Log In

Home
    - Create Journal
    - Update
    - Download

LiveJournal
    - News
    - Paid Accounts
    - Contributors

Customize
    - Customize Journal
    - Create Style
    - Edit Style

Find Users
    - Random!
    - By Region
    - By Interest
    - Search

Edit ...
    - Personal Info &
      Settings
    - Your Friends
    - Old Entries
    - Your Pictures
    - Your Password

Developer Area

Need Help?
    - Lost Password?
    - Freq. Asked
      Questions
    - Support Area



velvet_mace ([info]velvet_mace) wrote in [info]otf_wank,
Honestly, I think the real question is: did they cut away for several seconds every time someone swore? Or did the simply make that bleep sound over the word for some people and cut entirely away for others. If they were using the same form of censorship (cutting away for several seconds to a still shot of an empty theatre) then they were just being consistant (if a bit hyperzealous). If they cut away for her and a couple others, but bleeped the word out for everyone else, then I'm going to wonder why they felt they had to go the extra 9 yards for such a mild swear word, and maybe there was another reason for it.

But anyway, the I still find the whole thing funny, especially how some news sources won't even suggest which swear word it was and others spell it out without using the universal wink and nudge of putting asterisks instead of vowels.


(Read comments)

Post a comment in response:

From:
( )Anonymous- this user has disabled anonymous posting.
Username:
Password:
Don't have an account? Create one now.
Subject:
No HTML allowed in subject
  
Message:
 
Notice! This user has turned on the option that logs your IP address when posting.
 
   
Privacy Policy - COPPA
Legal Disclaimer - Site Map