Log In

Home
    - Create Journal
    - Update
    - Download

LiveJournal
    - News
    - Paid Accounts
    - Contributors

Customize
    - Customize Journal
    - Create Style
    - Edit Style

Find Users
    - Random!
    - By Region
    - By Interest
    - Search

Edit ...
    - Personal Info &
      Settings
    - Your Friends
    - Old Entries
    - Your Pictures
    - Your Password

Developer Area

Need Help?
    - Lost Password?
    - Freq. Asked
      Questions
    - Support Area



squeakthemouse ([info]squeakthemouse) wrote in [info]otf_wank,
@ 2008-04-24 14:13:00


Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
Current mood:Spiffy
Entry tags:cats, cute overload, pet wank, wank overload

They should just call it wank overload
So today on Cute Overload, Meg posts an extremely overweight cat.

Cue accusations of animal abuse

Others are convinced hiz fat iz pastede on, yay!

And what wank is complete without caps lock of rage?

Other highlights:

Human abuse!

Won't someone think of the children? 

Your comments will make the owner commit suicide

Wankbait? *gasp* No!

Moar spooge all over the comments, if you can get through it all.



(Read comments) - (Post a new comment)


[info]risha
2008-04-28 02:40 pm UTC (link)
Actually, the latest studies on humans show that the population with the highest mortality rates overall are the underweight (with especially high rates of cancer and surprisingly, diabetes). Next are the very highest BMIs (>35) of the morbidly obese (from heart disease, some weight-related cancers, and diabetes - other death reasons are the same or less then the other BMIs).

I don't have the exact numbers in front of me, though I can find the JAMA abstract if you're interested. But I believe that the next highest mortality is normal weights, then the other versions of obese and morbidly obese. Overweight people die the least often, and have the lowest rates of disease overall.

All of these numbers have been adjusted to make sure that they're not based on the old and ill losing weight as a result of these. These numbers have not been widely reported on by the media, probably because it would show that the scientists really know very little about the so-called "obesity crisis".

Of course, these are numbers are 1. based on humans, which might have fuck all to do with cats, and 2. are based on BMI, which is notoriously inaccurate.

*gets off soapbox*

(Reply to this)(Parent)


(Read comments) -

 
   
Privacy Policy - COPPA
Legal Disclaimer - Site Map