Log In

Home
    - Create Journal
    - Update
    - Download

LiveJournal
    - News
    - Paid Accounts
    - Contributors

Customize
    - Customize Journal
    - Create Style
    - Edit Style

Find Users
    - Random!
    - By Region
    - By Interest
    - Search

Edit ...
    - Personal Info &
      Settings
    - Your Friends
    - Old Entries
    - Your Pictures
    - Your Password

Developer Area

Need Help?
    - Lost Password?
    - Freq. Asked
      Questions
    - Support Area



token ([info]chaimonkey) wrote in [info]otf_wank,
@ 2008-04-27 12:54:00


Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
Current mood:Cliquish

uniforms = fascism
There's wank in the Fark pool again.

The following article gets posted with a "Hero" tag:

Following the school district's implementation of a uniform policy, parents complained that they can't afford uniforms, principal fights back sending an email saying that they should think about their child's education [Article]

Comments start off agreeing with the principal (who is actually a board member), but TheCid is not amused.

TheCid | 2008-04-26 10:08:07 PM
What I want to know is, since when does the government have the power to tell people (regardless of age) what to wear?

How is this not a ridiculous overstepping of their constitutional bounds? How can anyone support this blatant authoritarianism??


the shaman takes a real shining to our boy, and the love affair begins:

TheCid | 2008-04-26 10:25:11 PM
Good to identify yet another person who's part of the problem with this nation. Farking authoritarian followers.

the shaman | 2008-04-26 10:27:48 PM
I've got you farkied as "stupid, paranoid, atheist asshole"

You are the problem.


...And ends:

TheCid | 2008-04-26 10:40:04 PM
You're a lunatic who believes in shamanism and supports tearing down the wall of separation between church and state. You're an deluded fool with no grip on reality.
The fact that you support the authoritarians here in no way surprises me.

Welcome to my ignore list, farktard.


real shaman | 2008-04-26 10:58:46 PM
woooooo!!!! I'm on a dumbass's ignore list.

The rest of the 561 comments (and counting!) result in a dog piling of TheCid, whose ignore list seems to be a desirable goal:

Arthur Jumbles | 2008-04-26 10:58:12 PM
Could you please put me on your ignore list too? Please. I'd put you on mine except I'm not afraid to listen to points of view that differ from my own and as such don't use one.

Some Bass Playing Guy | 2008-04-26 10:59:06 PM
One look at TheCid's picture in his profile tells me all I need to know about him. You know that one person in your circle of friends that nobody likes, but nobody can quite tell that person? That's TheCid. [Profile]

real shaman | 2008-04-26 11:02:03 PM
He looks like the punks whose lunch money ended up in my pocket.

jmmsmile | 2008-04-26 11:17:14 PM
Oooh oooooh! I wanna be on TheCid's ignore list! Pleeeease!!!

You little popcorn fart.


Communism is called:

KoalaFace | 2008-04-26 11:15:58 PM
you seem to be awfully overbearing about your precious crotch dropplings 'freedoms.' Face the facts- this world/country/state/education system is not about YOU. It is about what is the best for the WHOLE. What is best for the whole appears to be school uniforms, for the reasons previously stated.

Don't you think that if EVERYONE in this thread is disagreeing with you quite adimately, that maybe, just maybe, you could be wrong?


TheCid | 2008-04-26 11:18:36 PM
You posting on fark is not the best for the whole. Get back to work, comrade. This country is supposed to be about individual freedom.

Not that many people actually give a shiat about freedom anymore.


real shaman | 2008-04-26 11:24:33 PM
You know who else made lame jokes about communism?

farc | 2008-04-26 11:25:29 PM
godwinned!!!!! ftw

Some real shaman highlights as he enjoys his place on the ignore list:

real shaman | 2008-04-26 11:19:05 PM
neener neener neener neener neener neener
/boy can I be juvenile sometimes.


real shaman | 2008-04-26 11:31:01 PM
I remember now where I argued with thecid before....

He was in total agreement with the requirement of mandatory service for high school students.

It was totally ok then for government officials to tell your kids what to do.


One last funny before it turns into a bullying discussion and repeats from those late to the party:

KoalaFace | 2008-04-26 11:48:25 PM
[TheCid: What happened to your mother was wrong. The school had no business ordering her to change her hairstyle, and the fact that you still support this uniform bullshiat even though you know that story just confirms my suspicions- you are an idiot.

What good is health without freedom?]

you're a grad student, aren't you?


Also, bonus John Stuart Mill discussion starting at 2008-04-26 11:59:50 PM



(Read comments) - (Post a new comment)


[info]bolboreta
2008-04-28 12:15 am UTC (link)
But you have "dress codes", I'm still weirded out by the fact that I was supposed to look at how much fabric was covering my shoulders. Apparently shoulders are much more "distracting" than cleavage, who knew.

In Spain, the only (unwritten) rule is "being fully dressed." Basically, guys have to put a t-shirt on to come to class (taking them off in PE or during the breaks is usually ok), and swimming trunks can't pass as shorts (this was the only thing that caused trouble once in a while). Well, hats aren't allowed either, but because it's rude. I'm not entirely sure we could have gotten away with wearing slippers, but here nobody would wear that in public voluntarily anyway.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]chaimonkey
2008-04-28 03:35 am UTC (link)
Yes and no, it depended on the school. Mine was pretty lax.

Here's their current one:

Students are not permitted to wear the following:
1. head coverings, head bands, or sunglasses
2. see-through garments, exposed midriffs, strapless tops, or spaghetti
straps
3. clothing that is intimidating or a disruption to class
4. clothing that reveals undergarments
5. any potentially dangerous items, such as necklaces, bracelets, rings, or items with sharp or protruding objects, exposed chains of any kind including but not limited to wallet chains
6. hairstyles or colors deemed excessive or distracting
7. articles of clothing which promote the use of any alcoholic beverages, drugs, or tobacco products
8. clothing which contains sexually suggestive language, pictures, inappropriate language, or gang related items


And honestly, they only enforced it if it was dangerous, gang-related, alcohol/drug/sex-related, or you'd pissed them off.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]dragonfangirl
2008-04-28 10:04 am UTC (link)
any potentially dangerous items, such as necklaces, bracelets, rings

LOL.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]agent_hyatt
2008-04-29 05:56 am UTC (link)
The only time jewelry was banned was for concerts, and only if it was bright and flashy enough to distract/blind the conductor. I think I saw more jewelry being worn in high school than anywhere else.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]chaimonkey
2008-04-28 03:37 am UTC (link)
BTW - school in Spain sounds like fun!

And the bit about the guys taking off their shirts reminds me of the cross country vs. soccer kerfuffle. Us CC kids could take off our shirts any time (girls included - sports bras aren't terribly revealing) while the soccer team was absolutely under no circumstances allowed to remove theirs. It pissed them off mightily since we used to run laps around their field!

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]blue_penguin
2008-04-28 05:32 am UTC (link)
Yeah, the "no tank tops" thing always bothered me too. I mean, it's not like I was trying to hypnotize boys with the scandalous sight of my bare shoulders, it's just damn hot in Hong Kong in the summer.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]tofuknight
2008-04-28 07:41 pm UTC (link)
Don't you know? Shoulders are the most erogenous zones EVAR on a woman other than her ankles!!!!

*gags self*

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]blue_penguin
2008-04-28 10:18 pm UTC (link)
Clearly! After all, school officials think so, and they would never mislead us!

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]zing_och
2008-04-28 05:57 pm UTC (link)
We always had one person in the school who went barefoot. Someone stopped (for any reason), someone else started doing it. I have no idea why.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]agent_hyatt
2008-04-29 05:54 am UTC (link)
That's pretty much my old high school's official dress code, too.

"Students are expected to dress in a manner consistent with the academic and social goals of our school. Articles of clothing which are distracting or disruptive to the educational process, which violate common standards of decency and modesty, or which contain obscenities, fighting words, or references to gangs, drugs or alcohol are not acceptable. Extremely brief garments or see-through garments are not appropriate for school. Under garments must not be exposed. Any staff member who feels that a student's attire does not meet these standards may send the student to the Dean for a conference."

Strangely, while I remember more of a dress code for elementary school, I can't find the policy on their website.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]gunshou
2008-04-29 05:58 pm UTC (link)
I'm not entirely sure we could have gotten away with wearing slippers, but here nobody would wear that in public voluntarily anyway.

I have students who come to school in slippers. Or pyjamas. Or both. It irritates the hell out of me; I bother to get dressed, why can't they?

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]bolboreta
2008-04-29 09:02 pm UTC (link)
As a kid, going to school with slippers was one of my most recurrent nightmares... probably because I was absent minded enough to let something like that happen and I knew I wouldn't live pass that. Imagine my shock when I went to an American high school and saw people wearing pink fluffy slippers and pajama pants. I even had a friend that would carry a pillow around all day if she had to stay after school for drama practice, thankfully she wore normal clothes... otherwise I don't know how she would have know she was in class, specially during first period, with people having breakfast and all that.

Yes, I still am slightly traumatized. That said, I don't think the slippers were due to laziness. I'm pretty sure they kept them in their lockers... because I refuse to think they wore them around in the snow.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


(Read comments) -

 
   
Privacy Policy - COPPA
Legal Disclaimer - Site Map