Log In

Home
    - Create Journal
    - Update
    - Download

LiveJournal
    - News
    - Paid Accounts
    - Contributors

Customize
    - Customize Journal
    - Create Style
    - Edit Style

Find Users
    - Random!
    - By Region
    - By Interest
    - Search

Edit ...
    - Personal Info &
      Settings
    - Your Friends
    - Old Entries
    - Your Pictures
    - Your Password

Developer Area

Need Help?
    - Lost Password?
    - Freq. Asked
      Questions
    - Support Area



Full o' Doom ([info]doomsday) wrote in [info]otf_wank,
@ 2008-10-01 13:05:00


Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
Entry tags:authorwank, books, fun with fundies, inappropriate references to acts of god, it's not for you, pretention, religion, reviews

Intelligently designed wank
Who's in the mood for a good ol' academic tussle?

1. Professor Steve Fuller writes a book called Dissent over Descent: Intelligent Design's Challenge to Darwinism.

2. Professor AC Grayling reviews the book for New Humanist magazine.

It is sometimes hard to know whether books that strike one as silly and irresponsible...are the product of a desire to strike a pose and appear outrageous (the John Gray syndrome), or really do represent that cancer of the contemporary intellect, post-modernism.

3. Fuller responds to the review.
I wish I could repay AC Grayling’s compliment by naming an exotic mental pathology after him, but regrettably his review of Dissent over Descent displays disorders of a much more mundane kind: he has merely failed to read the book properly and does not know what he is talking about.

4. Grayling responds to the response.
Steve Fuller complains, as do all authors whose books are panned, that I did not read his book properly (or at all). Alas, I did.

5. Forum fight!


(Read comments) - (Post a new comment)


[info]sevendeadlyfun
2008-10-01 10:59 pm UTC (link)
Not only is there the full, luscious beauty of interrogating the text from the wrong perspective but there's Buddhist scorn. I love academia wank.

Love. It.

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]plazmah
2008-10-02 03:28 am UTC (link)
"Buddhist scorn" is not a phrase I ever expected to see on otf_wank. How silly of me.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]doomsday
2008-10-02 05:26 am UTC (link)
We've had everything from knitting wank to cake wank. Full-on Buddhist wank is just a matter of time.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]rosehiptea
2008-10-02 05:40 am UTC (link)
Actually, I do remember some Buddhist wank from an LJ Buddhist community.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


tree
2008-10-02 06:36 am UTC (link)
Is wank even... possible in Buddhism?

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]aerobot
2008-10-02 06:39 am UTC (link)
Yeah, you'd think they'd be too zen to wank at each other. And over what?

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]erototoxin
2008-10-02 07:01 am UTC (link)
The sound of one hand wanking?

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]aristaea
2008-10-02 10:25 am UTC (link)
Pretty sure it's still "fap"...

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]ru_debega
2008-10-03 07:35 pm UTC (link)
I think it's just "fa." You'd need the other hand to supply the "p."

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]rosehiptea
2008-10-02 07:52 am UTC (link)
I think it was some kind of a "you're not a real Buddhist" bit but maybe I'm projecting.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]viralmemory
2008-10-02 11:39 am UTC (link)
Sounds like the OwlClan debates. He's not a Buddhist by his own admission, but it was one of his favorite places to throw out a net of condescension and superiority, baited with his personal Norse mythology religion.

Kinda lulzy, but I had to take the comm off my flist. too much whining.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]bienegold
2008-10-02 09:11 pm UTC (link)
UGH. I remember him, but from the Norse side of things. Hate.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]shaysdays
2008-10-02 08:24 am UTC (link)
I have seen a Buddhist or two wank like crazy on religious matters. Mostly it was the of the, "I'm wiser than you, unenlightened mofos" variety, only with less cussing and more passive aggressive 'advice.'

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


tree
2008-10-02 11:43 am UTC (link)
I'd have thought that in Buddhism, unless it's the teacher pulling an intellectual prank on a novice, such attitude makes for an automatic fail.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]ayezur
2008-10-02 02:44 pm UTC (link)
Well, yes. But the great thing is, they have as many lives as they need to get it right.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]darksumomo
2008-10-02 05:09 pm UTC (link)
My favorite comment is the one that is current at the bottom of the page there.

"ID is long on theorists. They must kill their experimentalists."

I LOLed.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


(Read comments) -

 
   
Privacy Policy - COPPA
Legal Disclaimer - Site Map