Log In

Home
    - Create Journal
    - Update
    - Download

LiveJournal
    - News
    - Paid Accounts
    - Contributors

Customize
    - Customize Journal
    - Create Style
    - Edit Style

Find Users
    - Random!
    - By Region
    - By Interest
    - Search

Edit ...
    - Personal Info &
      Settings
    - Your Friends
    - Old Entries
    - Your Pictures
    - Your Password

Developer Area

Need Help?
    - Lost Password?
    - Freq. Asked
      Questions
    - Support Area



Sorcha ([info]sorchar) wrote in [info]otf_wank,
@ 2007-08-30 15:10:00


Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
Entry tags:business

ADA Wank, with a side of Mac Vs. PC and Liberal Vs. Conservative!
So, two California women are suing Apple for alleged accessibility violations in its SF retail store. The comments on the article are, needless to say, wanky, with some complaining about the liberal activist agenda, allegations that the women are just out to make a quick buck, and the occasional disabled person chiming in on both sides of the issue.

Also, WTF is a "standing wheelchair?"



(Read comments) - (Post a new comment)


[info]ryuutchi
2007-08-31 01:14 am UTC (link)
The Apple store closest to my house looks like it would be hell for anyone disabled to use. ADA complaint, yes, but small and packed with tables and samples in such a way that would make it difficult for someone in a wheelchair to maneuver. Not to mention trying to talk to someone at that really tall Genius bar, while in a wheelchair? I can't see that being particularly pleasant.

Don't get me wrong, I love them-- they're generally as helpful and friendly as can possibly be. They're just not terribly disabled-friendly.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]frequentmouse
2007-08-31 02:11 am UTC (link)
Thing is, ADA doesn't guarantee absolute convenience of access, just "reasonable accomodation"- if you can get a wheelchair into the store and there is somebody to help you get productsto a level where you can see them, that's always been considered "reasonable accomodation."

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]ryuutchi
2007-08-31 03:32 am UTC (link)
I just said that the store was ADA compliant. But hell to use.

(Reply to this)(Parent)

*agrees*
[info]risha
2007-08-31 02:48 am UTC (link)
I've never seen an Apple store that has anything but high counters and tight aisles. And that's not even counting how they're usually so packed with people that it's hard even for the non-disabled to get to stuff.

On the positive side - the last time we bought something there (two iPod Nanos for Christmas gifts), we walked in the front and an employee standing right there asked if he could help us. We told him what we wanted, he went into the back and grabbed them for us, then checked us out and printed out a receipt using a handheld device. Took us less than five minutes and no standing in lines. I'm a big fan of that device.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


iwanttobeasleep
2007-08-31 03:19 am UTC (link)
I certainly think it's just as complaint as 99% of the other stores in the area. As hard as it might be to navigate their thin aisles, the department store racks can't be much easier.

Of course, our Apple store constantly packed to the point that it's hard for an able bodied person to move around in. And although the people working there are happy enough to help, you get to wait a half hour for them to work through everyone else who was already waiting.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


(Read comments) -

 
   
Privacy Policy - COPPA
Legal Disclaimer - Site Map