Log In

Home
    - Create Journal
    - Update
    - Download

LiveJournal
    - News
    - Paid Accounts
    - Contributors

Customize
    - Customize Journal
    - Create Style
    - Edit Style

Find Users
    - Random!
    - By Region
    - By Interest
    - Search

Edit ...
    - Personal Info &
      Settings
    - Your Friends
    - Old Entries
    - Your Pictures
    - Your Password

Developer Area

Need Help?
    - Lost Password?
    - Freq. Asked
      Questions
    - Support Area



Ms. Katonic ([info]ms_katonic) wrote in [info]otf_wank,
@ 2007-06-20 21:12:00


Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
Current mood:Mildly Amused

Wanted: Hot woman to sexually service couple. Must be prepared to emigrate.
The ever productive [info]polyamory community is at it again, folks.

It all started when a newbie, [info]timetraveler7, posted to the community with an introduction.

My wife and I are polyamorists without living polyamory. Imagine how we felt when we discovered that. Now all we need is some friends of like persuasion, with who we can gab and gab about such a nice thing as LOVE. We live in Belize, Central America--having recently emigrated. We have lots of room in paradise for friends and visitors. In partaicular, we think we would like to find that special "she" who might like to get to know us...with whom we can dream. Or more. Anyone out there like to get to know us?

Trouble kicks off right away, as observant members note that it's against community rules to post intro posts and personal ads without including a topic for general discussion. [info]timetraveler7 acknowledges this but does nothing about it, citing not knowing how as a defence. The mod intervenes, tersely requesting it be edited. And then things kick off, as [info]nine_waters takes offence to the mod doing her job (o noes!) and flounces out. The snarking commences.

Minor, as these things go. Wait. It gets better. [info]timetraveler7 reveals more about himself... and people, it's good.

[info]mactavish points out the obvious flaws in his quest - namely that a) suppose the person they start dating goes off one of them, and b) who the hell's going to leave their whole life behind and emigrate to fucking Belize? (Except a bit politer than that, but you get my drift.)

Mr. Time Traveler responds with a potted biography that notably fails to give a straight answer to either point but does contain abuse of the English language that brings tears to the eyes. In which we discover that he's 66 and he's on his second (third?) wife... who is 29. He met her online and married her after a two-week in person courtship. And to top it all off... he's a Mormon polygamist who believes men are naturally polygamous by nature. Also claims to be seeking friendship more than anything else, and it's completely not about the sex... but adamantly insists that the third he's after HAS to be a woman, because he and his wife don't trust men.

There's plenty here to mock, but my personal favourite has to be the bit about the frustrating pidgeon called Creole. My inner linguist is cringing, but my inner child loves the mental image...



(Read comments) - (Post a new comment)


[info]lottelita
2007-06-21 01:32 am UTC (link)
(Yes, I did read the article. :) But clearly fundamentalist LDS does exist. QED.)

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]sepiamagpie
2007-06-21 03:13 am UTC (link)
Dude, don't be obnoxious.

Also, they aren't mormons. If they're denied by the actual official body, they are not, in fact, mormons. Whatever they call themselves is immaterial.

Also.

What do you call a pig that does karate?
A pork chop.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]lottelita
2007-06-21 03:18 am UTC (link)
If my comment meets the definition of "obnoxious" around here, then I guess we've become a kinder, gentler otf_wank. The Cult of Nice prevails in the end? Film at eleven.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]sepiamagpie
2007-06-21 03:19 am UTC (link)
Yeah, it does, you little twit.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]hearsawho
2007-06-21 04:13 am UTC (link)
"Don't be obnoxious" does not translate to "don't be mean." It translates to "shut up, you are being stupid."

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]tez
2007-06-21 03:27 am UTC (link)
Also, they aren't mormons. If they're denied by the actual official body, they are not, in fact, mormons. Whatever they call themselves is immaterial.

My church history professor couldn't have phrased it any better.

Also, I like pork chops.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]dragonfangirl
2007-06-21 12:04 pm UTC (link)
This is fascinating.

Not the theology, the wank. I haven't seen so much name-flinging during an otherwise apparently sane and civil discussion since.. uh... 1985!

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]sepiamagpie
2007-06-21 08:15 pm UTC (link)
Wrong comment. Unless 'dude' is an insult. My surferese is a little rusty. :(

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]puipui
2007-06-21 10:19 pm UTC (link)
Maybe she was referring to the "pork chop" thing? Although I've always thought of "pork chop" as more of a term of endearment, really.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]influencethis
2007-06-22 07:13 pm UTC (link)
Perhaps she is referring to the summation of the wank, and since you have smacked it down at its high point, you are the appropriate point at which to remark upon it.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]sepiamagpie
2007-06-22 07:15 pm UTC (link)
Perhaps! I thought she just got it confused where I called Lotte a twit.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]napalmnacey
2007-06-23 12:31 pm UTC (link)
When I was a kid, other kids would tell me 'dude' meant 'camel dick'. Nowadays I have to wonder where the hell they came up with that.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]puipui
2007-06-21 04:55 am UTC (link)
Ah. So does that mean that Crazy Mel Gibson is, in fact, actually Catholic, even though what he really practices is some sort of bizarre mirror-universe version that he started himself that doesn't follow Vatican II: Electric Boogaloo at all and isn't actually affiliated with the Roman Catholic church and if you asked the pope if Mel Gibson was Catholic hat-dude would laugh in your face, just because the crazy freak and his crazy freak father and his crazy freak friends call themselves "Traditionalist Catholic"?

Good to know, good to know. Totally wrong, of course, but good to know.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]delcj
2007-06-21 05:06 am UTC (link)
that sort of makes me want to meet Pope Palpatine Benedict so i can ask him if Mel Gibson is Catholic and he can laugh, because it would be nice to see if he actually can laugh hard.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]puipui
2007-06-21 06:16 am UTC (link)
He probably laughs a scary laugh that makes him look even more evil. D:

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]missdaisy
2007-06-21 05:00 pm UTC (link)
It's frightening just to contemplate.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]lottelita
2007-06-21 05:16 am UTC (link)
The reading comprehension is not strong here tonight.

FLDS != LDS. But pretending that FLDS doesn't exist because LALALALALA THE NICE MORMONS DON'T WANT IT TO is absurd. Is it separate from the mainline Church? Of course it is. But it does exist, and it is part of Joseph Smith's legacy.

Regarding the Gibsons -- unless the Pope excommunicates someone, that person is Catholic. And millions of practicing Catholics have major issues with Vatican II and still receive communion. Sounds pretty Catholic to me.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]mindset
2007-06-21 05:54 am UTC (link)
you're doing this on purpose, aren't you. :(

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]puipui
2007-06-21 06:05 am UTC (link)
So... if I just went out and bought some communion wafers, and then rented out a big building and hired somebody to feed me said wafers every Sunday while throwing some Latin around, and I called myself Catholic, then I would be Catholic? Even though I wouldn't be affiliated with the actual really-and-truly Roman Catholic church at all? Because that's essentially what Mel Gibson has done, and it sounds pretty Catholic to you. And you are, of course, the final arbiter of that kind of thing, as opposed to the actual people who are actually part of the actual religion.

I understand what you're trying to get at, here, I think, something along the lines of the "you don't get to call other people not Christian just because they do something you don't like" argument, it sounds like, and that's a totally valid argument when used correctly, but I don't think you quite understand that what you're saying sounds more like "you don't get to call other people not Amish just because they drive sports cars and wear lots of bling and like to play first-person shooter games".

Torturing Jews and burning witches are part of Catholicism's legacy, as you put it, but I can pretty much guarantee that if a group came to light that called themselves Fundamentalist Catholic that encouraged Jew-torturing and witch-burning just like in the olden days, the Roman Catholic church would be the first to yell "Not Catholic!" and anyone who disagreed with them would be idiots to do so. It's this thing that religion does where it grows and evolves and changes over time, obviously you haven't heard of it.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]puipui
2007-06-21 06:10 am UTC (link)
if a group came to light that called themselves Fundamentalist Catholic that encouraged Jew-torturing and witch-burning just like in the olden days

Note: This may, in fact, be exactly what Mel Gibson's wacky cult thingie does, I'm not entirely sure. Are they sedevacantists? Conclavists? I have no idea.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]lottelita
2007-06-21 06:23 am UTC (link)
And you are, of course, the final arbiter of that kind of thing, as opposed to the actual people who are actually part of the actual religion.

The people who actually part of the actual religion -- like, you know, the Vatican -- hasn't excommunicated Mel Gibson. Sounds like he's Catholic to them, so it sounds like he's Catholic to me.

I don't think you quite understand that what you're saying sounds more like "you don't get to call other people not Amish just because they drive sports cars and wear lots of bling and like to play first-person shooter games".

I don't think it sounds like that at all. That's the lovely thing about communication, though: I say one thing, you hear another, we pretend we're sixth-graders, fun for the whole family.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]puipui
2007-06-21 06:41 am UTC (link)
The people who actually part of the actual religion -- like, you know, the Vatican -- hasn't excommunicated Mel Gibson. Sounds like he's Catholic to them, so it sounds like he's Catholic to me.

Actually, if you had even bothered looking into the "Traditionalist Catholic" issue at all, you... oh, fuck it. Clearly you are going to be at this all night, because you are just that stupid, and you truly believe that everyone else has all the reading comprehension and communication problems here, when, in fact, it all comes down to you. I would be better off trying to explain this shit to my cat's ass that to you, as it would make more of an attempt to understand.

Are you always this much of a douche? No, really, be honest, are you?

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]lottelita, 2007-06-21 06:47 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]puipui, 2007-06-21 06:49 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]puipui, 2007-06-21 06:45 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]lottelita, 2007-06-21 06:48 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]puipui, 2007-06-21 06:59 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]lottelita, 2007-06-21 07:04 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]puipui, 2007-06-21 07:28 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]lottelita, 2007-06-21 01:50 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]puipui, 2007-06-21 05:12 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]tez, 2007-06-21 05:24 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]lottelita, 2007-06-21 08:19 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]mrbimble, 2007-07-01 04:00 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]vito_excalibur, 2007-06-21 02:00 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]lottelita, 2007-06-21 02:10 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]ecchaniz0r, 2007-06-22 03:14 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]white_serpent, 2007-06-21 04:39 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]tez, 2007-06-21 04:42 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]lottelita, 2007-06-21 08:24 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]hearsawho, 2007-06-21 09:59 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]ecchaniz0r, 2007-06-22 03:15 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]faultypremise, 2007-06-22 04:01 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]rachel_pi, 2007-06-22 01:29 am UTC

[info]ladyvorkosigan
2007-06-21 11:43 am UTC (link)
Well, honestly, kind of, right? I mean, I guess people have different opinions on this, but I tend to identify people with what they self-identify as rather than what another branch of the religion identifies them as. Which doesn't excuse one from knowing the doctrinal differences between groups, but . . . otherwise the policing problem is too hard (THIS group gets to call themselves Christians, and THIS group gets to call themselves Muslims, but THIS group doesn't). Again, of course there are differences, and I know that some groups don't consider various offshoot groups to be the religion they identify as, but using the terms people self-identify as while being aware of underlying differences still seems fairest to me.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]ladyvorkosigan, 2007-06-21 11:47 am UTC

[info]airawyn
2007-06-22 10:47 pm UTC (link)
I was walking across a bridge one day, and I saw a man standing on the edge, about to jump off. So I ran over and said "Stop! don't do it!"

"Why shouldn't I?" he said.

I said, "Well, there's so much to live for!"

He said, "Like what?" I said, "Well...are you religious or atheist?"

He said, "Religious." I said, "Me too! Are you Christian or Buddhist?"

He said, "Christian." I said, "Me too! Are you Catholic or Protestant?"

He said, "Protestant." I said, "Me too! Are you Episcopalian or Baptist?"

He said, "Baptist!"

I said,"Wow! Me too! Are you Baptist Church of God or Baptist Church of the Lord?"

He said, "Baptist Church of God!"

I said, "Me too! Are you Original Baptist Church of God, or are you Reformed Baptist Church of God?"

He said,"Reformed Baptist Church of God!"

I said, "Me too! Are you Reformed Baptist Church of God, Reformation of 1879, or Reformed Baptist Church of God, Reformation of 1915?"

He said, "Reformed Baptist Church of God, Reformation of 1915!"

I said, "Die, heretic scum", and pushed him off.


-- Emo Phillips

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]puipui, 2007-06-22 10:59 pm UTC

[info]rachel_pi
2007-06-22 01:33 am UTC (link)
Technically, I think that excommunicated Catholics are still nominally Catholic, because they can go to Mass and all, but they are forbidden from taking communion until they reconcile with the Church.

However, you are right that the Vatican isn't going to be jumping up and down to claim Gibson and the sedevacantists and conclavists. I like the Tridentine Mass and all, but there is a whole bucket of crazy associated with those movements.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


(Read comments) -

 
   
Privacy Policy - COPPA
Legal Disclaimer - Site Map