Log In

Home
    - Create Journal
    - Update
    - Download

LiveJournal
    - News
    - Paid Accounts
    - Contributors

Customize
    - Customize Journal
    - Create Style
    - Edit Style

Find Users
    - Random!
    - By Region
    - By Interest
    - Search

Edit ...
    - Personal Info &
      Settings
    - Your Friends
    - Old Entries
    - Your Pictures
    - Your Password

Developer Area

Need Help?
    - Lost Password?
    - Freq. Asked
      Questions
    - Support Area



Nam Jai (nam_jai) wrote in [info]otf_wank,
@ 2008-08-08 18:03:00


Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
Entry tags:dramatic reading, flounce, plagiarism, publishing, special snowflake syndrome

Journalistic flounce!
One of those things where it's really just one person (er, possibly two?) being wanky, but if you love a good plagiarism scandal as much as I do -- most particularly when the accused follows the script so familiar from fandom to the letter -- it's pretty entertaining.

So, Slate writer Jody Rosen is made aware that one of his articles has been plagiarized in a small Texas weekly called the Montgomery County Bulletin, under the byline of one "Mark Williams." Further digging (detailed in that link) turns up many, many Bulletin articles plagiarized from sources ranging from USA Today and The Guardian to (*snerk*) customer reviews on Amazon.

After this draws some attention from Gawker and the Houston Press, plus some sniffing the air catching the scent of a story by NPR and the New York Observer, Bulletin publisher Mike Ladyman is shutting down the paper, taking his toys and going home! That meanie Rosen "truly acts like the rock-and-roll or the music critic" and is guilty of "an attack, an attention-grabbing hatchet job." Even though Ladyman doesn't really deny the plagiarism. It was just inadvertent. Mark Williams meant to be copying press releases, or something.

He does, however, deny the Houston Press's insinuations of sockpuppetry shenanigans. Ladyman insists that Williams is a real person.

Indeed, Williams is real enough to have his feelings hurt, and this is where the plagiarist's script so familiar from fandom gets whipped out:

Kicking it off with: You've got too much time on your hands!

Mr. Rosen: I suppose it is time that we made contact, since I seem to be your favorite new obsession. For such a heralded and busy journalist, it is obvious that you have an abundance of free time in your daily schedule.


...you attention whore:

Of course, you are certainly owed an apology, but one has to ponder for a moment just why that is; after all, you have most definitely garnered the attention of the bloggers that you evidently crave in abundance with this manufactured scandal.


And my life is really hard, you know.

It takes a dogged, intrepid journalist to expose the alleged wrongdoings of a 44-year-old college dropout who drifted from one lousy media job to another for 20 years; it takes courage to debase someone with a mouthful of cut-rate dentures who, up until 2007, lived in his parents’ home for seven years due to near-fatal bouts of clinical depression; it takes a journalist of a certain caliber to torpedo a pathetic hack who has barely squeezed out a living for nearly a decade at seven cents a word.


Anyway, other people do it too, including the Houston Press (I think that's the local daily he means here):

Ironically enough, that same newspaper has, on at least two occasions, shamelessly pilfered from our publication. Bet they didn’t mention that when you called them, huh?


And somewhere amid the raft of plagiarized articles, the Bulletin was doing original, hard-hitting reporting that "called attention to a great number of injustices in our crappy little town, both great and small."

In conclusion, I'm a special snowflake and you have ruined my life:

So there it is, Mr. Rosen -- congratulations on breaking an already fragile soul.


So, this Jody Rosen -- a mean girl (despite being male) in the world of journalism, Y/Y?


(Read comments) - (Post a new comment)


[info]issendai
2008-08-09 08:15 am UTC (link)
*sighs happily* Finally, a plagiarism wank where no one can invoke Ebert's Law.

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]out_bottle
2008-08-09 07:26 pm UTC (link)
I'm afraid to ask...

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]issendai
2008-08-09 07:38 pm UTC (link)
Ebert's Law: "Oh, yeah? Let's see you do it!" Or, spelled out: "You cannot legitimately criticize something or somebody unless you have their skill set." A favorite of Twilight fans.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]shaysdays
2008-08-11 02:02 pm UTC (link)
Wait- from what I've seen of Twilight books... my ten year old could criticize it, then.

(Seriously, all I've seen is excerpts, maybe it's a lot less like a girly version of a Gor book in context.)

(Reply to this)(Parent)


(Read comments) -

 
   
Privacy Policy - COPPA
Legal Disclaimer - Site Map