Log In

Home
    - Create Journal
    - Update
    - Download

LiveJournal
    - News
    - Paid Accounts
    - Contributors

Customize
    - Customize Journal
    - Create Style
    - Edit Style

Find Users
    - Random!
    - By Region
    - By Interest
    - Search

Edit ...
    - Personal Info &
      Settings
    - Your Friends
    - Old Entries
    - Your Pictures
    - Your Password

Developer Area

Need Help?
    - Lost Password?
    - Freq. Asked
      Questions
    - Support Area



Nam Jai (nam_jai) wrote in [info]otf_wank,
@ 2008-08-08 18:03:00


Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
Entry tags:dramatic reading, flounce, plagiarism, publishing, special snowflake syndrome

Journalistic flounce!
One of those things where it's really just one person (er, possibly two?) being wanky, but if you love a good plagiarism scandal as much as I do -- most particularly when the accused follows the script so familiar from fandom to the letter -- it's pretty entertaining.

So, Slate writer Jody Rosen is made aware that one of his articles has been plagiarized in a small Texas weekly called the Montgomery County Bulletin, under the byline of one "Mark Williams." Further digging (detailed in that link) turns up many, many Bulletin articles plagiarized from sources ranging from USA Today and The Guardian to (*snerk*) customer reviews on Amazon.

After this draws some attention from Gawker and the Houston Press, plus some sniffing the air catching the scent of a story by NPR and the New York Observer, Bulletin publisher Mike Ladyman is shutting down the paper, taking his toys and going home! That meanie Rosen "truly acts like the rock-and-roll or the music critic" and is guilty of "an attack, an attention-grabbing hatchet job." Even though Ladyman doesn't really deny the plagiarism. It was just inadvertent. Mark Williams meant to be copying press releases, or something.

He does, however, deny the Houston Press's insinuations of sockpuppetry shenanigans. Ladyman insists that Williams is a real person.

Indeed, Williams is real enough to have his feelings hurt, and this is where the plagiarist's script so familiar from fandom gets whipped out:

Kicking it off with: You've got too much time on your hands!

Mr. Rosen: I suppose it is time that we made contact, since I seem to be your favorite new obsession. For such a heralded and busy journalist, it is obvious that you have an abundance of free time in your daily schedule.


...you attention whore:

Of course, you are certainly owed an apology, but one has to ponder for a moment just why that is; after all, you have most definitely garnered the attention of the bloggers that you evidently crave in abundance with this manufactured scandal.


And my life is really hard, you know.

It takes a dogged, intrepid journalist to expose the alleged wrongdoings of a 44-year-old college dropout who drifted from one lousy media job to another for 20 years; it takes courage to debase someone with a mouthful of cut-rate dentures who, up until 2007, lived in his parents’ home for seven years due to near-fatal bouts of clinical depression; it takes a journalist of a certain caliber to torpedo a pathetic hack who has barely squeezed out a living for nearly a decade at seven cents a word.


Anyway, other people do it too, including the Houston Press (I think that's the local daily he means here):

Ironically enough, that same newspaper has, on at least two occasions, shamelessly pilfered from our publication. Bet they didn’t mention that when you called them, huh?


And somewhere amid the raft of plagiarized articles, the Bulletin was doing original, hard-hitting reporting that "called attention to a great number of injustices in our crappy little town, both great and small."

In conclusion, I'm a special snowflake and you have ruined my life:

So there it is, Mr. Rosen -- congratulations on breaking an already fragile soul.


So, this Jody Rosen -- a mean girl (despite being male) in the world of journalism, Y/Y?


(Post a new comment)


[info]llama_treats
2008-08-09 12:21 am UTC (link)
It's nice to know that small town America still believes in Mom, apple pie, and that plagiarism is OK as long as you're a dental-hygiene-challenged, clinically depressed dropout.

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]photosinensis
2008-08-12 12:36 am UTC (link)
This isn't small town America. Montgomery County is suburban.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]llama_treats
2008-08-12 12:54 am UTC (link)
I don't care.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]jat_sapphire
2008-08-09 12:32 am UTC (link)
I'm disappointed. He's missing the part about it being a hommage, or an inside joke, or maybe a social experiment.

I'm also sticking with the sock-puppet theory. Hmm, are there any real reporters on the Montgomery County Bulletin?

(Reply to this)(Thread)


nam_jai
2008-08-09 01:26 am UTC (link)
I'm disappointed. He's missing the part about it being a hommage, or an inside joke, or maybe a social experiment.

True. As an excuse, "I copied press releases, not realizing the publicist was just sharing favorable articles published elsewhere" doesn't seem to have any fandom equivalent, alas.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]alya1989262
2008-08-09 01:40 am UTC (link)
Well, "I didn't know it was plagiarism" kinda counts, I think.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]aristaea
2008-08-09 01:58 am UTC (link)
I think there've been a few wanks where people took fanfic from existing archives to make their own ~*special*~ archives, without permission from the archivists or the authors, and then claimed it couldn't be wrong cos the fic was posted on teh intarwebs, omgz. Kind of similar.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


nam_jai
2008-08-09 01:51 pm UTC (link)
The thing is is that press releases do come with a sort of implicit permission to copy if you want; the publicist just wants to get the word out. It's just very, very, very bad and unethical "journalism."

The ludicrous thing about the excuse is that if a publicist includes quotes from other articles, of course he or she is going to cite them, since the whole point is to show how USA Today or whatever thinks the publicist's client is cool.

But Mark Williams was apparently confused by this over and over and over, which means his own excuse paints him to be a journalistically bankrupt moron now matter how you look at it. (Not that I believe he really did anything but Google articles and copy-and-paste.)

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]notjo
2008-08-09 01:22 am UTC (link)
Oh, he's such a cute little snowflake I want to pinch his wee little cheeks!

(Reply to this)


[info]seraphtrevs
2008-08-09 01:27 am UTC (link)
Sounds like he's dealing with a near fatal bout of clinical butthurt.

(Reply to this)

Translation
[info]rosalita
2008-08-09 01:31 am UTC (link)
I'm a loser. Feel sorry for me.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

Re: Translation
nam_jai
2008-08-09 01:41 am UTC (link)
As a newspaper editor myself, I admire your succinctness. Brought that word count down from 702 to seven!

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

Re: Translation
[info]rosalita
2008-08-09 04:39 pm UTC (link)
I have a degree in mass comm and took many journalism courses. True fax!

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]notjo
2008-08-09 01:46 am UTC (link)
Through our output of articles over the years, we kept a hateful rogue element of the local Republican Party from taking control of our county library system and ripping the Constitution to shreds; we have reported unblinkingly on the troubled plight of illegal aliens living in our area; we have stood face-to-face with members of the Ku Klux Klan to question their ideological inconsistencies; and we touched the heart of a killer who turned himself in after reading an article in our publication on his victim, who, for years, struggled with alcoholism and the estrangement it caused with his family. In short, we have called attention to a great number of injustices in our crappy little town, both great and small.

The power of plagiarism can SAVE THE WORLD!

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]monty
2008-08-09 03:06 am UTC (link)
we kept a hateful rogue element of the local Republican Party from taking control of our county library system and ripping the Constitution to shreds

I -- what? How would that work? Is that how the Republicans work now, by taking over local libraries? I didn't even know local libraries were authorized to rip the Constitution to shreds!

SO MANY QUESTIONS

(also: their objection to the KKK is that they're inconsistent?)

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]silrana
2008-08-09 04:04 am UTC (link)
If it's anything like what gets slung where I live, "ripping the Constitution to shreds" = not allowing people to look at porn on the library's computers in front of 8 year olds.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]vzg
2008-08-09 07:21 pm UTC (link)
It's sort of like pirate ships. The Republicans and Democrats each take public buildings and try to seize the other group's buildings.

For treasure.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]paladin
2008-08-09 09:13 pm UTC (link)
The Pirates of the Crimson Actuary?

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]vzg
2008-08-09 09:34 pm UTC (link)
Yesss!

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]platedlizard
2008-08-11 07:03 am UTC (link)
They sail upon the Accountancy!

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]sparkysrevenge
2008-08-09 05:53 am UTC (link)
Cry hardah, libruhls. Your sweet, precious little alternative newspaper just got screwed over by some of the biggest "alternative" newspapers in the world.

This reminds me again why I won't work in news. Too many wrist-slitting plagiarists. (No offense to those who work in news and aren't, as I'm not referring to you.)

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]paladin
2008-08-09 07:33 am UTC (link)
Through our the journalistic community's output of "borrowed" articles over the years...

I guess his editor quit before he posted that, but I was able to fix it for him.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]dreamer_marie
2008-08-10 08:07 pm UTC (link)
we touched the heart of a killer who turned himself in after reading an article in our publication on his victim, who, for years, struggled with alcoholism and the estrangement it caused with his family.
So, when you get murdered in Texas, you turn into an alcoholic zombie, is that it?

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]tangentialone
2008-08-09 06:27 am UTC (link)
a pathetic hack who has barely squeezed out a living for nearly a decade at seven cents a word.

And not even his own words!

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]issendai
2008-08-09 08:14 am UTC (link)
Is his Google broken? Could he not find even longer articles to plagiarize?

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]lilpocketnin
2008-08-09 06:57 am UTC (link)
:D Yay, professional wank!

it takes a journalist of a certain caliber to torpedo a pathetic hack who has barely squeezed out a living for nearly a decade at seven cents a word.
You are a bad person and you should feel bad!

... so who wants to start calling up radio stations asking about ol' Mark, eh?

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]frequentmouse
2008-08-09 05:30 pm UTC (link)
How many talk radio stations can there possibly be in Brenhem, anyway? Last time we were there, having lost signal from KUT, all we could find was, well, not likely to be employing a liberal morning show talk-jock, let's just leave it at that.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]lilpocketnin
2008-08-09 07:13 pm UTC (link)
Nine stations total; only one had a website, and he wasn't listed as staff there.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]issendai
2008-08-09 08:15 am UTC (link)
*sighs happily* Finally, a plagiarism wank where no one can invoke Ebert's Law.

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]out_bottle
2008-08-09 07:26 pm UTC (link)
I'm afraid to ask...

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]issendai
2008-08-09 07:38 pm UTC (link)
Ebert's Law: "Oh, yeah? Let's see you do it!" Or, spelled out: "You cannot legitimately criticize something or somebody unless you have their skill set." A favorite of Twilight fans.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]shaysdays
2008-08-11 02:02 pm UTC (link)
Wait- from what I've seen of Twilight books... my ten year old could criticize it, then.

(Seriously, all I've seen is excerpts, maybe it's a lot less like a girly version of a Gor book in context.)

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]vzg
2008-08-09 07:23 pm UTC (link)
He lived at home, dropped out of college, and didn't write the articles he was paid for.

What was he doing with all that free time?

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]jupiterpluvius
2008-08-10 09:20 pm UTC (link)
Onanism is a very time-consuming hobby.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]issendai
2008-08-09 07:52 pm UTC (link)
Seven cents a word? He's trying to drum up sympathy because poor little him gets--well, got--only seven cents a word? Seven cents for hackwork is sweet. In the writing-for-hire I do, one cent is standard, two is good, and five is kingly--and this is in an industry where clients routinely copyscape freelancers' work to check for plagiarism before they pay. What in hell is Mark complaining about?

(Reply to this)(Thread)


nam_jai
2008-08-09 08:49 pm UTC (link)
Seven cents a word struck me as on the low side for newspaper writing -- I know the paper where I work pays freelancers more. But that does presume the freelancer is actually writing those words, in which case, yes, what the hell is he complaining about? Money for nothing is overpaying, dude.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]pfeffermuse
2008-08-10 10:30 pm UTC (link)
Why do I have that song from the musical The Pajama Game going through my head:

Seven-and-a-half cents doesn't mean a heck of a lot.
Seven-and-a-half cents doesn't mean a thing.
But give it to me every hour,
Forty hours every week,
And that's enough to have me livin' like a king . . .

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]puipui
2008-08-09 11:01 pm UTC (link)
I am far too amused that you used a Sarah Jane icon to post this. ♥

(Reply to this)(Thread)


nam_jai
2008-08-10 05:09 am UTC (link)
As a journalist of integrity herself, oh how Sarah Jane could lay the smackdown on these fools! (Except, darn her for being fictional.)

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]napalmnacey
2008-08-11 08:33 am UTC (link)
I know, right? The world is sadder for not having a real Sarah Jane in it.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]felinephoenix
2008-08-13 01:41 am UTC (link)
Journalism wank?!

This is the best thing ever.

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]felinephoenix
2008-08-13 02:08 am UTC (link)
Also, I agree with the commentors who want Williams to write humor. Even if it is unintentional humor.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


 
   
Privacy Policy - COPPA
Legal Disclaimer - Site Map