Entry tags:

childfree, cute overload, pet wank, wank overload

Misanthrope Overload?
Ah, Cute Overload. A site that posts pictures of cute animals, what could people possibly wank about there? As the wiki shows, plenty.

I think Meg, the blogger, loves poking the crazies. One of the most reliable sources of "commentroversy" has been her "Cats n Racks" series. Yesterday she posted a video of a cat kneading some boobies with the hopeful tag "Nancy, it's a good thing you brought this to our attention, we've been just starved for commentroversies." Sadly, the commenters behaved themselves and mostly filled the comments with anecdotes about cats kneading soft squishy objects such as nads, ouch.

Meg would not be denied her wank, though! Clearly she had to bring out something NEW, something GUARANTEED to send her readers into apoplexy.

So today she posts... A HUMAN BABY.

*ominous chord*

263 comments so far, including the following gems:
She almost made the worst mistake of her life: Good Gods I was about to send a link to cuteoverload to someone, thank goodness I checked in first. BABIES NEED NOT APPLY.

You don't understand what your blog is about Meg! I DO: human babies are not what cute overload is about!

Whereas animals are completely silent and made of plasticine: Ugh, what's with all this worshiping at the altar of the baby? Babies are not cute, they're noisy and leak fluids. Do not want!

Uhhhh...: When I look at human babies, I just imagine the adult they will grow into... but puppies and kitties, etc., are babies forever!

I also love this comment where someone ponders changing their dissertation.

And finally, some pwnage:
human babies are not cute. if this is to be a regular occurrence, everyone i know who goes to this site will stop, including myself.

[Well, I can already tell how much we'd miss you... - Ed.]

Pass the pa-sickies.

Edit: HT to dragonfangirl. cf_hardcore cheers the brave commenters for speaking truth to power, or something. What's wrong with the word tummy? :(

(Read comments) - (Post a new comment)

	iwanttobeasleep 2008-04-12 05:36 am UTC (link)
	The cat thing was less "Aw, cute!" and more "OH GOD CLAWS". (Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

	risha 2008-04-12 06:39 am UTC (link)
	Oh yes. All of those women were saying that it didn't hurt at all, and I'm going, "OW OW OW OW OW". And the woman who let her cat suckle at her nipples weirded me out. (Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

	iwanttobeasleep 2008-04-12 06:42 am UTC (link)
	I suppose the cat could have it's nails trimmed, and that wouldn't hurt, but. . . That is weird. (Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

risha
2008-04-12 12:34 pm UTC (link)

I wasn't thinking about the nails so much, actually. Max (the furrier of the iconees) often demands excessive amounts of under the blanket morning kneading of various body parts, and he has VERY SHARP CLAWS that I can't keep ahead of.

I don't think that I have particularly sensitive breasts, but having them pummeled like that for that extended period of time would hurt like the dickens.

(Reply to this)(Parent)

	blue_penguin 2008-04-13 12:57 am UTC (link)
	She what? But, but cats have sharp teeth! Why would you encourage them to apply said teeth to sensitive parts of your anatomy?! (Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

	risha 2008-04-13 01:50 am UTC (link)
	To my great relief, upon re-reading she is letting him suckle on a nubbly blanket that she lays over her chest on demand. Someone else said that she does the exact same thing further down. I'm not sure if she knows that she got flamed for it at the bottom of the page. (Reply to this)(Parent)

(Read comments) -