Log In

Home
    - Create Journal
    - Update
    - Download

LiveJournal
    - News
    - Paid Accounts
    - Contributors

Customize
    - Customize Journal
    - Create Style
    - Edit Style

Find Users
    - Random!
    - By Region
    - By Interest
    - Search

Edit ...
    - Personal Info &
      Settings
    - Your Friends
    - Old Entries
    - Your Pictures
    - Your Password

Developer Area

Need Help?
    - Lost Password?
    - Freq. Asked
      Questions
    - Support Area



Jon "Bad Wasabi" Wood ([info]mcity) wrote in [info]otf_wank,
@ 2007-11-20 15:28:00
Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
Entry tags:elitism

it's like wanking fish in a <br>
A blog that lists popular websites that still use Tables is dugg.

Cue hundreds of comments of Tables vs DIVs wank at both the blog and digg, including lots of mentions of Web 2.0 and people saying they went back to tables after that mean ol' CSS didn't work properly.

EDIT: Godwin's.


(Read comments) - (Post a new comment)


[info]whimsy_chan
2007-11-20 11:24 pm UTC (link)
I think one of the main things is that when your HTML doesn't have to describe the structure of the page as well as the content of the page, it's a lot neater and more logical. You can put your content in exactly the order it should be read in, so when a screen reader encounters it and tries to read it, it'll flow logically, just like it would for a sighted person viewing your site and using visual cues to follow the content.

(Reply to this)(Parent)

(Read comments) -

 
   
Privacy Policy - COPPA
Legal Disclaimer - Site Map