Log In

Home
    - Create Journal
    - Update
    - Download

LiveJournal
    - News
    - Paid Accounts
    - Contributors

Customize
    - Customize Journal
    - Create Style
    - Edit Style

Find Users
    - Random!
    - By Region
    - By Interest
    - Search

Edit ...
    - Personal Info &
      Settings
    - Your Friends
    - Old Entries
    - Your Pictures
    - Your Password

Developer Area

Need Help?
    - Lost Password?
    - Freq. Asked
      Questions
    - Support Area



Pyrate Jenni ([info]pyratejenni) wrote in [info]otf_wank,
@ 2008-08-21 14:08:00


Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
Entry tags:authorwank, baleeted, books, defensiveness ahoy, internet lawyers, magic 8 ball sez: wank again later, miss cleo told me i'm special, passive-aggressive smileys, publishing, reviews

Bad Review Tempertantrums -- Not Just for Amateurs Anymore
Over on Dear Author, Jane posts about an author overreacting to bad Amazon.com reviews

The author's fans are quick to point out that Jane is just jealous, a meanie, has no life, etc. And the author herself responds. The comments have been deleted, but [info]breecita saved them



————————————————————————-
Post 1 - Victoria Laurie

Wow! Do you need a hug, honey….you sound like the dog that got kicked and wants to bite someone just to feel better. Poor thing. Ah well, perhaps in your next lifetime you’ll come back as someone with a better outlook! :)

Oh, and in referring to your review above, not all of the clues come from the ghosties - obviously in that hour you skimmed a lot! Most of them, in fact, come from the living, (Detective Muckleroy, Nickie, Dory, Maude’s sister and the list goes on and on…really, how did you miss them? Or maybe you were just having fun whth the thrashing you were giving me?) And who specifically in my novel said, “There’s so much chemistry between you two!” Seriously, if you’re going to quote my text, it would be nice if you actually QUOTED my text! :)

Anyway, best of luck to you, doll, I’m sending you a mental hug cuz I’m pretty sure you need one. :)
————————————————————————-
Post 2 - Donna D

Also, “J”, if you disliked it so much, how on earth did you manage to read the entire book in an hour? It sounds as though it must have been quite engrossing! I, for one, thoroughly enjoyed Demons:)

Donna
————————————————————————-
Post 3 - R Golden

J. Kaplan, your review says more about you than this book. I couldn’t disagree with you more. I was sad when I reached the last page. I want to hang out more with MJ and the gang!

-Rose
————————————————————————-
Post 4 - Jenni B

I am curious as to why both reviews you have posted are negative. It would be very helpful if you had a few reviews of books you enjoyed so a person could get an idea of where you are coming from. Right now, it just sounds like you are being unnecessarily spiteful and mean. Or that you have really bad taste in books, picking “bad” ones over and over again. Again, I am interested in seeing what you qualify as a good book. Oh, and the reviews that are obviously bitter are not helpful. Negative reviews can be helpful, just when they are done in a more constructive, knowledgeable and balanced way. Thanks!
————————————————————————-
Post 5 - J Rose

I was going to try this book, but I’m always put off when I noticed the author retaliate against someone that gave her a bad review. That has turned me off from a few authors. That is really tacky. Ignoring it would have been much classier. Then I noticed that this author commented on this reviewer’s other review. This author is creepy, and not in a cool author of horror kind of way. I’m writing down the author’s name so when I hear it again I will remember to warn others.
————————————————————————-
Post 6 - Victoria Laurie

Ha ha ha ha ha!!!! Oh, J Rose! This made me laugh! I love that you’re going to write down my name and “warn others”! Ha ha ha ha! That is too precious for words! (I am just imagining you in a bookstore with a list of authors to warn people about…hilarious) I looooove it! Thanks for the giggle, girl! hee hee! :)
————————————————————————-
Post 7 - J Rose

Bitter authors are a laugh to me, so cheers!
————————————————————————-
Post 8 - Victoria Laurie

Rosey-dosey….are you cuckoo for cocoa puffs or what? :)

Oh, and dear, it’s spelled “whatsoever” not “what so ever”. Might want to grab a dictionary the next time you decide to write a one-star review - that’s right everyone - Rose likes to award the onre star to books she’s not read all the way through too! So, me thinks that her (over) reaction above was because she was feeling a tad bit self-conscious. Maybe you and J Kaplan should form a Negative Nellie’s club! Ooo! You can trade your list of authors back and forth and “warn” people the world over! “Alert! Alert! This author responds to mistruths and misquotes! Gasp! It’s the begining of the end for us allllll!” Ha, ha, ha! Yep…that still cracks me up! It’s comic gold! :)



Whiny pros! Whinier fans! Passive-aggressive smilies!

All we need is a flounce, a sobbing vow to Never Write Again, and/or a pseudocide.

ETA: Thanks to [info]carlanime, a prequel of sorts.

ETA2: Crap, wrong link, wrong potential post. If anyone wants to write up about possibly fraudelent conniving, lying, soul-bonding-is-my-religion! roommates from hell, drop a line.



(Read comments) - (Post a new comment)


[info]fevered_ego
2008-08-21 08:15 pm UTC (link)
Puts me in mind of Stephen King writing the guy who hit him with a van into the Dark Tower series, making him borderline retarded and incredibly stoned, and not even changing his name. All of this done years after the man in question passed away, of course.

Also, does anyone recall the name of the big-leagues author who made the news a few years back because he stuck a real person in his book and made them a sex pervert for revenge? It's driving me crazy.

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]phosfate
2008-08-21 08:19 pm UTC (link)
Michael Chrichton, I believe.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]phosfate
2008-08-21 08:19 pm UTC (link)
Except, y'know, spelled correctly. *facepalm*

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]fevered_ego
2008-08-21 08:29 pm UTC (link)
Yes! Thank you!

For anyone who hasn't read about it, it's good stuff.

*SPOILER* He made his enemy a child-raper.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]brown_betty
2008-08-22 01:34 am UTC (link)
With a teeny penis!

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]phosfate
2008-08-22 03:13 am UTC (link)
That's because a child-raper with a massive penis would be too unpleasant for the general book-reading public.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]feenix
2008-08-22 03:31 am UTC (link)
I love how he added THAT little detail in. "Oh yeah, and his dick is small." You know, just because being a child raper isn't bad enough - you have to have a tiny peen on top of that.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]wickedlester
2008-08-23 04:15 pm UTC (link)
The comments left are great.

… And to extrapolate the analogy “Michael Crowley wrote a scathing criticism of Crichton, Mick Crowley is a child rapist in Crichton’s next book.” I guess that Crichton himself is a toddler with tears in his rectum.

I wish I had a bright shiny internet to wrap up and give that person.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]breecita
2008-08-21 08:56 pm UTC (link)
He drowned my polar bear. :(

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]puipui
2008-08-21 09:07 pm UTC (link)
That bastard! :(

(Reply to this)(Parent)

Sometimes Memes Speak For Me
[info]fevered_ego
2008-08-22 06:07 am UTC (link)
But how does a polar bear know what faulty scientific data which has been debunked thoroughly in a mountain of peer-reviewed journals apples is!?

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

Re: Sometimes Memes Speak For Me
[info]darksumomo
2008-08-22 11:53 am UTC (link)
Love your Time Cube icon.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]brennalarose
2008-08-22 02:11 pm UTC (link)
*mourns with you, hugs white teddy bear*

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]delineated
2008-08-22 05:54 am UTC (link)
making him borderline retarded and incredibly stoned

So slightly more tolerable than most Stephen King characters, then.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]fevered_ego
2008-08-22 06:10 am UTC (link)
Haha, zing.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]m_butterfly
2008-08-22 12:18 pm UTC (link)
I wouldn't call villainizing the guy who nearly killed you quite the same as writing someone who left you bad feedback as a whore with VD.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]funwithrage
2008-08-22 05:09 pm UTC (link)
Yeah. Not the most serene and Buddha-like response, but...dude ran him over with a *van*. I can see taking some in-book vengeance.

That said, the "overlap with King's real life" section was when the DT books began to go downhill, so it wasn't exactly a brilliant piece of writing, either.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]kittenmommy
2008-08-29 11:36 am UTC (link)

That said, the "overlap with King's real life" section was when the DT books began to go downhill, so it wasn't exactly a brilliant piece of writing, either.

So much word. It all started going downhill with Wolves of the Calla and just never stopped until the very end. :(

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]fevered_ego
2008-08-22 07:48 pm UTC (link)
I said it put me in mind of the King story, not that they were the same. Specifically, a writer getting petty revenge against a real (and in this case, recently deceased) person by putting them in your story as a caricature and making them do stupid things.

I'm glad to see King's trying to work through his issues with the accident and all, but yeesh.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]wickedlester
2008-08-23 04:11 pm UTC (link)
Me either. I thought the whole self insertion was lame, but with the guy who ran over him? What I read sounded an awful lot like what I had read already in the papers, when King was still in the hospital and hadn't had a chance to talk about the accident yet. I remember clearly that the guy admitted he wasn't watching the road, but was paying more attention to his dogs.

That part came across more like someone handed him all the news articles and said, "Write this up as a story, instead of an article."



(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]bakashinobi
2008-09-05 05:30 pm UTC (link)
Stephen King was doing this even before the accident.

Case in point: In The Talisman, two nasty villains are named Smokey Updike and Sunlight Gardener, after John Updike and John Gardner, two fellow writers who committed the heinous crime of receiving the praise from critics that Mr. King craved for himself.

I'm a big fan of his work, but personally...dude's got issues. A whole stack of 'em. In his basement.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


(Read comments) -

 
   
Privacy Policy - COPPA
Legal Disclaimer - Site Map