Log In

Home
    - Create Journal
    - Update
    - Download

LiveJournal
    - News
    - Paid Accounts
    - Contributors

Customize
    - Customize Journal
    - Create Style
    - Edit Style

Find Users
    - Random!
    - By Region
    - By Interest
    - Search

Edit ...
    - Personal Info &
      Settings
    - Your Friends
    - Old Entries
    - Your Pictures
    - Your Password

Developer Area

Need Help?
    - Lost Password?
    - Freq. Asked
      Questions
    - Support Area



Captain Mary Flint ([info]doneril) wrote in [info]otf_wank,
@ 2009-02-27 00:54:00


Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
Entry tags:oh taggy boy the pipes are calling, requiescat in tage, where have all the tags gone?

Feministing Porn Wank
Over on feministing.com, Steven asks So I am wondering what the view of porn are here. How it affects men, women, society. Good affects, bad affects, all that stuff. among other things and spawns wank.

Lilith Luffles scores with the first mention of Andrea Dworkin's view of porn. In the replies to that, RuPaula and meeneecat debate women's cum shots.

Sarah whines that people who like porn don't watch her porn and has low reading comprehension.

In the same thread, porn stars (and all sex workers) are slaves of the patriarchry. Actually, all women are slaves of the patriarchy and nothing more than their bodies.

Rachel in WY complains that porn is made for men.

MASHBengal thinks written and animated porn are worse than live action porn and more demeaning. timothy_nakayama asked for her thoughts on yaoi, but she doesn't respond.

kaitlynva demands that someone think of the children.

Your fantasy is wrong. You're just a tool of the patriarchy.



(Read comments) - (Post a new comment)


[info]mydemand
2009-02-28 10:50 pm UTC (link)
ooh, could you share a summary?

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]heddychaa
2009-02-28 11:05 pm UTC (link)
It was a written assignment so. . .:

Positive: IIIIIIIII
Negative: IIIII
Lazy responses that didn't answer the question: I
On the fence: IIIII

Choice comments:

"If there were no other women fighting for their rights, they wouldn't have gotten them if there were just flappers"

"They showed that they weren't afraid of men's opinions. . . This showed that they were tired of being stuck at home and being treated like objects"

"The women of Canada were fighting for recognition and respect, but the behavior of the flappers would certainly not get them the respect they wanted"

"The easiest form of self-expression is physical appearance and I think the flappers did a wonderful job of expressing how they were equal to men"

"In the sense that the flappers represented independant women. At the time and even in some cases today women were 'used' by men as tools. The flappers used their sexualism to control men."

"damaging to the cause of women because it showed just how immature they can be well, as well as showing their lack of respect for peers and elders"

"They made it hard for figures like Agnes Macphail and Emily Murphy who fought for good causes to be taken seriously"

"the more important cause was for new job opportunieies in politics in other fields. . . I think it would be even more difficult to oercome a view of women as flappers than as housewives"




And then there was the girl who used this argument as a chance to go on a rant about lesbians and abortion damaging women's wombs. Er.

It was a good exercise, though, because if I used the "f" word, they all would have gotten a stick up their butts. This way they're engaging in the dialogue without the stigma.


(Reply to this)(Parent)


(Read comments) -

 
   
Privacy Policy - COPPA
Legal Disclaimer - Site Map