Log In

Home
    - Create Journal
    - Update
    - Download

LiveJournal
    - News
    - Paid Accounts
    - Contributors

Customize
    - Customize Journal
    - Create Style
    - Edit Style

Find Users
    - Random!
    - By Region
    - By Interest
    - Search

Edit ...
    - Personal Info &
      Settings
    - Your Friends
    - Old Entries
    - Your Pictures
    - Your Password

Developer Area

Need Help?
    - Lost Password?
    - Freq. Asked
      Questions
    - Support Area



knightrider ([info]knightrider) wrote in [info]otf_wank,
@ 2007-07-22 20:37:00
Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
My wankings, let me show you them.
OK, even yours truly is busy over where the REAL wank is happening tonight, but I may I bring you a smallish [info]cat_macros wank, a palate-cleanser? Nothing too hysterical yet, but it's probably one to watch in case you get sick of the Harry Potter wank.

Over on [info]cat_macros someone posts a cheeky macro. Very slightly NWS if you work at the Vatican(No nudity, but the caption is a little bawdy).

[info]ebneter (not a mod, apparently just a Concerned Netizen), wants it cut-tagged and warned for in case anyone is reading their flist at work.

[info]einheitstochter (not the OP) tactfully and verbosely expresses polite surprise at [info]ebneter's request. A similar sentiment is echoed with even more diplomacy by [info]ladylynx.

We've seen it all before, no?

"If you're reading LJ at work you deserve to get in trouble!"

"Did I say *I* was in trouble?"

"This is not a worksafe community anyway!"

"Think of the CHILDREN!" (presumably the ones reading LJ, while they're at work)

And...There be macros WITHIN the macro wank. </a>. Will it go on forever, replicating over and over, like a fractal?

(Post a new comment)


[info]eilan
2007-07-22 10:41 am UTC (link)
Legs are NSFW? Or should not be seen by parents/small children? Where do these people live?

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]knightrider
2007-07-22 10:42 am UTC (link)
It's obviously the lewd look on that cat's face.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]an_igor
2007-07-22 11:50 pm UTC (link)
I do not know from whence *you* come, good fir/madam, but in thefe partf it if quite unfeemly for a lady of proper breeding to fhow her anklef to any but her own good and true hufband, and then only under cover of darkneff. May the Lord fave uf all in thefe ungodly timef

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]mydemand
2007-07-23 12:34 am UTC (link)
That just shows up as a pile of "F"s to me. yes, good Fir, it is very unfeemly to fhow your anklef.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]an_igor
2007-07-23 01:06 am UTC (link)
They are fs! In certain fonts they look like fancy curly esses. Granted, not this one.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]wickedwitch
2007-07-23 04:26 pm UTC (link)
Heh, I remember this scene from "The Vicar of Dibley" when Alice (the verger) was reading from a very old Bible and pronouncing all the "s"es as "f"s. The vicar understandably cut her off when she got to "the Lord is my succor." :-)

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]sharps
2007-07-23 11:26 pm UTC (link)
Was that the one where they were on Songs of Praise? Ah, lovely...

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]wickedwitch
2007-07-23 11:44 pm UTC (link)
Yeah. Classic episode.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]eilan
2007-07-23 06:53 am UTC (link)
Win.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]dragonfangirl
2007-07-24 04:23 am UTC (link)
I'm pretty sure that in the old script, S's only got converted to fs when in the middle of a word; not at the start or end.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]an_igor
2007-07-24 03:51 pm UTC (link)
Thanks for the information!

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]dragonfangirl
2007-07-24 08:20 pm UTC (link)
Illustration: Course becomes courfe, but events stays events.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]coyotegirl
2007-07-25 04:14 am UTC (link)
This comment made me giggle like a ninny. My husband looked at me funny. Where do I send your internets, my good sir/madam?

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]lady7jane
2007-07-22 11:14 am UTC (link)
We've seen it all before, no?

Yes, but not at work! It's not safe!

(Reply to this)


[info]alya1989262
2007-07-22 12:25 pm UTC (link)
The "You know what else is not safe for work?" macro is made of pure win... XDXDXD

It always amazes me that a comm about cat macros can be so wanky. They're amusing pictures of cute creatures with humourous text pasted on them. What the hell could have gone wrong, there?

(Reply to this)


[info]viralmemory
2007-07-22 04:56 pm UTC (link)
I support putting NSFW content behind a cut. But the qualifier is, it should be ACTUALLY not safe for work. Not, y'know, not-safe-for-the-convent.

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]airborne_rodent
2007-07-22 07:44 pm UTC (link)
I think nuns would be laughing at that myself. It's just not work safe for Puritan!America. OMG!!!!

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]shadowkitty
2007-07-23 01:35 pm UTC (link)
Considering I know nuns who send each other shock pictures, you may well be right.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]vzg
2007-07-30 07:33 pm UTC (link)
That is awesome.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]sisterelwood
2007-07-22 05:14 pm UTC (link)
That marco made me giggle like a school girl. I fail to see how it isn't safe. Most kids (I hope) wouldn't get it if they're under a certain age and someone in passing at work is going to be more concerned with you farting around on LJ than what you're looking at unless it's porn.

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]sisterelwood
2007-07-22 05:15 pm UTC (link)
MACRO even...

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]serai
2007-07-22 05:36 pm UTC (link)
That would be a very cute macro if it was in English. That baby-talk macro-speak is annoying.

But the idea is way funny.

(Reply to this)


[info]distractogirl
2007-07-22 07:12 pm UTC (link)
Obviously skirts and pretty shoes are no longer work safe. I shall make a note of this and continue my job hunt skirtless.

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]lil_miss_stfu
2007-07-22 07:22 pm UTC (link)
Y'know, that may possibly increase your chances of getting a job... Unless you're subbing pants for a skirt. But where's the fun in that?

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]distractogirl
2007-07-22 07:34 pm UTC (link)
Unless I'm very much mistake, turning up in my knickers might give the male employees unrealistic ideas as to how much fun they can have with me. So, while it might get me a job, it might also cause a small amount of bloodshed...

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]distractogirl
2007-07-22 07:36 pm UTC (link)
*mistaken. Of course it may be my typing skills that cause problems!

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]innsmouth_eyes
2007-07-23 05:45 am UTC (link)
That's the first cat macro that ever made me laugh out loud. But this one is pretty funny too. What wank?

(Reply to this)


[info]ebneter
2007-07-23 09:01 pm UTC (link)
Ahhhh, well, as I mentioned over on [info]cat_macros (here), I have no idea where my brain was on Friday. But when I find out, we're gonna have a little chat...

I am, however, still amused that people don't realize that there are workplaces where, you know, reading your friends-list is not a big deal.

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]lysana
2007-07-24 10:21 pm UTC (link)
But there is no such place. It's an illusion right up there with global warming.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]perletwo
2007-07-24 04:23 am UTC (link)
Um. Did they not notice that the subheader on the comm banner is "Post Some Fucking Cats?" I mean, by the OP's logic the entire comm is therefore NSFW.

(Reply to this)


[info]queencallipygos
2007-07-24 02:28 pm UTC (link)
On the one hand, I actually see what about that macro is making someone scream "NSFW" -- not the picture, but the text itself (because the joke is a riff on "pussy", nudge nudge, wink wink).

On the other hand -- we're talking about a community where the mod's default icon is a picture of herself posing with a male sex toy, so I don't see what the big deal is.

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]vzg
2007-07-30 07:37 pm UTC (link)
But if anyone is hanging over your shoulder enough to put two and two together, they either don't care or were probably planning on reprimanding you anyway...

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]shaysdays
2007-07-24 09:28 pm UTC (link)
The links aren't working...

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]shaysdays
2007-07-24 09:28 pm UTC (link)
Waiiiit a second- LJ seems to be down, too.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]lysana
2007-07-24 10:23 pm UTC (link)
There's been a power outage in downtown SF. Took my workplace and yanked it around five times in half an hour.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]ebneter
2007-07-24 11:33 pm UTC (link)
Yes. This is preventing me from reading [info]cat_macros at work.

(Reply to this)(Parent)

  
   
Privacy Policy - COPPA
Legal Disclaimer - Site Map