Log In

Home
    - Create Journal
    - Update
    - Download

LiveJournal
    - News
    - Paid Accounts
    - Contributors

Customize
    - Customize Journal
    - Create Style
    - Edit Style

Find Users
    - Random!
    - By Region
    - By Interest
    - Search

Edit ...
    - Personal Info &
      Settings
    - Your Friends
    - Old Entries
    - Your Pictures
    - Your Password

Developer Area

Need Help?
    - Lost Password?
    - Freq. Asked
      Questions
    - Support Area



joye ([info]joye) wrote in [info]otf_wank,
@ 2008-09-24 22:46:00


Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
Entry tags:animals, cute overload, jokes that don't go over well, unfunny write-up, wank overload

baby animal abusers: second verse, same as the first
Ah, infant formula wank. No, not the infant formula scandal. I mean the equation for surefire wank on Cute Overload:
human child in picture = OMG NOT CUTE EVIL STUPID BAYBEE
It's a pretty simple formula, but the results here are deliciously tainted with melamine.

It's another Asian infant chomping on a puppy. Racewank is happily avoided for the most part, though, so you can relax.

I can't go through all 256 comments right now, but here's a few skimmed off the top:

This one is probably a joke: Who will end up with the personality complex? The baby who didn't know any better and must eat puppy faces or the puppy who will forever need to be inside someone's mouth!

Well, thanks for justifying this with your ovaries: While I am female, I do NOT think babies are cute - unless they have fur and tails. The furless ones just grow up to hate you anyway.

According to my breastfeeding friends, it's a lot more than that: Babies sorta suck sometimes.

This is your chance for internet glory: Last I looked, CuteButNotBabiesOverload.com did not exist.

It's our responsibility as intarweb police!: Enough with the pudding comments. When the picture is obviously this disturbing, people have a right and a duty to comment on just how awful it is.

And here's the thread on the LJ feed. First comment is "in before wank". But we do have this lovely poem:
it is not cute
and it is not ok
the puppy is probably hurting
picture the cutest monkey holding your baby by the head
and then someone even bigger thaking a picture of it
the monkey doesn't know the baby is hurting
but it doesn't make it ok


And, for the sake of sanity:
But, for the hell of all you people who think that baby is messed up in the head, lets beat the hell out of the baby for doing what she knows to do, which is...

Item
Item=Mouth


Edit: CO now has more than one poster and the poster of the above was actually "Not That Mike the Other Mike." Not to be outdone, Meg has upped the stakes by posting an image of adult human women. And filed them under "primates." Ahahahahahahaha. I <3 you Meg. (Wank, natch.)

More taxonomy wank, plz. Thanks to [info]exit_chrysalis for linking us. (There's also people talking about BSG, Torchwood and Firefly in the comments; the wank streams have crossed!)



(Read comments) - (Post a new comment)

moar Melamine tl;dr + extra science
[info]keleri
2008-09-26 12:31 am UTC (link)
The main way to test for protein in the food industry is to use the Kjeldahl method, which uses acid to decompose the protein into carbon dioxide and ammonium salts. Proteins are made of amino acids which contain nitrogen, and measuring the amount of ammonium will give you an idea of how much nitrogen and thus protein is in the food. The other test, the Dumas test, also measures nitrogen in the same way.

Melamine has 6 extra nitrogen atoms in it, so adding a little will boost the nitrogen level of the food and fudge the test.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

Re: moar Melamine tl;dr + extra science
[info]issendai
2008-09-26 02:22 am UTC (link)
Woo! I am enlightened. Your giant brains are sexy.

Is there a way to test for protein that doesn't lend itself to dumping industrial chemicals into the food?

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

Re: moar Melamine tl;dr + extra science
[info]keleri
2008-09-26 03:46 am UTC (link)
Yesssss my science degree gains me recognition and prestige! /sedate dance

There's a bunch of tests we can do in the lab to measure protein but they're similarly indirect; I don't think there's a [cheap] way to measure absolute protein concentration at all. [opaque technical references] If they did UV spectroscopy, melamine would probably still work because it has lots of double bonds and I would guess absorbs UV light. If they did Bradford or Lowry assay, they'd probably add another chemical that complexes copper ions. [/opaque technical references] And those other methods are not as cheap as the Kjeldahl/Dumas methods and harder to do on an industrial scale. >____

(Reply to this)(Parent)


(Read comments) -

 
   
Privacy Policy - COPPA
Legal Disclaimer - Site Map