Entry tags:

it's like wanking fish in a <br>
A blog that lists popular websites that still use Tables is dugg.

Cue hundreds of comments of Tables vs DIVs wank at both the blog and digg, including lots of mentions of Web 2.0 and people saying they went back to tables after that mean ol' CSS didn't work properly.

EDIT: Godwin's.

(Read comments) - (Post a new comment)

grrliz
2007-11-21 03:32 am UTC (link)

YAY! Wank about a subject I care about!!

Table is really good for structuring your information and it’s better for search engine because it allows to make a difference between the structure and the graphism.

LMAO Isn't that the argument usually used in favour of divs?

I’ve been webdesigning for about 7 years now, and I don’t what is the problem with tables. Easier to manipulate, faster to put out.

Tables: like teenage girls with low self-esteem, in a way.

Anyway... CSS ALL THE WAY!!! [/thoughts on yaoi]

(Reply to this)(Thread)

	mindset 2007-11-21 04:18 am UTC (link)
	Tables: like teenage girls with low self-esteem, in a way. Dying here. Dying. :D CSS ALL THE WAY!!! Don't you mean, CSS All The Way!!! (Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

	mcity 2007-11-21 05:18 am UTC (link)
	The tooltip's a nice touch, (Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

	mindset 2007-11-21 07:25 am UTC (link)
	And that's not even CSS. :) But they're fun to include. (Reply to this)(Parent)

mcity
2007-11-21 05:21 am UTC (link)

LMAO Isn't that the argument usually used in favour of divs?

I can't tell; I can't even understand that bit.

(Reply to this)(Parent)

	ruuger 2007-11-21 09:45 am UTC (link)
	a difference between the structure and the graphism Graphism? Is that like oppression towards people with text-only browsers? (Reply to this)(Parent)

(Read comments) -