Log In

Home
    - Create Journal
    - Update
    - Download

LiveJournal
    - News
    - Paid Accounts
    - Contributors

Customize
    - Customize Journal
    - Create Style
    - Edit Style

Find Users
    - Random!
    - By Region
    - By Interest
    - Search

Edit ...
    - Personal Info &
      Settings
    - Your Friends
    - Old Entries
    - Your Pictures
    - Your Password

Developer Area

Need Help?
    - Lost Password?
    - Freq. Asked
      Questions
    - Support Area



Saint Fujur, Martyr ([info]luckdragonfujur) wrote in [info]otf_wank,
@ 2008-01-14 12:17:00


Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
Entry tags:they sell a product that causes cancer

Would you please look at what they sell?!
In vintage_ads, the LJ community where people post --wait for it!-- vintage ads, [info]amadoj0nes posts a Camel advertising in an entry titled "Behold, a blatantly vaginophallic product mascot!" complete with the following sentence(s).

They sell a product that causes cancer.
They sell a product that causes cancer.
They sell a product that causes cancer.
They sell..a product... that causes.. cancer.
They sell a motherf*#@ing product that causes CANCER.



Mostly, folks' replies tend to be from the CRY MOAR variety, to which dear [info]amadoj0nes answers by repeating what seems to be his signature:

They sell a product that causes cancer.

They sell.. A product... That causes...Cancer.

Help me out here. Any generation younger than mine takes about 5-6 repetitions in order for obvious things to sink in.


And people keep saying CRY MOAR.



(Read comments) - (Post a new comment)


[info]ilpalazzo
2008-01-14 09:45 pm UTC (link)
Clearly any two substances which can be smoked are equal in all other ways, including medical benefit, addiction potential, and bodily harm.

Everybody knows that's how it works, pscha. Tobacco = marijuana = festive potpourri.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]seiberwing
2008-01-14 10:16 pm UTC (link)
Obviously we should ban candles. In fact, all fires smoke, let's get rid of them.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]puipui
2008-01-14 10:33 pm UTC (link)
Is it the potpourri with sparklies and stuff in it? Because now I wonder what that kind of thing could do to a body when smoked.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]ilpalazzo
2008-01-14 11:49 pm UTC (link)
CLEARLY THIS IS A JOB FOR SCIENCE!

and by 'science' I mostly mean 'anybody I can pay ten bucks to do this'

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]michmatch
2008-01-15 08:50 am UTC (link)
The chances are very good that Keith Richards would know...

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]pandabonzai
2008-01-16 07:07 pm UTC (link)
That is if he can remember the experience?

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]warrioreowyn
2008-01-15 04:01 am UTC (link)
Well, no, but both tobacco and marajuana are carcinogenic. So yes, there's a kind of basic contradiction there. Besides which, marajuana reeks even worse than cigarette smoke.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]chibikaijuu
2008-01-15 06:36 am UTC (link)
Eh, I'd rather bong water than stale cigarette smell. Plus, cigarette smoke does worse things to my sinuses.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]freezer
2008-01-15 07:30 am UTC (link)
But most people aren't going to mow down a dozen or more marijuana ciagrettes a day.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


dracothelizard
2008-01-16 02:02 pm UTC (link)
And marihuana is often smoked with tobacco anyway, if you're the type to do them hand-rolled.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


(Read comments) -

 
   
Privacy Policy - COPPA
Legal Disclaimer - Site Map