Log In

Home
    - Create Journal
    - Update
    - Download

LiveJournal
    - News
    - Paid Accounts
    - Contributors

Customize
    - Customize Journal
    - Create Style
    - Edit Style

Find Users
    - Random!
    - By Region
    - By Interest
    - Search

Edit ...
    - Personal Info &
      Settings
    - Your Friends
    - Old Entries
    - Your Pictures
    - Your Password

Developer Area

Need Help?
    - Lost Password?
    - Freq. Asked
      Questions
    - Support Area



Dash O'Pepper ([info]pfeffermuse) wrote in [info]otf_wank,
@ 2007-07-15 15:50:00


Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
Poor Skills + Furry Baby Kink + Silk PJs + Stupid Free = Wank
Bring the marshmallows.

Tailfox makes a post to Poor_Skills (a community for living frugally), asking for help to remove a stain from a pair of silk pajamas.

Of course, that wasn't how Tailfox phrased it. Rather, he asked for help in "quickly removing caca from silk jammies before his 'daddy' returned home . . . his diaper leaked . . . while watching his Teletubbies DVDs." Although the original post is now deleted, Belladona provides screencaps and continuing mock at Stupid_Free.

This might have ended with just the bahleetion and the mock on Stupid_Free, but you can't keep a good troll down.

Tailfox's "daddy" Davefox Davewolf makes a follow-up post on Poor_Skills, using Tailfox's LJ account, to cast blame on the Poor_Skills member who gave his widdle bwabie instructions for mixing bleach with other household chemicals, and he therefore demands reimbursement for the $150 cost of the silk pajamas.

Some Poor_Skills members play with the troll, others mock, and some others -- well, we're not sure if they've figured things out yet.

And tk_creations is looking for an e-lawyer in Poor_Skills, since "daddy" furry is threatening to e-sue.

ETA (2): Stupid_Free continues the mock with a [recently unlocked] post concerning "daddy" furry.

All in all, a wonderfully bizarre wank on a lazy Sunday afternoon.

(Self-disclosure, I made one post in Poor_Skills for the LoLz.)

ETA (1): To remove link to locked post on Stupid_Free, and to fix links.

ETA (3): And Tailfox officially jumps the shark with his newest post in Poor_Skills.
(Thanks to ladystarlight for the link. Also, thanks to izzy23 for the "jump the shark" reference.)

ETA (4): Bahleeted from Poor_Skills. However, the mock continues at Stupid_Free.

And it looks like another troll has infiltrated Poor_Skills. This time bringing a boring racist post.

ETA (5): And what does any mod, looking to eliminate trolls from s/he/its community do? Ban the trolls? Freeze the posts? Delete said offending posts? No, delete the entire community. That's right folks, mod impi-batso takes her Poor_Skills community and goes home. That'll show all the meanies that being poor is serious business.

Once more Clarissa Stupid_Free explains it all.

mindiloohoo creates a new community. As does _biotch. As does journalismgirl. Except for being previous members of Poor_Skills, none appear to be affiliated with the original mod. So, we now have poor_skills2, poorskillz and poorskills to replace the loss of Poor_Skills. It's a good time to be poor.

At this moment, poor_skills2 appears to be the heir apparent, with poorskillz being the troll bait snark community, leaving poorskills to bring up the rear.

This seems to be the wank that keeps on giving. And based on some posts in Stupid_Free, it just might.

Wank is something that even the poor can afford.

ETA (6): It's back. And whatever the mod's locked now-deleted post was, it must have been good.


(Read comments) - (Post a new comment)


eviemouse
2007-07-15 09:49 pm UTC (link)
Seems the stupid_free links are dead. :-(

Still, this was worth it alone for the following quote I found on Wikipedia while trying to find out what exactly a "babyfur" is.

For diaper lovers, the search is difficult because there are few diaper lovers in the general population. Most people aren't particularly aroused by diapers.

Wikipedia is surely educating.

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]smo
2007-07-15 09:52 pm UTC (link)
Davewolf's post still works!

I think since you two are in a contract like this...umm, you should have been expecting poo stained silk pjs! No reason to make such a fuss! I mean he is only your widdle babyfur foxling! Show some love for the cute rascal, he didn't know any better!!

I LOL'D.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


eviemouse
2007-07-15 09:59 pm UTC (link)
Yes, I found it right now!

I'm almost wetting myself with laughing like a lunatic here.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]smo
2007-07-15 11:45 pm UTC (link)
Oh noes, be careful you don't muss your silk jammies!

This is truly one of the lulziest wanks I've come across in a while.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]barankhy
2007-07-16 12:55 am UTC (link)
Y'know, in context, that kinda makes sense.
...
I'm not sure whether that's scary and I should hide, or whether I should just remove my brain with a spork for getting that point ;_;

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]smo
2007-07-16 12:57 am UTC (link)
No, I think it does make sense. Someone who likes to pretend they're an infant animal shouldn't be expected to control their bodily functions - or, for that matter, know how not to get into flame wars on the internet.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]barankhy
2007-07-16 01:18 am UTC (link)
Yeah, my brain can remain intact :D
And yup, the point of infants of any species is pretty much eating, shitting and not dying; perfect control of bodily function is not.

As for the second part, though, this is where nevertheless common sense should kick in, the roleplay should stop and I'd like to invoke a case of "You're kink is okay, but for the love of the Baby Jesus, don't tell us about it" on both of them.
Of course, we wouldn't get the wank then, but it's a general feeling I have about such things.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]smo
2007-07-16 01:20 am UTC (link)
Or, to put it another way, "You can tell us about your kink, but in so doing, you run the risk of us finding it disgusting/lolarious/both."

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]barankhy
2007-07-16 01:47 am UTC (link)
I like your way of thinking, and would also like to subscribe to your newsletter.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]smo
2007-07-16 01:53 am UTC (link)
First three months are free!

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]barankhy
2007-07-16 02:14 am UTC (link)
How much afterwars?
Blood of a virgin, my firstborn, or the kidneys of strangers?

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]smo
2007-07-16 02:46 am UTC (link)
Cookies will suffice. Or boobies. Whichever is more expedient.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]barankhy
2007-07-16 03:06 am UTC (link)
Does this suffice as an advance payment then?



In case of emergeny, I can always declare GIP of Payment.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]smo, 2007-07-16 03:33 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]barankhy, 2007-07-16 03:41 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]smo, 2007-07-16 03:42 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]barankhy, 2007-07-16 03:46 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]rennyn_alerothi, 2007-07-16 04:06 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]barankhy, 2007-07-16 04:20 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]smo, 2007-07-16 06:23 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]barankhy, 2007-07-16 06:36 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]wankaholic, 2007-07-16 07:31 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]barankhy, 2007-07-16 08:33 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]deliciouschaos, 2007-07-16 07:37 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]barankhy, 2007-07-16 08:34 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]irised, 2007-07-16 09:11 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]barankhy, 2007-07-16 09:15 am UTC

[info]honorh
2007-07-16 07:07 am UTC (link)
Hey! Quit it with the "blood of a virgin"--if you want to hire a professional virgin, you must understand that sacrifices must be symbolic only. NO BLOOD.

Be happy to supply a list of my rates if you're interested, of course.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]barankhy, 2007-07-16 07:15 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]chaimonkey, 2007-07-16 05:19 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]honorh, 2007-07-16 10:56 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]barankhy, 2007-07-16 11:09 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]honorh, 2007-07-17 02:17 am UTC

[info]pfeffermuse
2007-07-15 09:53 pm UTC (link)
I fixed the Stupid_Free links. My html skills still aren't very good.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


eviemouse
2007-07-15 10:00 pm UTC (link)
Great - even more amusement!

(Reply to this)(Parent)


eviemouse
2007-07-15 10:00 pm UTC (link)
Err, make that "educational". Me no speak English good.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]sashenka
2007-07-15 11:56 pm UTC (link)
Most people aren't particularly aroused by diapers.
I'm the majority! *does a dance*

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


eviemouse
2007-07-16 12:04 am UTC (link)
I love how they saw the need to point that out in the article.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]sashenka
2007-07-16 12:20 am UTC (link)
It's like validation that we didn't need for not having a creapy kink!

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]luthe
2007-07-16 03:54 am UTC (link)
Most people aren't David Vitter. /political humor

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


eviemouse
2007-07-16 08:02 am UTC (link)
*googles, for she is not an American*

Oh. Dear. *sporfle*

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]missdaisy
2007-07-16 02:08 pm UTC (link)
Most people aren't particularly aroused by diapers.

Do you have a source for that?

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


eviemouse
2007-07-16 03:30 pm UTC (link)
I DEMAND PROOF!

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]cmdr_zoom
2007-07-18 04:47 pm UTC (link)
"Pics or it didn't happen."

(Reply to this)(Parent)


(Read comments) -

 
   
Privacy Policy - COPPA
Legal Disclaimer - Site Map