather have Aunt Minnie be offended that my [as of yet hypothetical] kid rejects her sloppy kisses and have said kid live with the understanding that her physical boundaries are sacred and she has a right to speak up in defence of said boundaries.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


(Read comments) -

 
   
Privacy Policy - COPPA
Legal Disclaimer - Site Map